294,289 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Machine Learning Decision Tree Models for Differentiation of Posterior Fossa Tumors Using Diffusion Histogram Analysis and Structural MRI Findings.
We applied machine learning algorithms for differentiation of posterior fossa tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis and structural MRI findings. A total of 256 patients with intra-axial posterior fossa tumors were identified, of whom 248 were included in machine learning analysis, with at least 6 representative subjects per each tumor pathology. The ADC histograms of solid components of tumors, structural MRI findings, and patients' age were applied to construct decision models using Classification and Regression Tree analysis. We also compared different machine learning classification algorithms (i.e., naïve Bayes, random forest, neural networks, support vector machine with linear and polynomial kernel) for dichotomized differentiation of the 5 most common tumors in our cohort: metastasis (n = 65), hemangioblastoma (n = 44), pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 43), ependymoma (n = 27), and medulloblastoma (n = 26). The decision tree model could differentiate seven tumor histopathologies with terminal nodes yielding up to 90% accurate classification rates. In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the decision tree model achieved greater area under the curve (AUC) for differentiation of pilocytic astrocytoma (p = 0.020); and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor ATRT (p = 0.001) from other types of neoplasms compared to the official clinical report. However, neuroradiologists' interpretations had greater accuracy in differentiating metastases (p = 0.001). Among different machine learning algorithms, random forest models yielded the highest accuracy in dichotomized classification of the 5 most common tumor types; and in multiclass differentiation of all tumor types random forest yielded an averaged AUC of 0.961 in training datasets, and 0.873 in validation samples. Our study demonstrates the potential application of machine learning algorithms and decision trees for accurate differentiation of brain tumors based on pretreatment MRI. Using easy to apply and understandable imaging metrics, the proposed decision tree model can help radiologists with differentiation of posterior fossa tumors, especially in tumors with similar qualitative imaging characteristics. In particular, our decision tree model provided more accurate differentiation of pilocytic astrocytomas from ATRT than by neuroradiologists in clinical reads
A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological examination in the diagnostic distinction of Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
The clinical distinction between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) remains challenging and largely dependent on the experience of the clinician. This study investigates whether objective machine learning algorithms using supportive neuroimaging and neuropsychological clinical features can aid the distinction between both diseases. Retrospective neuroimaging and neuropsychological data of 166 participants (54 AD; 55 bvFTD; 57 healthy controls) was analyzed via a Naïve Bayes classification model. A subgroup of patients (n = 22) had pathologically-confirmed diagnoses. Results show that a combination of gray matter atrophy and neuropsychological features allowed a correct classification of 61.47% of cases at clinical presentation. More importantly, there was a clear dissociation between imaging and neuropsychological features, with the latter having the greater diagnostic accuracy (respectively 51.38 vs. 62.39%). These findings indicate that, at presentation, machine learning classification of bvFTD and AD is mostly based on cognitive and not imaging features. This clearly highlights the urgent need to develop better biomarkers for both diseases, but also emphasizes the value of machine learning in determining the predictive diagnostic features in neurodegeneration
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
This paper introduces the Multi-Genre Natural Language Inference (MultiNLI)
corpus, a dataset designed for use in the development and evaluation of machine
learning models for sentence understanding. In addition to being one of the
largest corpora available for the task of NLI, at 433k examples, this corpus
improves upon available resources in its coverage: it offers data from ten
distinct genres of written and spoken English--making it possible to evaluate
systems on nearly the full complexity of the language--and it offers an
explicit setting for the evaluation of cross-genre domain adaptation.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figures, 5 tables. v2 corrects a misreported accuracy
number for the CBOW model in the 'matched' setting. v3 adds a discussion of
the difficulty of the corpus to the analysis section. v4 is the version that
was accepted to NAACL201
Beyond Volume: The Impact of Complex Healthcare Data on the Machine Learning Pipeline
From medical charts to national census, healthcare has traditionally operated
under a paper-based paradigm. However, the past decade has marked a long and
arduous transformation bringing healthcare into the digital age. Ranging from
electronic health records, to digitized imaging and laboratory reports, to
public health datasets, today, healthcare now generates an incredible amount of
digital information. Such a wealth of data presents an exciting opportunity for
integrated machine learning solutions to address problems across multiple
facets of healthcare practice and administration. Unfortunately, the ability to
derive accurate and informative insights requires more than the ability to
execute machine learning models. Rather, a deeper understanding of the data on
which the models are run is imperative for their success. While a significant
effort has been undertaken to develop models able to process the volume of data
obtained during the analysis of millions of digitalized patient records, it is
important to remember that volume represents only one aspect of the data. In
fact, drawing on data from an increasingly diverse set of sources, healthcare
data presents an incredibly complex set of attributes that must be accounted
for throughout the machine learning pipeline. This chapter focuses on
highlighting such challenges, and is broken down into three distinct
components, each representing a phase of the pipeline. We begin with attributes
of the data accounted for during preprocessing, then move to considerations
during model building, and end with challenges to the interpretation of model
output. For each component, we present a discussion around data as it relates
to the healthcare domain and offer insight into the challenges each may impose
on the efficiency of machine learning techniques.Comment: Healthcare Informatics, Machine Learning, Knowledge Discovery: 20
Pages, 1 Figur
Rapid Diagnostic Algorithms as a Screening Tool for Tuberculosis: An Assessor Blinded Cross-Sectional Study
Background: A major obstacle to effectively treat and control tuberculosis is the absence of an accurate, rapid, and low-cost diagnostic tool. A new approach for the screening of patients for tuberculosis is the use of rapid diagnostic classification algorithms.
Methods: We tested a previously published diagnostic algorithm based on four biomarkers as a screening tool for
tuberculosis in a Central European patient population using an assessor-blinded cross-sectional study design. In addition, we developed an improved diagnostic classification algorithm based on a study population at a tertiary hospital in Vienna, Austria, by supervised computational statistics.
Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the previously published diagnostic algorithm for our patient population consisting of 206 patients was 54% (CI: 47%–61%). An improved model was constructed using inflammation parameters and clinical information. A diagnostic accuracy of 86% (CI: 80%–90%) was demonstrated by 10-fold cross validation. An alternative model relying solely on clinical parameters exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 85% (CI: 79%–89%).
Conclusion: Here we show that a rapid diagnostic algorithm based on clinical parameters is only slightly improved by
inclusion of inflammation markers in our cohort. Our results also emphasize the need for validation of new diagnostic algorithms in different settings and patient populations
- …