Classification of OBDD Size for Monotone 2-CNFs

We introduce a new graph parameter called linear upper maximum induced matching width lu-mim width, denoted for a graph G by lu(G). We prove that the smallest size of the obdd for ?, the monotone 2-cnf corresponding to G, is sandwiched between 2^{lu(G)} and n^{O(lu(G))}. The upper bound is based on a combinatorial statement that might be of an independent interest. We show that the bounds in terms of this parameter are best possible. The new parameter is closely related to two existing parameters: linear maximum induced matching width (lmim width) and linear special induced matching width (lsim width). We prove that lu-mim width lies strictly in between these two parameters, being dominated by lsim width and dominating lmim width. We conclude that neither of the two existing parameters can be used instead of lu-mim width to characterize the size of obdds for monotone 2-cnfs and this justifies introduction of the new parameter

On OBDD-Based Algorithms and Proof Systems That Dynamically Change Order of Variables

In 2004 Atserias, Kolaitis and Vardi proposed OBDD-based propositional proof systems that prove unsatisfiability of a CNF formula by deduction of identically false OBDD from OBDDs representing clauses of the initial formula. All OBDDs in such proofs have the same order of variables. We initiate the study of OBDD based proof systems that additionally contain a rule that allows to change the order in OBDDs. At first we consider a proof system OBDD(and, reordering) that uses the conjunction (join) rule and the rule that allows to change the order. We exponentially separate this proof system from OBDD(and)-proof system that uses only the conjunction rule. We prove two exponential lower bounds on the size of OBDD(and, reordering)-refutations of Tseitin formulas and the pigeonhole principle. The first lower bound was previously unknown even for OBDD(and)-proofs and the second one extends the result of Tveretina et al. from OBDD(and) to OBDD(and, reordering). In 2004 Pan and Vardi proposed an approach to the propositional satisfiability problem based on OBDDs and symbolic quantifier elimination (we denote algorithms based on this approach as OBDD(and, exists)-algorithms. We notice that there exists an OBDD(and, exists)-algorithm that solves satisfiable and unsatisfiable Tseitin formulas in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that there exist formulas representing systems of linear equations over F_2 that are hard for OBDD(and, exists, reordering)-algorithms. Our hard instances are satisfiable formulas representing systems of linear equations over F_2 that correspond to some checksum matrices of error correcting codes

Towards Verifying Nonlinear Integer Arithmetic

We eliminate a key roadblock to efficient verification of nonlinear integer arithmetic using CDCL SAT solvers, by showing how to construct short resolution proofs for many properties of the most widely used multiplier circuits. Such short proofs were conjectured not to exist. More precisely, we give n^{O(1)} size regular resolution proofs for arbitrary degree 2 identities on array, diagonal, and Booth multipliers and quasipolynomial- n^{O(\log n)} size proofs for these identities on Wallace tree multipliers.Comment: Expanded and simplified with improved result

Resolution and binary decision diagrams cannot simulate each other polynomially

There are many different ways of proving formulas in proposition logic. Many of these can easily be characterized as forms of resolution. Others use so-called binary decision diagrams (BDDs). Experimental evidence suggests that BDDs and resolution based techniques are fundamentally different, in the sense that their performance can differ very much on benchmarks. In this paper we confirm these findings by mathematical proof. We provide examples that are easy for BDDS and exponentially hard for any form of resolution, and vice versa, examples that ar easy for resolution and exponentially hard for BDDs

Artificial evolution with Binary Decision Diagrams: a study in evolvability in neutral spaces

This thesis develops a new approach to evolving Binary Decision Diagrams, and uses it to study evolvability issues. For reasons that are not yet fully understood, current approaches to artificial evolution fail to exhibit the evolvability so readily exhibited in nature. To be able to apply evolvability to artificial evolution the field must first understand and characterise it; this will then lead to systems which are much more capable than they are currently. An experimental approach is taken. Carefully crafted, controlled experiments elucidate the mechanisms and properties that facilitate evolvability, focusing on the roles and interplay between neutrality, modularity, gradualism, robustness and diversity. Evolvability is found to emerge under gradual evolution as a biased distribution of functionality within the genotype-phenotype map, which serves to direct phenotypic variation. Neutrality facilitates fitness-conserving exploration, completely alleviating local optima. Population diversity, in conjunction with neutrality, is shown to facilitate the evolution of evolvability. The search is robust, scalable, and insensitive to the absence of initial diversity. The thesis concludes that gradual evolution in a search space that is free of local optima by way of neutrality can be a viable alternative to problematic evolution on multi-modal landscapes

Restricted branching programs and hardware verification

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1995.Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-77).by Stephen John Ponzio.Ph.D

A Generalized Quantum Branching Program

Classical branching programs are studied to understand the space complexity of computational problems. Prior to this work, Nakanishi and Ablayev had separately defined two different quantum versions of branching programs that we refer to as NQBP and AQBP. However, none of them, to our satisfaction, captures the intuitive idea of being able to query different variables in superposition in one step of a branching program traversal. Here we propose a quantum branching program model, referred to as GQBP, with that ability. To motivate our definition, we explicitly give examples of GQBP for n-bit Deutsch-Jozsa, n-bit Parity, and 3-bit Majority with optimal lengths. We the show several equivalences, namely, between GQBP and AQBP, GQBP and NQBP, and GQBP and query complexities (using either oracle gates and a QRAM to query input bits). In way this unifies the different results that we have for the two earlier branching programs, and also connects them to query complexity. We hope that GQBP can be used to prove space and space-time lower bounds for quantum solutions to combinatorial problems.Comment: 21 page

On Lower Bounds for Parity Branching Programs

Diese Arbeit beschaeftigt sich mit der Komplexität von parity Branching Programmen. Es werden superpolynomiale untere Schranken für verschiedene Varianten bewiesen, nämlich für well-structured graph-driven parity branching programs, general graph-driven parity branching programs und Summen von graph-driven parity branching programs

Uniform Random Sampling of Traces in Very Large Models

This paper presents some first results on how to perform uniform random walks (where every trace has the same probability to occur) in very large models. The models considered here are described in a succinct way as a set of communicating reactive modules. The method relies upon techniques for counting and drawing uniformly at random words in regular languages. Each module is considered as an automaton defining such a language. It is shown how it is possible to combine local uniform drawings of traces, and to obtain some global uniform random sampling, without construction of the global model