94 research outputs found

    Materials Screening for the Discovery of New Half-Heuslers: Machine Learning versus Ab Initio Methods

    Full text link
    Machine learning (ML) is increasingly becoming a helpful tool in the search for novel functional compounds. Here we use classification via random forests to predict the stability of half-Heusler (HH) compounds, using only experimentally reported compounds as a training set. Cross-validation yields an excellent agreement between the fraction of compounds classified as stable and the actual fraction of truly stable compounds in the ICSD. The ML model is then employed to screen 71,178 different 1:1:1 compositions, yielding 481 likely stable candidates. The predicted stability of HH compounds from three previous high throughput ab initio studies is critically analyzed from the perspective of the alternative ML approach. The incomplete consistency among the three separate ab initio studies and between them and the ML predictions suggests that additional factors beyond those considered by ab initio phase stability calculations might be determinant to the stability of the compounds. Such factors can include configurational entropies and quasiharmonic contributions.Comment: 11 pages, 5 figures, 2 table

    Pressure-induced Superconductivity and Structure Phase Transition in SnAs-based Zintl Compound SrSn2As2

    Full text link
    Layered SnAs-based Zintl compounds exhibit a distinctive electronic structure, igniting extensive research efforts in areas of superconductivity, topological insulators and quantum magnetism. In this paper, we systematically investigate the crystal structures and electronic properties of the Zintl compound SrSn2As2 under high-pressure. At approximately 20.8 GPa, pressure-induced superconductivity is observed in SrSn2As2 with a characteristic dome-like evolution of Tc. Theoretical calculations together with high pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy have identified that SrSn2As2 undergoes a structural transformation from a trigonal to a monoclinic structure. Beyond 28.3 GPa, the superconducting transition temperature is suppressed due to a reduction of the density of state at the Fermi level. The discovery of pressure-induced superconductivity, accompanied by structural transitions in SrSn2As2, greatly expands the physical properties of layered SnAs-based compounds and provides a new ground states upon compression.Comment: 15 pages, 6 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2307.1562

    Chemical Synthesis and Materials Discovery

    Full text link
    Functional materials impact every area of our lives ranging from electronic and computing devices to transportation and health. In this Perspective, we examine the relationship between synthetic discoveries and the scientific breakthroughs that they have enabled. By tracing the development of some important examples, we explore how and why the materials were initially synthesized and how their utility was subsequently recognised. Three common pathways to materials breakthroughs are identified. In a small number of cases, such as the aluminosilicate zeolite catalyst ZSM-5, an important advance is made by using design principles based upon earlier work. There are also rare cases of breakthroughs that are serendipitous, such as the buckyball and Teflon(R). Most commonly, however, the breakthrough repurposes a compound that is already known and was often made out of curiosity or for a different application. Typically, the synthetic discovery precedes the discovery of functionality by many decades; key examples include conducting polymers, topological insulators and electrodes for lithium-ion batteries.Comment: 15 pages, two figure

    Design, Synthesis and Characterization of New Superconductors

    Get PDF
    Design and synthesis of new materials are a long-standing goal for chemistry, physics and material science, especially those with intriguing properties such as magnetism and superconductivity. With consideration and incorporation of the highlights in some existing design rules, we successfully designed and discovered the superconductivity in BaPt2Bi2, SrSnP and YbxPt5P. With the help of valence electron counting method, we synthesized a new intermetallic compound, BaIr2Ge2, which was then found to be non-superconducting above 1.8 K. Thus, we considered both valence electron counting and chemical pressure adjustment to reach the superconductivity of BaPt2Bi2 (Tc = 2.0 K) which crystallizes in a structure highly related to the parent compound of one of the high-temperature superconductors, BaFe2As2. According to the bonding analysis, Pt-Pt and Pt-Bi antibonding interactions are believed to be responsible to superconductivity in such system. In order to find more superconductors with Pt-Bi critical charge transfer pair, with the help from adaptive genetic algorithm, we synthesized SrPtBi2 for the first time. Theoretical calculation reveals that Pt-Bi antibonding interaction exists in SrPtBi2 but does not induce superconductivity while few Pt-Pt interaction can be found. Guided by the famous bismuthate superconductor, Ba1-xKxBiO3, we successfully observed the superconductivity in a known compound, SrSnP, at Tc = 2.3 K. The bonding analysis indicates that the Sn-P antibonding interaction and Sr-P bonding interaction are essential in releasing more electrons from Sn atom and, thus, provide more possibilities for electrons to form Cooper pair which is significant for superconductivity based on BCS theory. Due to the fact that there exist many superconducting Pt-rich materials, the ones with Pt-P charge transfer pair were also tested with the success in synthesizing APt8P2 (A = Ca and La) and YbxPt5P. APt8P2 compounds were determined to be non-superconducting above 1.8 K. The bonding analyses for them provided the evidence for structural stability. However, YbxPt5P was observed to be superconducting below Tc = 0.6 K while large heat capacity anomaly attributed to magnetism can be found below Tc which implies the possible coexistence of superconductivity and magnetism

    ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ํผํ…์…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ณผ ๊ทธ ์‘์šฉ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ํ•œ์Šน์šฐ.๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์กฐ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์›๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ด์ „์— ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋“ค์˜ ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฐ๊ด‘์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํšจ์œจ์ด ๋Š๋ฆฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‚ผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๊ณ„ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฌ๋‹ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์— ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ํผํ…์…œ์„ ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋“ค์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ํผํ…์…œ์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์–ด๋ ค์šด๋ฐ, ๊ทธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์–ด๋–ค ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜์˜ฌ์ง€ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด์™”๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ๋“ค์€ ์‚ผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๊ณ„ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์ ์šฉ๋  ๋งŒํผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํผํ…์…œ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž๋™์—ญํ•™ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋งŒ๋“  ๋น„์ •์งˆ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋“ค์„ ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํผํ…์…œ์˜ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ•™์Šต๋œ ํผํ…์…œ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์™€ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํผํ…์…œ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ธ SPINNER๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์™€ ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์•ˆ์— ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๊ณ„์˜ ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฌผ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋ฆฌํŠฌ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ „ํ•ด์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒ์ƒ‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์™€ ๋ฐœ์ „ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ˆ์ธก ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Crystal structure prediction aims to find the ground-state structure in a given composition. This is of great interest as it can establish a list of all synthesizable materials prior to experiments. However, the main challenge in predicting crystal structure comes from the efficiency of the algorithm: the NP-hardness of the problem and the high cost of density functional theory, which is employed as a structure optimizer and an energy evaluator, limit the widespread use of the algorithm in searching complex multinary systems. To accelerate the speed of crystal structure prediction, there have been several attempts to employ machine learning potentials as a surrogate model of density functional theory calculations. However, constructing the training set is not straightforward because prior knowledge of the configurations is not available before making predictions. Previous researches employed random sampling and on-the-fly sampling methods to train machine learning potentials but did not achieve enough efficiency and accuracy to be utilized in multinary systems. In this dissertation, we develop the crystal structure prediction program using neural network potentials as the surrogate model of density functional theory calculations. Our main idea is to construct the training set with the disordered structures sampled from molecular dynamics simulations. The energies calculated by trained potentials show a good correlation with the energies calculated by density functional theory calculations, which indicates that the neural network potential can be a hi-fidelity surrogate model for crystal structure prediction. Then, we develop the crystal structure prediction method by optimizing algorithms for constructing training sets, training neural network potentials, and searching structures with evolutionary algorithms. The developed program is tested on the experimental database and theoretical structures predicted by other crystal structure prediction methods. The tests show that the developed method can identify the global minimum in most cases at a reasonable computational cost. Using the developed method, we are now discovering the missing ternary metal oxides and Li superionic conducting oxide materials. By harnessing the accuracy and efficiency of neural network potentials, this dissertation will pave the way to the wide material discoveries in various research fields.Abstract Contents List of Tables List of Figures 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview of crystal structure prediction (CSP) 1.2 Goal of the dissertation 1.3 Organization of the dissertation 2 Theoretical background 2.1 Density functional theory 2.1.1 Born-Oppenheimer approximation 2.1.2 Hohenberg-Kohn theorem 2.1.3 Kohn-Sham equation 2.1.4 Exchange-correlation functional 2.2 Neural network potential (NNP) 2.2.1 Model 2.2.2 Descriptor 2.2.3 Training of NNP 2.3 Crystal structure prediction 2.3.1 Data-mining approaches 2.3.2 Heuristic approaches 2.3.3 Local optimization and energy evaluation 2.3.4 Structure similarity 2.3.5 Advanced techniques on genetic algorithm 3 CSP with machine learning potential 3.1 Training machine learning potential 3.1.1 Melt-quench-annealing simulation 3.1.2 Training NNP 3.1.3 Evaluation of the quality of NNP 3.1.4 Structure searching with NNP 3.2 Developing and optimizing CSP algorithm 3.2.1 Optimization of training procedure 3.2.2 Optimization of global optimization 3.3 Performance test 3.3.1 Blind tests on experimental database 3.3.2 Benchmark test on other CSP methods 3.3.3 Computational cost 3.4 Transfer learning over compositions 4 Applications of CSP 4.1 Synthesizability of missing ternary oxides 4.2 Li superionic solid electrolyte 4.3 Challenges and perspectives 5 Conclusion Bibliography 103 Abstract (In Korean) 108 Acknowlegement 110๋ฐ•
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore