963 research outputs found

    Susceptibility to Social Engineering in Social Networking Sites: The Case of Facebook

    Get PDF
    Past research has suggested that social engineering poses the most significant security risk. Recent studies have suggested that social networking sites (SNSs) are the most common source of social engineering attacks. The risk of social engineering attacks in SNSs is associated with the difficulty of making accurate judgments regarding source credibility in the virtual environment of SNSs. In this paper, we quantitatively investigate source credibility dimensions in terms of social engineering on Facebook, as well as the source characteristics that influence Facebook users to judge an attacker as credible, therefore making them susceptible to victimization. Moreover, in order to predict usersโ€™ susceptibility to social engineering victimization based on their demographics, we investigate the effectiveness of source characteristics on different demographic groups by measuring the consent intentions and behavior responses of users to social engineering requests using a role-play experiment

    A Survey of Social Network Forensics

    Get PDF
    Social networks in any form, specifically online social networks (OSNs), are becoming a part of our everyday life in this new millennium especially with the advanced and simple communication technologies through easily accessible devices such as smartphones and tablets. The data generated through the use of these technologies need to be analyzed for forensic purposes when criminal and terrorist activities are involved. In order to deal with the forensic implications of social networks, current research on both digital forensics and social networks need to be incorporated and understood. This will help digital forensics investigators to predict, detect and even prevent any criminal activities in different forms. It will also help researchers to develop new models / techniques in the future. This paper provides literature review of the social network forensics methods, models, and techniques in order to provide an overview to the researchers for their future works as well as the law enforcement investigators for their investigations when crimes are committed in the cyber space. It also provides awareness and defense methods for OSN users in order to protect them against to social attacks

    Potential mass surveillance and privacy violations in proximity-based social applications

    Get PDF
    Proximity-based social applications let users interact with people that are currently close to them, by revealing some information about their preferences and whereabouts. This information is acquired through passive geo-localisation and used to build a sense of serendipitous discovery of people, places and interests. Unfortunately, while this class of applications opens different interactions possibilities for people in urban settings, obtaining access to certain identity information could lead a possible privacy attacker to identify and follow a user in their movements in a specific period of time. The same information shared through the platform could also help an attacker to link the victim's online profiles to physical identities. We analyse a set of popular dating application that shares users relative distances within a certain radius and show how, by using the information shared on these platforms, it is possible to formalise a multilateration attack, able to identify the user actual position. The same attack can also be used to follow a user in all their movements within a certain period of time, therefore identifying their habits and Points of Interest across the city. Furthermore we introduce a social attack which uses common Facebook likes to profile a person and finally identify their real identity

    Command & Control: Understanding, Denying and Detecting - A review of malware C2 techniques, detection and defences

    Full text link
    In this survey, we first briefly review the current state of cyber attacks, highlighting significant recent changes in how and why such attacks are performed. We then investigate the mechanics of malware command and control (C2) establishment: we provide a comprehensive review of the techniques used by attackers to set up such a channel and to hide its presence from the attacked parties and the security tools they use. We then switch to the defensive side of the problem, and review approaches that have been proposed for the detection and disruption of C2 channels. We also map such techniques to widely-adopted security controls, emphasizing gaps or limitations (and success stories) in current best practices.Comment: Work commissioned by CPNI, available at c2report.org. 38 pages. Listing abstract compressed from version appearing in repor

    ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ž ํƒ์ง€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊น€์ข…๊ถŒ.In the last decade we have witnessed the explosive growth of online social networking services (SNSs) such as Facebook, Twitter, Weibo and LinkedIn. While SNSs provide diverse benefits โ€“ for example, fostering inter-personal relationships, community formations and news propagation, they also attracted uninvited nuiance. Spammers abuse SNSs as vehicles to spread spams rapidly and widely. Spams, unsolicited or inappropriate messages, significantly impair the credibility and reliability of services. Therefore, detecting spammers has become an urgent and critical issue in SNSs. This paper deals with spamming in Twitter and Weibo. Instead of spreading annoying messages to the public, a spammer follows (subscribes to) normal users, and followed a normal user. Sometimes a spammer makes link farm to increase target accounts explicit influence. Based on the assumption that the online relationships of spammers are different from those of normal users, I proposed classification schemes that detect online social attackers including spammers. I firstly focused on ego-network social relations and devised two features, structural features based on Triad Significance Profile (TSP) and relational semantic features based on hierarchical homophily in an ego-network. Experiments on real Twitter and Weibo datasets demonstrated that the proposed approach is very practical. The proposed features are scalable because instead of analyzing the whole network, they inspect user-centered ego-networks. My performance study showed that proposed methods yield significantly better performance than prior scheme in terms of true positives and false positives.์ตœ๊ทผ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” Facebook, Twitter, Weibo, LinkedIn ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ํญ๋ฐœ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋ชฉ๊ฒฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‰ด์Šค ์ „ํŒŒ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ด ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๊ฐ‘์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํ˜„์ƒ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋“ค์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๋™๋ ฅ ์‚ผ์•„ ์ŠคํŒธ์„ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋„“๊ฒŒ ์ „ํŒŒํ•˜๋Š” ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์•…์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒธ์€ ์ˆ˜์‹ ์ž๊ฐ€ ์›์น˜ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๋“ค์„ ์ผ์ปฝ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด๋Š” ์„œ๋น„์Šค์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์™€ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์†์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ˜„์žฌ ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ธด๊ธ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋“ค ์ค‘ Twitter์™€ Weibo์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ŠคํŒจ๋ฐ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ŠคํŒจ๋ฐ๋“ค์€ ๋ถˆํŠน์ • ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ „ํŒŒํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ ์—, ๋งŽ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์„ 'ํŒ”๋กœ์šฐ(๊ตฌ๋…)'ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ '๋งž ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰(๋งž ๊ตฌ๋…)'์„ ์ด๋Œ์–ด ๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋•Œ๋กœ๋Š” link farm์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํŠน์ • ๊ณ„์ •์˜ ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ณ  ๋ช…์‹œ์  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ์˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ • ํ•˜์—, ๋‚˜๋Š” ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ž๋“ค์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋Š” ๋จผ์ € ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๋‚ด ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง์˜ Triad Significance Profile (TSP)์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ Hierarchical homophily์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜๋ฏธ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ Twitter์™€ Weibo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์€ ์ „์ฒด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง๋งŒ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— scalableํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด true positive์™€ false positive ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Related Work 6 2.1 OSN Spammer Detection Approaches 6 2.1.1 Contents-based Approach 6 2.1.2 Social Network-based Approach 7 2.1.3 Subnetwork-based Approach 8 2.1.4 Behavior-based Approach 9 2.2 Link Spam Detection 10 2.3 Data mining schemes for Spammer Detection 10 2.4 Sybil Detection 12 3 Triad Significance Profile Analysis 14 3.1 Motivation 14 3.2 Twitter Dataset 18 3.3 Indegree and Outdegree of Dataset 20 3.4 Twitter spammer Detection with TSP 22 3.5 TSP-Filtering 27 3.6 Performance Evaluation of TSP-Filtering 29 4 Hierarchical Homophily Analysis 33 4.1 Motivation 33 4.2 Hierarchical Homophily in OSN 37 4.2.1 Basic Analysis of Datasets 39 4.2.2 Status gap distribution and Assortativity 44 4.2.3 Hierarchical gap distribution 49 4.3 Performance Evaluation of HH-Filtering 53 5 Overall Performance Evaluation 58 6 Conclusion 63 Bibliography 65Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore