Life Cycle Analysis and Optimization of Wireless Charging Technology to Enhance Sustainability of Electric and Autonomous Vehicle Fleets

The transportation sector is undergoing a major transformation. Emerging technologies play indispensable roles in driving this mobility shift, including vehicle electrification, connection, and automation. Among them, wireless power transfer (WPT) technology, or commonly known as wireless charging technology, is in the spotlight in recent years for its applicability in charging electric vehicles (EVs). On one hand, WPT for EVs can solve some of the key challenges in EV development, by: (1) reducing range anxiety of EV owners by allowing “charging while driving”; and (2) downsizing the EV battery while still fulfilling the same trip distance. More en-route wireless charging opportunities result in battery downsizing, which reduces the high EV price and vehicle weight and improves fuel economy. On the other hand, WPT infrastructure deployment is expensive and resource-intensive, and results in significant economic, environmental, and energy burdens, which can offset these benefits. This research aims to develop and apply a life cycle analysis and optimization framework to examine the role of wireless charging technology in driving sustainable mobility. This research highlights the technology trade-offs and bridges the gap between technology development and deployment by establishing an integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle cost (LCA-LCC) model framework to characterize and evaluate the economic, environmental, and energy performance of WPT EV systems vs. conventional plug-in charging EV systems. Life cycle optimization (LCO) techniques are used to improve the life cycle performance of WPT EV fleets. Based on case studies, this research draws observations and conditions under which wireless charging technology has potential to improve life cycle environmental, energy, and economic performance of electric vehicle fleets. This study begins with developing LCA-LCC and LCO models to evaluate stationary wireless power transfer (SWPT) for transit bus systems. Based on a case study of Ann Arbor bus systems, the wirelessly charged battery can be downsized to 27–44% of a plug-in charged battery, resulting in vehicle lightweighting and fuel economy improvement in the use phase that cancels out the burdens of large-scale infrastructure. Optimal siting strategies of WPT bus charging stations reduced life cycle costs, greenhouse gases (GHG), and energy by up to 13%, 8%, and 8%, respectively, compared to extreme cases of “no charger at any bus stop” and “chargers at every stop”. Next, the LCA-LCC and LCO model framework is applied to evaluate the economic, energy, and environmental feasibility of dynamic wireless power transfer (DWPT) for charging passenger cars on highways and urban roadways. A case study of Washtenaw County indicates that optimal deployment of DWPT electrifying up to about 3% of total roadway lane-miles reduces life cycle GHG emissions and energy by up to 9.0% and 6.8%, respectively, and enables downsizing of the EV battery capacity by up to 48% compared to the non-DWPT scenarios and boosts EV market penetration to around 50% of all vehicles in 20 years. Finally, synergies of WPT and autonomous driving technologies in enhancing sustainable mobility are demonstrated using the LCA framework. Compared to a plug-in charging battery electric vehicle system, a wireless charging and shared automated battery electric vehicle (W+SABEV) system will pay back GHG emission burdens of additional infrastructure deployment within 5 years if the wireless charging utility factor is above 19%.PHDNatural Resources & EnvironmentUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147602/1/bizc_1.pd

Towards Transportation Digital Twin Systems for Traffic Safety and Mobility Applications: A Review

Digital twin (DT) systems aim to create virtual replicas of physical objects that are updated in real time with their physical counterparts and evolve alongside the physical assets throughout its lifecycle. Transportation systems are poised to significantly benefit from this new paradigm. In particular, DT technology can augment the capabilities of intelligent transportation systems. However, the development and deployment of networkwide transportation DT systems need to take into consideration the scale and dynamic nature of future connected and automated transportation systems. Motivated by the need of understanding the requirements and challenges involved in developing and implementing such systems, this paper proposes a hierarchical concept for a Transportation DT (TDT) system starting from individual transportation assets and building up to the entire networkwide TDT. A reference architecture is proposed for TDT systems that could be used as a guide in developing TDT systems at any scale within the presented hierarchical concept. In addition, several use cases are presented based upon the reference architecture which illustrate the utility of a TDT system from transportation safety, mobility and environmental applications perspective. This is followed by a review of current studies in the domain of TDT systems. Finally, the critical challenges and promising future research directions in TDT are discussed to overcome existing barriers to realize a safe and operationally efficient connected and automated transportation systems.Comment: 15 pages, 2 figures; corrected issue in author(s) fiel

Strategic Infrastructure Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

Compared with conventional human-driven vehicles (HVs), AVs have various potential benefits, such as increasing road capacity and lowering vehicular fuel consumption and emissions. Road infrastructure management, adaptation, and upgrade plays a key role in promoting the adoption and benefit realization of AVs.This dissertation investigated several strategic infrastructure planning problems for AVs. First, it studied the potential impact of AVs on the congestion patterns of transportation networks. Second, it investigated the strategic planning problem for a new form of managed lanes for autonomous vehicles, designated as autonomous-vehicle/toll lanes, which are freely accessible to autonomous vehicles while allowing human-driven vehicles to utilize the lanes by paying a toll.This new type of managed lanes has the potential of increasing traffic capacity and fully utilizing the traffic capacity by selling redundant road capacity to HVs. Last, this dissertation studied the strategic infrastructure planning problem for an infrastructure-enabled autonomous driving system. The system combines vehicles and infrastructure in the realization of autonomous driving. Equipped with roadside sensor and control systems, a regular road can be upgraded into an automated road providing autonomous driving service to vehicles. Vehicles only need to carry minimum required on-board devices to enable their autonomous driving on an automated road. The costs of vehicles can thus be significantly reduced

Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies

[EN] The market for electric vehicles (EVs) has grown with each year, and EVs are considered to be a proper solution for the mitigation of urban pollution. So far, not much attention has been devoted to the use of EVs for public transportation, such as taxis and buses. However, a massive introduction of electric taxis (ETs) and electric buses (EBs) could generate issues in the grid. The challenges are different from those of private EVs, as their required load is much higher and the related time constraints must be considered with much more attention. These issues have begun to be studied within the last few years. This paper presents a review of the different approaches that have been proposed by various authors, to mitigate the impact of EBs and ETs on the future smart grid. Furthermore, some projects with regard to the integration of ETs and EBs around the world are presented. Some guidelines for future works are also proposed.This research was funded by the project SIS.JCG.19.03 of Universidad de las Americas, Ecuador.Clairand-Gómez, J.; Guerra-Terán, P.; Serrano-Guerrero, JX.; González-Rodríguez, M.; Escrivá-Escrivá, G. (2019). Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies. Energies. 12(16):1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163114S1221216Emadi, A. (2011). Transportation 2.0. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 9(4), 18-29. doi:10.1109/mpe.2011.941320Fahimi, B., Kwasinski, A., Davoudi, A., Balog, R., & Kiani, M. (2011). Charge It! IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 9(4), 54-64. doi:10.1109/mpe.2011.941321Yilmaz, M., & Krein, P. T. (2013). Review of Battery Charger Topologies, Charging Power Levels, and Infrastructure for Plug-In Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 28(5), 2151-2169. doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2212917Tagliaferri, C., Evangelisti, S., Acconcia, F., Domenech, T., Ekins, P., Barletta, D., & Lettieri, P. (2016). Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: A cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 112, 298-309. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.07.003Zackrisson, M., Fransson, K., Hildenbrand, J., Lampic, G., & O’Dwyer, C. (2016). Life cycle assessment of lithium-air battery cells. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 299-311. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.104Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Lin, B., Liu, H., Wang, R., Zhou, B., & Hao, J. (2012). Energy consumption and CO2 emission impacts of vehicle electrification in three developed regions of China. Energy Policy, 48, 537-550. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.060Shen, W., Han, W., Chock, D., Chai, Q., & Zhang, A. (2012). Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China. Energy Policy, 49, 296-307. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.038Wang, R., Wu, Y., Ke, W., Zhang, S., Zhou, B., & Hao, J. (2015). Can propulsion and fuel diversity for the bus fleet achieve the win–win strategy of energy conservation and environmental protection? Applied Energy, 147, 92-103. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.107Clement-Nyns, K., Haesen, E., & Driesen, J. (2010). The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(1), 371-380. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2036481Shafiee, S., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Rastegar, M. (2013). Investigating the Impacts of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Power Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(3), 1351-1360. doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2251483Pieltain Fernandez, L., Gomez San Roman, T., Cossent, R., Mateo Domingo, C., & Frias, P. (2011). Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(1), 206-213. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2049133Lucas, A., Bonavitacola, F., Kotsakis, E., & Fulli, G. (2015). Grid harmonic impact of multiple electric vehicle fast charging. Electric Power Systems Research, 127, 13-21. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.012Turker, H., Bacha, S., Chatroux, D., & Hably, A. (2012). Low-Voltage Transformer Loss-of-Life Assessments for a High Penetration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs). IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 27(3), 1323-1331. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2012.2193423Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005). Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue. Journal of Power Sources, 144(1), 268-279. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.025Guille, C., & Gross, G. (2009). A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4379-4390. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053Geng, Z., Conejo, A. J., Chen, Q., Xia, Q., & Kang, C. (2017). Electricity production scheduling under uncertainty: Max social welfare vs. min emission vs. max renewable production. Applied Energy, 193, 540-549. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.051Verbruggen, A., Fischedick, M., Moomaw, W., Weir, T., Nadaï, A., Nilsson, L. J., … Sathaye, J. (2010). Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: Conceptual issues. Energy Policy, 38(2), 850-861. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.036Oda, T., Aziz, M., Mitani, T., Watanabe, Y., & Kashiwagi, T. (2018). Mitigation of congestion related to quick charging of electric vehicles based on waiting time and cost–benefit analyses: A japanese case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 99-106. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.024Arkin, E. M., Carmi, P., Katz, M. J., Mitchell, J. S. B., & Segal, M. (2019). Locating battery charging stations to facilitate almost shortest paths. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 254, 10-16. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2018.07.019Gallardo-Lozano, J., Milanés-Montero, M. I., Guerrero-Martínez, M. A., & Romero-Cadaval, E. (2012). Electric vehicle battery charger for smart grids. Electric Power Systems Research, 90, 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2012.03.015Aziz, M., Oda, T., & Ito, M. (2016). Battery-assisted charging system for simultaneous charging of electric vehicles. Energy, 100, 82-90. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.069Mehboob, N., Restrepo, M., Canizares, C. A., Rosenberg, C., & Kazerani, M. (2019). Smart Operation of Electric Vehicles With Four-Quadrant Chargers Considering Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 2999-3009. doi:10.1109/tsg.2018.2816404García-Villalobos, J., Zamora, I., San Martín, J. I., Asensio, F. J., & Aperribay, V. (2014). Plug-in electric vehicles in electric distribution networks: A review of smart charging approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 717-731. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.040Richardson, D. B. (2013). Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 247-254. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.042Haidar, A. M. A., Muttaqi, K. M., & Sutanto, D. (2014). Technical challenges for electric power industries due to grid-integrated electric vehicles in low voltage distributions: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 689-700. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.025Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E.-K., Do, T. D., & Jung, J.-W. (2014). Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 501-516. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.031Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2015). Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks – A review. Journal of Power Sources, 277, 205-214. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020Tan, K. M., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., & Yong, J. Y. (2016). Integration of electric vehicles in smart grid: A review on vehicle to grid technologies and optimization techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 720-732. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.012Raslavičius, L., Azzopardi, B., Keršys, A., Starevičius, M., Bazaras, Ž., & Makaras, R. (2015). Electric vehicles challenges and opportunities: Lithuanian review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 786-800. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.076Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., Singh, B. S. M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., & Adnan, N. (2016). Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1039-1047. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353Faddel, S., Al-Awami, A., & Mohammed, O. (2018). Charge Control and Operation of Electric Vehicles in Power Grids: A Review. Energies, 11(4), 701. doi:10.3390/en11040701Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., & Tatari, O. (2016). Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1260-1276. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.051Kwan, S. C., & Hashim, J. H. (2016). A review on co-benefits of mass public transportation in climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.004Kolbe, K. (2019). Mitigating urban heat island effect and carbon dioxide emissions through different mobility concepts: Comparison of conventional vehicles with electric vehicles, hydrogen vehicles and public transportation. Transport Policy, 80, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.007Zalakeviciute, R., Rybarczyk, Y., López-Villada, J., & Diaz Suarez, M. V. (2018). Quantifying decade-long effects of fuel and traffic regulations on urban ambient PM 2.5 pollution in a mid-size South American city. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(1), 66-75. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2017.07.001Dell’ Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Cecin, P. (2011). The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy, 18(1), 217-227. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005Mahmoud, M., Garnett, R., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Electric buses: A review of alternative powertrains. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 673-684. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.019Nissan Leafhttps://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf/range-charging.htmlIntroducing the Fully Charged 2020 Kia Soul EVhttps://www.kia.com/us/en/content/vehicles/upcoming-vehicles/2020-soul-eve6https://en.byd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/e6_cutsheet.pdfTesla Model Shttps://www.tesla.com/modelsBushttps://en.byd.com/bus/40-electric-motor-coach/Urbino Electrichttps://www.solarisbus.com/en/vehicles/zero-emissions/urbino-electricVolvo 7900 Electrichttps://www.volvobuses.co.uk/en-gb/our-offering/buses/volvo-7900-electric/specifications.htmlCollin, R., Miao, Y., Yokochi, A., Enjeti, P., & von Jouanne, A. (2019). Advanced Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging Technologies. Energies, 12(10), 1839. doi:10.3390/en12101839Yang, Y., El Baghdadi, M., Lan, Y., Benomar, Y., Van Mierlo, J., & Hegazy, O. (2018). Design Methodology, Modeling, and Comparative Study of Wireless Power Transfer Systems for Electric Vehicles. Energies, 11(7), 1716. doi:10.3390/en11071716Bi, Z., Song, L., De Kleine, R., Mi, C. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2015). Plug-in vs. wireless charging: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system. Applied Energy, 146, 11-19. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.031Siqi Li, & Mi, C. C. (2015). Wireless Power Transfer for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 3(1), 4-17. doi:10.1109/jestpe.2014.2319453Musavi, F., & Eberle, W. (2014). Overview of wireless power transfer technologies for electric vehicle battery charging. IET Power Electronics, 7(1), 60-66. doi:10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0047Wang, Z., Wei, X., & Dai, H. (2015). Design and Control of a 3 kW Wireless Power Transfer System for Electric Vehicles. Energies, 9(1), 10. doi:10.3390/en9010010Sarker, M. R., Pandzic, H., & Ortega-Vazquez, M. A. (2015). Optimal Operation and Services Scheduling for an Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Station. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(2), 901-910. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2331560Adegbohun, F., von Jouanne, A., & Lee, K. (2019). Autonomous Battery Swapping System and Methodologies of Electric Vehicles. Energies, 12(4), 667. doi:10.3390/en12040667OPPChargeCommon Interface for Automated Charging of Hybrid Electric and Electric Commercial Vehicleshttps://www.oppcharge.org/dok/OPPCharge Specification 2nd edition 20190421.pdfFast Charging of Electric Vehicleshttps://www.oppcharge.orgJiang, C. X., Jing, Z. X., Cui, X. R., Ji, T. Y., & Wu, Q. H. (2018). Multiple agents and reinforcement learning for modelling charging loads of electric taxis. Applied Energy, 222, 158-168. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.164Fraile-Ardanuy, J., Castano-Solis, S., Álvaro-Hermana, R., Merino, J., & Castillo, Á. (2018). Using mobility information to perform a feasibility study and the evaluation of spatio-temporal energy demanded by an electric taxi fleet. Energy Conversion and Management, 157, 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.070Rao, R., Cai, H., & Xu, M. (2018). Modeling electric taxis’ charging behavior using real-world data. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(6), 452-460. doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1388887Litzlbauer, M. (2015). Technische Machbarkeitsanalyse einer rein elektrisch betriebenen Taxiflotte. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 132(3), 172-177. doi:10.1007/s00502-015-0296-3Liao, B., Li, L., Li, B., Mao, J., Yang, J., Wen, F., & Salam, M. A. (2016). Load modeling for electric taxi battery charging and swapping stations: Comparison studies. 2016 IEEE 2nd Annual Southern Power Electronics Conference (SPEC). doi:10.1109/spec.2016.7846135Zou, Y., Wei, S., Sun, F., Hu, X., & Shiao, Y. (2016). Large-scale deployment of electric taxis in Beijing: A real-world analysis. Energy, 100, 25-39. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.062Asamer, J., Reinthaler, M., Ruthmair, M., Straub, M., & Puchinger, J. (2016). Optimizing charging station locations for urban taxi providers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 233-246. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.014Yang, J., Dong, J., & Hu, L. (2017). A data-driven optimization-based approach for siting and sizing of electric taxi charging stations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 77, 462-477. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.014Jiang, C., Jing, Z., Ji, T., & Wu, Q. (2018). Optimal location of PEVCSs using MAS and ER approach. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12(20), 4377-4387. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1907Pan, A., Zhao, T., Yu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Deploying Public Charging Stations for Electric Taxis: A Charging Demand Simulation Embedded Approach. IEEE Access, 7, 17412-17424. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2894780Chen Lianfu, Zhang, W., Huang, Y., & Zhang, D. (2014). Research on the charging station service radius of electric taxis. 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific). doi:10.1109/itec-ap.2014.6941081Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Niu, L., & Jiang, J. (2015). Coordinated Charging Strategy for Electric Taxis in Temporal and Spatial Scale. Energies, 8(2), 1256-1272. doi:10.3390/en8021256Niu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). Charging Guidance of Electric Taxis Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2015/354952Yang, Z., Guo, T., You, P., Hou, Y., & Qin, S. J. (2019). Distributed Approach for Temporal–Spatial Charging Coordination of Plug-in Electric Taxi Fleet. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(6), 3185-3195. doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2879515Rossi, F., Iglesias, R., Alizadeh, M., & Pavone, M. (2020). On the Interaction Between Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems and the Power Network: Models and Coordination Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 7(1), 384-397. doi:10.1109/tcns.2019.2923384Liang, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, J., & Liu, W. (2017). An Optimal Operation Model and Ordered Charging/Discharging Strategy for Battery Swapping Stations. Sustainability, 9(5), 700. doi:10.3390/su9050700XU, X., YAO, L., ZENG, P., LIU, Y., & CAI, T. (2015). Architecture and performance analysis of a smart battery charging and swapping operation service network for electric vehicles in China. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 3(2), 259-268. doi:10.1007/s40565-015-0118-yJing, Z., Fang, L., Lin, S., & Shao, W. (2014). Modeling for electric taxi load and optimization model for charging/swapping facilities of electric taxi. 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific). doi:10.1109/itec-ap.2014.6941160Wang, Y., Ding, W., Huang, L., Wei, Z., Liu, H., & Stankovic, J. A. (2018). Toward Urban Electric Taxi Systems in Smart Cities: The Battery Swapping Challenge. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(3), 1946-1960. doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2774447You, P., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Low, S. H., & Sun, Y. (2016). Optimal Charging Schedule for a Battery Switching Station Serving Electric Buses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(5), 3473-3483. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2487273Yang, Z., Sun, L., Chen, J., Yang, Q., Chen, X., & Xing, K. (2014). Profit Maximization for Plug-In Electric Taxi With Uncertain Future Electricity Prices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(6), 3058-3068. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2311120Yang, Z., Sun, L., Ke, M., Shi, Z., & Chen, J. (2014). Optimal Charging Strategy for Plug-In Electric Taxi With Time-Varying Profits. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(6), 2787-2797. doi:10.1109/tsg.2014.2354473Yang, J., Xu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2017). Regulating the Collective Charging Load of Electric Taxi Fleet via Real-Time Pricing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3694-3703. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2643685Du, R., Liao, G., Zhang, E., & Wang, J. (2018). Battery charge or change, which is better? A case from Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 698-711. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.021Yang, J., Dong, J., Lin, Z., & Hu, L. (2016). Predicting market potential and environmental benefits of deploying electric taxis in Nanjing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 68-81. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.037You, P., Low, S. H., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Lingkun Fu. (2016). Real-time recommendation algorithm of battery swapping stations for electric taxis. 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). doi:10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741620Dai, Q., Cai, T., Duan, S., & Zhao, F. (2014). Stochastic Modeling and Forecasting of Load Demand for Electric Bus Battery-Swap Station. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29(4), 1909-1917. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2014.2308990Mohamed, M., Farag, H., El-Taweel, N., & Ferguson, M. (2017). Simulation of electric buses on a full transit network: Operational feasibility and grid impact analysis. Electric Power Systems Research, 142, 163-175. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2016.09.032Zhang, X. (2018). Short-Term Load Forecasting for Electric Bus Charging Stations Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Least Squares Support Vector Machine Optimized by Wolf Pack Algorithm. Energies, 11(6), 1449. doi:10.3390/en11061449Ding, H., Hu, Z., & Song, Y. (2015). Value of the energy storage system in an electric bus fast charging station. Applied Energy, 157, 630-639. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.058Qin, N., Gusrialdi, A., Paul Brooker, R., & T-Raissi, A. (2016). Numerical analysis of electric bus fast charging strategies for demand charge reduction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 386-396. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.014Huimiao Chen, Zechun Hu, Zhiwei Xu, Jiayi Li, Honggang Zhang, Xue Xia, … Mingwei Peng. (2016). Coordinated charging strategies for electric bus fast charging stations. 2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). doi:10.1109/appeec.2016.7779677Chen, H., Hu, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, H. (2018). Coordinated charging and discharging strategies for plug-in electric bus fast charging station with energy storage system. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12(9), 2019-2028. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0636Gao, Y., Guo, S., Ren, J., Zhao, Z., Ehsan, A., & Zheng, Y. (2018). An Electric Bus Power Consumption Model and Optimization of Charging Scheduling Concerning Multi-External Factors. Energies, 11(8), 2060. doi:10.3390/en11082060Cheng, Y., & Tao, J. (2018). Optimization of A Micro Energy Network Integrated with Electric Bus Battery Swapping Station and Distributed PV. 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2). doi:10.1109/ei2.2018.8582236Sebastiani, M. T., Luders, R., & Fonseca, K. V. O. (2016). Evaluating Electric Bus Operation for a Real-World BRT Public Transportation Using Simulation Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(10), 2777-2786. doi:10.1109/tits.2016.2525800Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Xu, J., & Barclay, N. (2017). Optimal recharging scheduling for urban electric buses: A case study in Davis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 100, 115-132. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2017.01.001Liu, Z., Song, Z., & He, Y. (2018). Planning of Fast-Charging Stations for a Battery Electric Bus System under Energy Consumption Uncertainty. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 96-107. doi:10.1177/0361198118772953Leou, R.-C., & Hung, J.-J. (2017). Optimal Charging Schedule Planning and Economic Analysis for Electric Bus Charging Stations. Energies, 10(4), 483. doi:10.3390/en10040483Bak, D.-B., Bak, J.-S., & Kim, S.-Y. (2018). Strategies for Implementing Public Service Electric Bus Lines by Charging Type in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3386. doi:10.3390/su10103386Chen, Z., Yin, Y., & Song, Z. (2018). A cost-competitiveness analysis of charging infrastructure for electric bus operations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 93, 351-366. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.006Cheng, Y., Wang, W., Ding, Z., & He, Z. (2019). Electric bus fast charging station resource planning consid

An Investigation of Life Cycle Sustainability Implications of Emerging Heavy-Duty Truck Technologies in the Age of Autonomy

Heavy-duty trucks (HDTs) play a central role in U.S. freight transportation, carrying most of the goods across the country. The projected increase in freight activity (e.g. truck-miles-traveled) raises concerns regarding the potential sustainability impacts of the U.S. freight industry, marking HDTs as an ideal domain for improving the sustainability performance of U.S. freight transportation. However, the transition to sustainable trucking is a challenging task, for which multiple sustainability objectives must be considered and addressed under a variety of emerging HDT technologies while composing a sustainable HDT fleet. To gain insights into the sustainability implications of emerging HDT technologies as well as how they can be adopted by freight organizations, given their implications, this research employed an integrated approach composed of methods and techniques, grounded in sustainability science, operations research, and statistical learning theory, to provide a scientific means with public and private organizations to increase the effectiveness of policies and strategies. The research has contributed to the scientific body of knowledge in three useful ways; (1) by comprehensively analyzing HDT electrification based on regional differences in power generation practices and price forecasts, (2) by conducting the first life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) on HDT automation and electrification, and (3) providing a case study of an unsupervised machine learning application for sustainability science. Consequently, the research has found that, given the transformation of the U.S. energy system towards renewables, automation and electrification of HDTs offer significant potential for improving the sustainability performance of these vehicles, especially in terms of global warming potential, life cycle costs, gross domestic product, import independence, and income generation. The research has also found that, under the prevailing techno-economic circumstances and except for energy security reasons, natural gas as a transportation fuel option for freight trucks is by almost no means a viable alternative to diesel