2,706 research outputs found
An Even Faster and More Unifying Algorithm for Comparing Trees via Unbalanced Bipartite Matchings
A widely used method for determining the similarity of two labeled trees is
to compute a maximum agreement subtree of the two trees. Previous work on this
similarity measure is only concerned with the comparison of labeled trees of
two special kinds, namely, uniformly labeled trees (i.e., trees with all their
nodes labeled by the same symbol) and evolutionary trees (i.e., leaf-labeled
trees with distinct symbols for distinct leaves). This paper presents an
algorithm for comparing trees that are labeled in an arbitrary manner. In
addition to this generality, this algorithm is faster than the previous
algorithms.
Another contribution of this paper is on maximum weight bipartite matchings.
We show how to speed up the best known matching algorithms when the input
graphs are node-unbalanced or weight-unbalanced. Based on these enhancements,
we obtain an efficient algorithm for a new matching problem called the
hierarchical bipartite matching problem, which is at the core of our maximum
agreement subtree algorithm.Comment: To appear in Journal of Algorithm
On unrooted and root-uncertain variants of several well-known phylogenetic network problems
The hybridization number problem requires us to embed a set of binary rooted
phylogenetic trees into a binary rooted phylogenetic network such that the
number of nodes with indegree two is minimized. However, from a biological
point of view accurately inferring the root location in a phylogenetic tree is
notoriously difficult and poor root placement can artificially inflate the
hybridization number. To this end we study a number of relaxed variants of this
problem. We start by showing that the fundamental problem of determining
whether an \emph{unrooted} phylogenetic network displays (i.e. embeds) an
\emph{unrooted} phylogenetic tree, is NP-hard. On the positive side we show
that this problem is FPT in reticulation number. In the rooted case the
corresponding FPT result is trivial, but here we require more subtle
argumentation. Next we show that the hybridization number problem for unrooted
networks (when given two unrooted trees) is equivalent to the problem of
computing the Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance of the two unrooted
trees. In the third part of the paper we consider the "root uncertain" variant
of hybridization number. Here we are free to choose the root location in each
of a set of unrooted input trees such that the hybridization number of the
resulting rooted trees is minimized. On the negative side we show that this
problem is APX-hard. On the positive side, we show that the problem is FPT in
the hybridization number, via kernelization, for any number of input trees.Comment: 28 pages, 8 Figure
Kernelizations for the hybridization number problem on multiple nonbinary trees
Given a finite set , a collection of rooted phylogenetic
trees on and an integer , the Hybridization Number problem asks if there
exists a phylogenetic network on that displays all trees from
and has reticulation number at most . We show two kernelization algorithms
for Hybridization Number, with kernel sizes and
respectively, with the number of input trees and their maximum
outdegree. Experiments on simulated data demonstrate the practical relevance of
these kernelization algorithms. In addition, we present an -time
algorithm, with and some computable function of
- …