2,764 research outputs found

    Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on dixon and ZTE MR images

    Full text link
    Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging modality widely used in neuroscience studies. To obtain meaningful quantitative results from PET images, attenuation correction is necessary during image reconstruction. For PET/MR hybrid systems, PET attenuation is challenging as Magnetic Resonance (MR) images do not reflect attenuation coefficients directly. To address this issue, we present deep neural network methods to derive the continuous attenuation coefficients for brain PET imaging from MR images. With only Dixon MR images as the network input, the existing U-net structure was adopted and analysis using forty patient data sets shows it is superior than other Dixon based methods. When both Dixon and zero echo time (ZTE) images are available, we have proposed a modified U-net structure, named GroupU-net, to efficiently make use of both Dixon and ZTE information through group convolution modules when the network goes deeper. Quantitative analysis based on fourteen real patient data sets demonstrates that both network approaches can perform better than the standard methods, and the proposed network structure can further reduce the PET quantification error compared to the U-net structure.Comment: 15 pages, 12 figure

    PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques

    Get PDF
    Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) potentially offers several advantages over positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), for example, no CT radiation dose and soft tissue images from MR acquired at the same time as the PET. However, obtaining accurate linear attenuation correction (LAC) factors for the lung remains difficult in PET/MRI. LACs depend on electron density and in the lung, these vary significantly both within an individual and from person to person. Current commercial practice is to use a single-valued population-based lung LAC, and better estimation is needed to improve quantification. Given the under-appreciation of lung attenuation estimation as an issue, the inaccuracy of PET quantification due to the use of single-valued lung LACs, the unique challenges of lung estimation, and the emerging status of PET/MRI scanners in lung disease, a review is timely. This paper highlights past and present methods, categorizing them into segmentation, atlas/mapping, and emission-based schemes. Potential strategies for future developments are also presented

    Multitracer Guided PET Image Reconstruction

    Get PDF

    ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์œ ๋„ PET ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ: ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฝ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์ ‘๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์ด์žฌ์„ฑ.Advances in simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) technology have led to an active investigation of the anatomy-guided regularized PET image reconstruction algorithm based on MR images. Among the various priors proposed for anatomy-guided regularized PET image reconstruction, Bowsherโ€™s method based on second-order smoothing priors sometimes suffers from over-smoothing of detailed structures. Therefore, in this study, we propose a Bowsher prior based on the l1 norm and an iteratively reweighting scheme to overcome the limitation of the original Bowsher method. In addition, we have derived a closed solution for iterative image reconstruction based on this non-smooth prior. A comparison study between the original l2 and proposed l1 Bowsher priors were conducted using computer simulation and real human data. In the simulation and real data application, small lesions with abnormal PET uptake were better detected by the proposed l1 Bowsher prior methods than the original Bowsher prior. The original l2 Bowsher leads to a decreased PET intensity in small lesions when there is no clear separation between the lesions and surrounding tissue in the anatomical prior. However, the proposed l1 Bowsher prior methods showed better contrast between the tumors and surrounding tissues owing to the intrinsic edge-preserving property of the prior which is attributed to the sparseness induced by l1 norm, especially in the iterative reweighting scheme. Besides, the proposed methods demonstrated lower bias and less hyper-parameter dependency on PET intensity estimation in the regions with matched anatomical boundaries in PET and MRI. Moreover, based on the formulation of l1 Bowsher prior, the unrolled network containing the conventional maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (ML-EM) module was also proposed. The convolutional layers successfully learned the distribution of anatomically-guided PET images and the EM module corrected the intermediate outputs by comparing them with sinograms. The proposed unrolled network showed better performance than ordinary U-Net, where the regional uptake is less biased and deviated. Therefore, these methods will help improve the PET image quality based on the anatomical side information.์–‘์ „์ž๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜ / ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช…์˜์ƒ (PET/MRI) ๋™์‹œ ํš๋“ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ MR ์˜์ƒ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋œ PET ์˜์ƒ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๋„์žˆ๋Š” ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋œ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ค‘ 2์ฐจ ํ‰ํ™œํ™” ์‚ฌ์ „ํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ Bowsher์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ํ‰ํ™œํ™”๋กœ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฒช๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›๋ž˜ Bowsher ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด l1 norm์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์ธ ์žฌ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฝ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ซํžŒ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜ l2์™€ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ PET ํก์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ž‘์€ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์€ ์›๋ž˜ Bowsher ์ด์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋” ์ž˜ ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜์˜ l2 Bowsher๋Š” ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์กฐ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์—†์„ ๋•Œ ์ž‘์€ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์—์„œ์˜ PET ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์  ์žฌ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์—์„œ l1 ๋…ธ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋œ ํฌ์†Œ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ข…์–‘๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์กฐ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๋Œ€๋น„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ PET๊ณผ MRI์˜ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ PET ๊ฐ•๋„ ์ถ”์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŽธํ–ฅ์ด ๋” ๋‚ฎ๊ณ  ํ•˜์ดํผ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ข…์†์„ฑ์ด ์ ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, l1Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋‹ซํžŒ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ML-EM (maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization) ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ํŽผ์ณ์ง„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋„ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ปจ๋ณผ๋ฃจ์…˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด๋Š” ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•™์Šตํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, EM ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์ถœ๋ ฅ๋“ค์„ ์‚ฌ์ด๋…ธ๊ทธ๋žจ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ๋“ค์–ด๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํŽผ์ณ์ง„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํก์ˆ˜์„ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋œ ํŽธํ–ฅ๋˜๊ณ  ํŽธ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ ์–ด, ์ผ๋ฐ˜ U-Net๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Backgrounds 1 1.1.1. Positron Emission Tomography 1 1.1.2. Maximum a Posterior Reconstruction 1 1.1.3. Anatomical Prior 2 1.1.4. Proposed l_1 Bowsher Prior 3 1.1.5. Deep Learning for MR-less Application 4 1.2. Purpose of the Research 4 Chapter 2. Anatomically-guided PET Reconstruction Using Bowsher Prior 6 2.1. Backgrounds 6 2.1.1. PET Data Model 6 2.1.2. Original Bowsher Prior 7 2.2. Methods and Materials 8 2.2.1. Proposed l_1 Bowsher Prior 8 2.2.2. Iterative Reweighting 13 2.2.3. Computer Simulations 15 2.2.4. Human Data 16 2.2.5. Image Analysis 17 2.3. Results 19 2.3.1. Simulation with Brain Phantom 19 2.3.2.Human Data 20 2.4. Discussions 25 Chapter 3. Deep Learning Approach for Anatomically-guided PET Reconstruction 31 3.1. Backgrounds 31 3.2. Methods and Materials 33 3.2.1. Douglas-Rachford Splitting 33 3.2.2. Network Architecture 34 3.2.3. Dataset and Training Details 35 3.2.4. Image Analysis 36 3.3. Results 37 3.4. Discussions 38 Chapter 4. Conclusions 40 Bibliography 41 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก) 52Docto

    MR-based attenuation correction and scatter correction in neurological PET/MR imaging with 18F-FDG

    Get PDF
    The aim was to investigate the effects of MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) and scatter correction to positron emission tomography (PET) image quantification in neurological PET/MR with 18F-FDG. A multi-center phantom study was conducted to investigate the effect of MRAC between PET/MR and PET/CT systems (I). An MRAC method to derive bone from T1-weighted MR images was developed (II, III). Finally, scatter correction accuracy with MRAC was investigated (IV). The results show that the quantitative accuracy in PET is well-comparable be-tween PET/MR and PET/CT systems when an attenuation correction method resembling CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) is implemented. This al-lows achieving of a PET bias within standard uptake value (SUV) quantification repeatability (< 10 % error) and is within the repeatability of PET in most sys-tems and brain regions (< 5 % error). In addition, MRAC considering soft tissue, air and bone can be derived using T1-weighted images alone. The improved version of the MRAC method allows achieving a quantitative accuracy feasible for advanced applications (< 5 % error). MRAC has a minor effect on the scatter correction accuracy (< 3 % error), even when using MRAC without bone. In conclusion, MRAC can be considered the largest contributing factor to PET quantification bias in 18F-FDG neurological PET/MR. This finding is not explicitly limited only to 18F-FDG imaging. Once an MRAC method that performs close to CTAC is implemented, there is no reason why a PET/MR system would perform differently from a PET/CT system. Such an MRAC method has been developed and is freely available (http://bit.ly/2fx6Jjz). Scatter correction can be considered a non-issue in neurological PET/MR imaging when using 18F-FD
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore