108,134 research outputs found
Coverage, Matching, and Beyond: New Results on Budgeted Mechanism Design
We study a type of reverse (procurement) auction problems in the presence of
budget constraints. The general algorithmic problem is to purchase a set of
resources, which come at a cost, so as not to exceed a given budget and at the
same time maximize a given valuation function. This framework captures the
budgeted version of several well known optimization problems, and when the
resources are owned by strategic agents the goal is to design truthful and
budget feasible mechanisms, i.e. elicit the true cost of the resources and
ensure the payments of the mechanism do not exceed the budget. Budget
feasibility introduces more challenges in mechanism design, and we study
instantiations of this problem for certain classes of submodular and XOS
valuation functions. We first obtain mechanisms with an improved approximation
ratio for weighted coverage valuations, a special class of submodular functions
that has already attracted attention in previous works. We then provide a
general scheme for designing randomized and deterministic polynomial time
mechanisms for a class of XOS problems. This class contains problems whose
feasible set forms an independence system (a more general structure than
matroids), and some representative problems include, among others, finding
maximum weighted matchings, maximum weighted matroid members, and maximum
weighted 3D-matchings. For most of these problems, only randomized mechanisms
with very high approximation ratios were known prior to our results
Interdiction Problems on Planar Graphs
Interdiction problems are leader-follower games in which the leader is
allowed to delete a certain number of edges from the graph in order to
maximally impede the follower, who is trying to solve an optimization problem
on the impeded graph. We introduce approximation algorithms and strong
NP-completeness results for interdiction problems on planar graphs. We give a
multiplicative -approximation for the maximum matching
interdiction problem on weighted planar graphs. The algorithm runs in
pseudo-polynomial time for each fixed . We also show that
weighted maximum matching interdiction, budget-constrained flow improvement,
directed shortest path interdiction, and minimum perfect matching interdiction
are strongly NP-complete on planar graphs. To our knowledge, our
budget-constrained flow improvement result is the first planar NP-completeness
proof that uses a one-vertex crossing gadget.Comment: 25 pages, 9 figures. Extended abstract in APPROX-RANDOM 201
A Variant of the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem
We study a natural extension of the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem
(MWIS), one of the most studied optimization problems in Graph algorithms. We
are given a graph , a weight function ,
a budget function , and a positive integer .
The weight (resp. budget) of a subset of vertices is the sum of weights (resp.
budgets) of the vertices in the subset. A -budgeted independent set in
is a subset of vertices, such that no pair of vertices in that subset are
adjacent, and the budget of the subset is at most . The goal is to find a
-budgeted independent set in such that its weight is maximum among all
the -budgeted independent sets in . We refer to this problem as MWBIS.
Being a generalization of MWIS, MWBIS also has several applications in
Scheduling, Wireless networks and so on. Due to the hardness results implied
from MWIS, we study the MWBIS problem in several special classes of graphs. We
design exact algorithms for trees, forests, cycle graphs, and interval graphs.
In unweighted case we design an approximation algorithm for -claw free
graphs whose approximation ratio () is competitive with the approximation
ratio () of MWIS (unweighted). Furthermore, we extend Baker's
technique \cite{Baker83} to get a PTAS for MWBIS in planar graphs.Comment: 18 page
Bi-Criteria and Approximation Algorithms for Restricted Matchings
In this work we study approximation algorithms for the \textit{Bounded Color
Matching} problem (a.k.a. Restricted Matching problem) which is defined as
follows: given a graph in which each edge has a color and a profit
, we want to compute a maximum (cardinality or profit)
matching in which no more than edges of color are
present. This kind of problems, beside the theoretical interest on its own
right, emerges in multi-fiber optical networking systems, where we interpret
each unique wavelength that can travel through the fiber as a color class and
we would like to establish communication between pairs of systems. We study
approximation and bi-criteria algorithms for this problem which are based on
linear programming techniques and, in particular, on polyhedral
characterizations of the natural linear formulation of the problem. In our
setting, we allow violations of the bounds and we model our problem as a
bi-criteria problem: we have two objectives to optimize namely (a) to maximize
the profit (maximum matching) while (b) minimizing the violation of the color
bounds. We prove how we can "beat" the integrality gap of the natural linear
programming formulation of the problem by allowing only a slight violation of
the color bounds. In particular, our main result is \textit{constant}
approximation bounds for both criteria of the corresponding bi-criteria
optimization problem
Matroid and Knapsack Center Problems
In the classic -center problem, we are given a metric graph, and the
objective is to open nodes as centers such that the maximum distance from
any vertex to its closest center is minimized. In this paper, we consider two
important generalizations of -center, the matroid center problem and the
knapsack center problem. Both problems are motivated by recent content
distribution network applications. Our contributions can be summarized as
follows:
1. We consider the matroid center problem in which the centers are required
to form an independent set of a given matroid. We show this problem is NP-hard
even on a line. We present a 3-approximation algorithm for the problem on
general metrics. We also consider the outlier version of the problem where a
given number of vertices can be excluded as the outliers from the solution. We
present a 7-approximation for the outlier version.
2. We consider the (multi-)knapsack center problem in which the centers are
required to satisfy one (or more) knapsack constraint(s). It is known that the
knapsack center problem with a single knapsack constraint admits a
3-approximation. However, when there are at least two knapsack constraints, we
show this problem is not approximable at all. To complement the hardness
result, we present a polynomial time algorithm that gives a 3-approximate
solution such that one knapsack constraint is satisfied and the others may be
violated by at most a factor of . We also obtain a 3-approximation
for the outlier version that may violate the knapsack constraint by
.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper is accepted to IPCO 201
Comparison of different objective functions for parameterization of simple respiration models
The eddy covariance measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes collected around the world offer a rich source for detailed data analysis. Simple, aggregated models are attractive tools for gap filling, budget calculation, and upscaling in space and time. Key in the application of these models is their parameterization and a robust estimate of the uncertainty and reliability of their predictions. In this study we compared the use of ordinary least squares (OLS) and weighted absolute deviations (WAD, which is the objective function yielding maximum likelihood parameter estimates with a double exponential error distribution) as objective functions within the annual parameterization of two respiration models: the Q10 model and the Lloyd and Taylor model. We introduce a new parameterization method based on two nonparametric tests in which model deviation (Wilcoxon test) and residual trend analyses (Spearman test) are combined. A data set of 9 years of flux measurements was used for this study. The analysis showed that the choice of the objective function is crucial, resulting in differences in the estimated annual respiration budget of up to 40%. The objective function should be tested thoroughly to determine whether it is appropriate for the application for which the model will be used. If simple models are used to estimate a respiration budget, a trend test is essential to achieve unbiased estimates over the year. The analyses also showed that the parameters of the Lloyd and Taylor model are highly correlated and difficult to determine precisely, thereby limiting the physiological interpretability of the parameter
- β¦