80,498 research outputs found
An Architectural Approach to Ensuring Consistency in Hierarchical Execution
Hierarchical task decomposition is a method used in many agent systems to
organize agent knowledge. This work shows how the combination of a hierarchy
and persistent assertions of knowledge can lead to difficulty in maintaining
logical consistency in asserted knowledge. We explore the problematic
consequences of persistent assumptions in the reasoning process and introduce
novel potential solutions. Having implemented one of the possible solutions,
Dynamic Hierarchical Justification, its effectiveness is demonstrated with an
empirical analysis
Flexible Invariants Through Semantic Collaboration
Modular reasoning about class invariants is challenging in the presence of
dependencies among collaborating objects that need to maintain global
consistency. This paper presents semantic collaboration: a novel methodology to
specify and reason about class invariants of sequential object-oriented
programs, which models dependencies between collaborating objects by semantic
means. Combined with a simple ownership mechanism and useful default schemes,
semantic collaboration achieves the flexibility necessary to reason about
complicated inter-object dependencies but requires limited annotation burden
when applied to standard specification patterns. The methodology is implemented
in AutoProof, our program verifier for the Eiffel programming language (but it
is applicable to any language supporting some form of representation
invariants). An evaluation on several challenge problems proposed in the
literature demonstrates that it can handle a variety of idiomatic collaboration
patterns, and is more widely applicable than the existing invariant
methodologies.Comment: 22 page
PriCL: Creating a Precedent A Framework for Reasoning about Privacy Case Law
We introduce PriCL: the first framework for expressing and automatically
reasoning about privacy case law by means of precedent. PriCL is parametric in
an underlying logic for expressing world properties, and provides support for
court decisions, their justification, the circumstances in which the
justification applies as well as court hierarchies. Moreover, the framework
offers a tight connection between privacy case law and the notion of norms that
underlies existing rule-based privacy research. In terms of automation, we
identify the major reasoning tasks for privacy cases such as deducing legal
permissions or extracting norms. For solving these tasks, we provide generic
algorithms that have particularly efficient realizations within an expressive
underlying logic. Finally, we derive a definition of deducibility based on
legal concepts and subsequently propose an equivalent characterization in terms
of logic satisfiability.Comment: Extended versio
Beyond rules: The next generation of expert systems
The PARAGON Representation, Management, and Manipulation system is introduced. The concepts of knowledge representation, knowledge management, and knowledge manipulation are combined in a comprehensive system for solving real world problems requiring high levels of expertise in a real time environment. In most applications the complexity of the problem and the representation used to describe the domain knowledge tend to obscure the information from which solutions are derived. This inhibits the acquisition of domain knowledge verification/validation, places severe constraints on the ability to extend and maintain a knowledge base while making generic problem solving strategies difficult to develop. A unique hybrid system was developed to overcome these traditional limitations
CBR and MBR techniques: review for an application in the emergencies domain
The purpose of this document is to provide an in-depth analysis of current reasoning engine practice and the integration strategies of Case Based Reasoning and Model Based Reasoning that will be used in the design and development of the RIMSAT system.
RIMSAT (Remote Intelligent Management Support and Training) is a European Commission funded project designed to:
a.. Provide an innovative, 'intelligent', knowledge based solution aimed at improving the quality of critical decisions
b.. Enhance the competencies and responsiveness of individuals and organisations involved in highly complex, safety critical incidents - irrespective of their location.
In other words, RIMSAT aims to design and implement a decision support system that using Case Base Reasoning as well as Model Base Reasoning technology is applied in the management of emergency situations.
This document is part of a deliverable for RIMSAT project, and although it has been done in close contact with the requirements of the project, it provides an overview wide enough for providing a state of the art in integration strategies between CBR and MBR technologies.Postprint (published version
Seven ways to improve example-based single image super resolution
In this paper we present seven techniques that everybody should know to
improve example-based single image super resolution (SR): 1) augmentation of
data, 2) use of large dictionaries with efficient search structures, 3)
cascading, 4) image self-similarities, 5) back projection refinement, 6)
enhanced prediction by consistency check, and 7) context reasoning. We validate
our seven techniques on standard SR benchmarks (i.e. Set5, Set14, B100) and
methods (i.e. A+, SRCNN, ANR, Zeyde, Yang) and achieve substantial
improvements.The techniques are widely applicable and require no changes or
only minor adjustments of the SR methods. Moreover, our Improved A+ (IA) method
sets new state-of-the-art results outperforming A+ by up to 0.9dB on average
PSNR whilst maintaining a low time complexity.Comment: 9 page
Probabilities on Sentences in an Expressive Logic
Automated reasoning about uncertain knowledge has many applications. One
difficulty when developing such systems is the lack of a completely
satisfactory integration of logic and probability. We address this problem
directly. Expressive languages like higher-order logic are ideally suited for
representing and reasoning about structured knowledge. Uncertain knowledge can
be modeled by using graded probabilities rather than binary truth-values. The
main technical problem studied in this paper is the following: Given a set of
sentences, each having some probability of being true, what probability should
be ascribed to other (query) sentences? A natural wish-list, among others, is
that the probability distribution (i) is consistent with the knowledge base,
(ii) allows for a consistent inference procedure and in particular (iii)
reduces to deductive logic in the limit of probabilities being 0 and 1, (iv)
allows (Bayesian) inductive reasoning and (v) learning in the limit and in
particular (vi) allows confirmation of universally quantified
hypotheses/sentences. We translate this wish-list into technical requirements
for a prior probability and show that probabilities satisfying all our criteria
exist. We also give explicit constructions and several general
characterizations of probabilities that satisfy some or all of the criteria and
various (counter) examples. We also derive necessary and sufficient conditions
for extending beliefs about finitely many sentences to suitable probabilities
over all sentences, and in particular least dogmatic or least biased ones. We
conclude with a brief outlook on how the developed theory might be used and
approximated in autonomous reasoning agents. Our theory is a step towards a
globally consistent and empirically satisfactory unification of probability and
logic.Comment: 52 LaTeX pages, 64 definiton/theorems/etc, presented at conference
Progic 2011 in New Yor
- …