Integrating speculation detection and deep learning to extract lung cancer diagnosis from clinical notes

Despite efforts to develop models for extracting medical concepts from clinical notes, there are still some challenges in particular to be able to relate concepts to dates. The high number of clinical notes written for each single patient, the use of negation, speculation, and different date formats cause ambiguity that has to be solved to reconstruct the patient’s natural history. In this paper, we concentrate on extracting from clinical narratives the cancer diagnosis and relating it to the diagnosis date. To address this challenge, a hybrid approach that combines deep learning-based and rule-based methods is proposed. The approach integrates three steps: (i) lung cancer named entity recognition, (ii) negation and speculation detection, and (iii) relating the cancer diagnosis to a valid date. In particular, we apply the proposed approach to extract the lung cancer diagnosis and its diagnosis date from clinical narratives written in Spanish. Results obtained show an F-score of 90% in the named entity recognition task, and a 89% F-score in the task of relating the cancer diagnosis to the diagnosis date. Our findings suggest that speculation detection is together with negation detection a key component to properly extract cancer diagnosis from clinical notesThis work is supported by the EU Horizon 2020 innovation program under grant agreement No. 780495, project BigMedilytics (Big Data for Medical Analytics). It has been also supported by Fundación AECC and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant AC19/00034), under the frame of ERA-NET PerMe

Clinical narrative analytics challenges

Precision medicine or evidence based medicine is based on the extraction of knowledge from medical records to provide individuals with the appropriate treatment in the appropriate moment according to the patient features. Despite the efforts of using clinical narratives for clinical decision support, many challenges have to be faced still today such as multilinguarity, diversity of terms and formats in different services, acronyms, negation, to name but a few. The same problems exist when one wants to analyze narratives in literature whose analysis would provide physicians and researchers with highlights. In this talk we will analyze challenges, solutions and open problems and will analyze several frameworks and tools that are able to perform NLP over free text to extract medical entities by means of Named Entity Recognition process. We will also analyze a framework we have developed to extract and validate medical terms. In particular we present two uses cases: (i) medical entities extraction of a set of infectious diseases description texts provided by MedlinePlus and (ii) scales of stroke identification in clinical narratives written in Spanish

Quantitative analysis of manual annotation of clinical text samples

International audienceBackground: Semantic interoperability of eHealth services within and across countries has been the main topic in several research projects. It is a key consideration for the European Commission to overcome the complexity of making different health information systems work together. This paper describes a study within the EU-funded project ASSESS CT, which focuses on assessing the potential of SNOMED CT as core reference terminology for semantic interoperability at European level.Objective: This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the results obtained in ASSESS CT to determine the fitness of SNOMED CT for semantic interoperability.Methods: The quantitative analysis consists of concept coverage, term coverage and inter-annotator agreement analysis of the annotation experiments related to six European languages (English, Swedish, French, Dutch, German and Finnish) and three scenarios: (i) ADOPT, where only SNOMED CT was used by the annotators; (ii) ALTERNATIVE, where a fixed set of terminologies from UMLS, excluding SNOMED CT, was used; and (iii) ABSTAIN, where any terminologies available in the current national infrastructure of the annotators' country were used. For each language and each scenario, we configured the different terminology settings of the annotation experiments.Results: There was a positive correlation between the number of concepts in each terminology setting and their concept and term coverage values. Inter-annotator agreement is low, irrespective of the terminology setting.Conclusions: No significant differences were found between the analyses for the three scenarios, but availability of SNOMED CT for the assessed language is associated with increased concept coverage. Terminology setting size and concept and term coverage correlate positively up to a limit where more concepts do not significantly impact the coverage values. The results did not confirm the hypothesis of an inverse correlation between concept coverage and IAA due to a lower amount of choices available. The overall low IAA results pose a challenge for interoperability and indicate the need for further research to assess whether consistent terminology implementation is possible across Europe, e.g., improving term coverage by adding localized versions of the selected terminologies, analysing causes of low inter-annotator agreement, and improving tooling and guidance for annotators. The much lower term coverage for the Swedish version of SNOMED CT compared to English together with the similarly high concept coverage obtained with English and Swedish SNOMED CT reflects its relevance as a hub to connect user interface terminologies and serving a variety of user needs

A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports

NLP has a significant role in advancing healthcare and has been found to be key in extracting structured information from radiology reports. Understanding recent developments in NLP application to radiology is of significance but recent reviews on this are limited. This study systematically assesses recent literature in NLP applied to radiology reports. Our automated literature search yields 4,799 results using automated filtering, metadata enriching steps and citation search combined with manual review. Our analysis is based on 21 variables including radiology characteristics, NLP methodology, performance, study, and clinical application characteristics. We present a comprehensive analysis of the 164 publications retrieved with each categorised into one of 6 clinical application categories. Deep learning use increases but conventional machine learning approaches are still prevalent. Deep learning remains challenged when data is scarce and there is little evidence of adoption into clinical practice. Despite 17% of studies reporting greater than 0.85 F1 scores, it is hard to comparatively evaluate these approaches given that most of them use different datasets. Only 14 studies made their data and 15 their code available with 10 externally validating results. Automated understanding of clinical narratives of the radiology reports has the potential to enhance the healthcare process but reproducibility and explainability of models are important if the domain is to move applications into clinical use. More could be done to share code enabling validation of methods on different institutional data and to reduce heterogeneity in reporting of study properties allowing inter-study comparisons. Our results have significance for researchers providing a systematic synthesis of existing work to build on, identify gaps, opportunities for collaboration and avoid duplication

Language modelling for clinical natural language understanding and generation

One of the long-standing objectives of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is to design and develop algorithms for social good including tackling public health challenges. In the era of digitisation, with an unprecedented amount of healthcare data being captured in digital form, the analysis of the healthcare data at scale can lead to better research of diseases, better monitoring patient conditions and more importantly improving patient outcomes. However, many AI-based analytic algorithms rely solely on structured healthcare data such as bedside measurements and test results which only account for 20% of all healthcare data, whereas the remaining 80% of healthcare data is unstructured including textual data such as clinical notes and discharge summaries which is still underexplored. Conventional Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms that are designed for clinical applications rely on the shallow matching, templates and non-contextualised word embeddings which lead to limited understanding of contextual semantics. Though recent advances in NLP algorithms have demonstrated promising performance on a variety of NLP tasks in the general domain with contextualised language models, most of these generic NLP algorithms struggle at specific clinical NLP tasks which require biomedical knowledge and reasoning. Besides, there is limited research to study generative NLP algorithms to generate clinical reports and summaries automatically by considering salient clinical information. This thesis aims to design and develop novel NLP algorithms especially clinical-driven contextualised language models to understand textual healthcare data and generate clinical narratives which can potentially support clinicians, medical scientists and patients. The first contribution of this thesis focuses on capturing phenotypic information of patients from clinical notes which is important to profile patient situation and improve patient outcomes. The thesis proposes a novel self-supervised language model, named Phenotypic Intelligence Extraction (PIE), to annotate phenotypes from clinical notes with the detection of contextual synonyms and the enhancement to reason with numerical values. The second contribution is to demonstrate the utility and benefits of using phenotypic features of patients in clinical use cases by predicting patient outcomes in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and identifying patients at risk of specific diseases with better accuracy and model interpretability. The third contribution is to propose generative models to generate clinical narratives to automate and accelerate the process of report writing and summarisation by clinicians. This thesis first proposes a novel summarisation language model named PEGASUS which surpasses or is on par with the state-of-the-art performance on 12 downstream datasets including biomedical literature from PubMed. PEGASUS is further extended to generate medical scientific documents from input tabular data.Open Acces

Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review

Objectives A substantial portion of the data contained in Electronic Health Records (EHR) is unstructured, often appearing as free text. This format restricts its potential utility in clinical decision-making. Named entity recognition (NER) methods address the challenge of extracting pertinent information from unstructured text. The aim of this study was to outline the current NER methods and trace their evolution from 2011 to 2022. Methods We conducted a methodological literature review of NER methods, with a focus on distinguishing the classification models, the types of tagging systems, and the languages employed in various corpora. Results Several methods have been documented for automatically extracting relevant information from EHRs using natural language processing techniques such as NER and relation extraction (RE). These methods can automatically extract concepts, events, attributes, and other data, as well as the relationships between them. Most NER studies conducted thus far have utilized corpora in English or Chinese. Additionally, the bidirectional encoder representation from transformers using the BIO tagging system architecture is the most frequently reported classification scheme. We discovered a limited number of papers on the implementation of NER or RE tasks in EHRs within a specific clinical domain. Conclusions EHRs play a pivotal role in gathering clinical information and could serve as the primary source for automated clinical decision support systems. However, the creation of new corpora from EHRs in specific clinical domains is essential to facilitate the swift development of NER and RE models applied to EHRs for use in clinical practice

The impact of pretrained language models on negation and speculation detection in cross-lingual medical text: Comparative study

Background: Negation and speculation are critical elements in natural language processing (NLP)-related tasks, such as information extraction, as these phenomena change the truth value of a proposition. In the clinical narrative that is informal, these linguistic facts are used extensively with the objective of indicating hypotheses, impressions, or negative findings. Previous state-of-the-art approaches addressed negation and speculation detection tasks using rule-based methods, but in the last few years, models based on machine learning and deep learning exploiting morphological, syntactic, and semantic features represented as spare and dense vectors have emerged. However, although such methods of named entity recognition (NER) employ a broad set of features, they are limited to existing pretrained models for a specific domain or language. Objective: As a fundamental subsystem of any information extraction pipeline, a system for cross-lingual and domain-independent negation and speculation detection was introduced with special focus on the biomedical scientific literature and clinical narrative. In this work, detection of negation and speculation was considered as a sequence-labeling task where cues and the scopes of both phenomena are recognized as a sequence of nested labels recognized in a single step. Methods: We proposed the following two approaches for negation and speculation detection: (1) bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) and conditional random field using character, word, and sense embeddings to deal with the extraction of semantic, syntactic, and contextual patterns and (2) bidirectional encoder representations for transformers (BERT) with fine tuning for NER. Results: The approach was evaluated for English and Spanish languages on biomedical and review text, particularly with the BioScope corpus, IULA corpus, and SFU Spanish Review corpus, with F-measures of 86.6%, 85.0%, and 88.1%, respectively, for NeuroNER and 86.4%, 80.8%, and 91.7%, respectively, for BERT. Conclusions: These results show that these architectures perform considerably better than the previous rule-based and conventional machine learning-based systems. Moreover, our analysis results show that pretrained word embedding and particularly contextualized embedding for biomedical corpora help to understand complexities inherent to biomedical text.This work was supported by the Research Program of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Government of Spain (DeepEMR Project TIN2017-87548-C2-1-R)