15,089 research outputs found
Energy-efficient algorithms for non-preemptive speed-scaling
We improve complexity bounds for energy-efficient speed scheduling problems
for both the single processor and multi-processor cases. Energy conservation
has become a major concern, so revisiting traditional scheduling problems to
take into account the energy consumption has been part of the agenda of the
scheduling community for the past few years.
We consider the energy minimizing speed scaling problem introduced by Yao et
al. where we wish to schedule a set of jobs, each with a release date, deadline
and work volume, on a set of identical processors. The processors may change
speed as a function of time and the energy they consume is the th power
of its speed. The objective is then to find a feasible schedule which minimizes
the total energy used.
We show that in the setting with an arbitrary number of processors where all
work volumes are equal, there is a approximation algorithm, where
is the generalized Bell number. This is the first constant
factor algorithm for this problem. This algorithm extends to general unequal
processor-dependent work volumes, up to losing a factor of
in the approximation, where is the maximum
ratio between two work volumes. We then show this latter problem is APX-hard,
even in the special case when all release dates and deadlines are equal and
is 4.
In the single processor case, we introduce a new linear programming
formulation of speed scaling and prove that its integrality gap is at most
. As a corollary, we obtain a
approximation algorithm where there is a single processor, improving on the
previous best bound of
when
Throughput Maximization in Multiprocessor Speed-Scaling
We are given a set of jobs that have to be executed on a set of
speed-scalable machines that can vary their speeds dynamically using the energy
model introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS'95]. Every job is characterized by
its release date , its deadline , its processing volume if
is executed on machine and its weight . We are also given a budget
of energy and our objective is to maximize the weighted throughput, i.e.
the total weight of jobs that are completed between their respective release
dates and deadlines. We propose a polynomial-time approximation algorithm where
the preemption of the jobs is allowed but not their migration. Our algorithm
uses a primal-dual approach on a linearized version of a convex program with
linear constraints. Furthermore, we present two optimal algorithms for the
non-preemptive case where the number of machines is bounded by a fixed
constant. More specifically, we consider: {\em (a)} the case of identical
processing volumes, i.e. for every and , for which we
present a polynomial-time algorithm for the unweighted version, which becomes a
pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for the weighted throughput version, and {\em
(b)} the case of agreeable instances, i.e. for which if and only
if , for which we present a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm. Both
algorithms are based on a discretization of the problem and the use of dynamic
programming
A -Competitive Algorithm for Scheduling Packets with Deadlines
In the online packet scheduling problem with deadlines (PacketScheduling, for
short), the goal is to schedule transmissions of packets that arrive over time
in a network switch and need to be sent across a link. Each packet has a
deadline, representing its urgency, and a non-negative weight, that represents
its priority. Only one packet can be transmitted in any time slot, so, if the
system is overloaded, some packets will inevitably miss their deadlines and be
dropped. In this scenario, the natural objective is to compute a transmission
schedule that maximizes the total weight of packets which are successfully
transmitted. The problem is inherently online, with the scheduling decisions
made without the knowledge of future packet arrivals. The central problem
concerning PacketScheduling, that has been a subject of intensive study since
2001, is to determine the optimal competitive ratio of online algorithms,
namely the worst-case ratio between the optimum total weight of a schedule
(computed by an offline algorithm) and the weight of a schedule computed by a
(deterministic) online algorithm.
We solve this open problem by presenting a -competitive online
algorithm for PacketScheduling (where is the golden ratio),
matching the previously established lower bound.Comment: Major revision of the analysis and some other parts of the paper.
Another revision will follo
Online Contention Resolution Schemes
We introduce a new rounding technique designed for online optimization
problems, which is related to contention resolution schemes, a technique
initially introduced in the context of submodular function maximization. Our
rounding technique, which we call online contention resolution schemes (OCRSs),
is applicable to many online selection problems, including Bayesian online
selection, oblivious posted pricing mechanisms, and stochastic probing models.
It allows for handling a wide set of constraints, and shares many strong
properties of offline contention resolution schemes. In particular, OCRSs for
different constraint families can be combined to obtain an OCRS for their
intersection. Moreover, we can approximately maximize submodular functions in
the online settings we consider.
We, thus, get a broadly applicable framework for several online selection
problems, which improves on previous approaches in terms of the types of
constraints that can be handled, the objective functions that can be dealt
with, and the assumptions on the strength of the adversary. Furthermore, we
resolve two open problems from the literature; namely, we present the first
constant-factor constrained oblivious posted price mechanism for matroid
constraints, and the first constant-factor algorithm for weighted stochastic
probing with deadlines.Comment: 33 pages. To appear in SODA 201
- …