Photovoltaic sample-and-hold circuit enabling MPPT indoors for low-power systems

Photovoltaic (PV) energy harvesting is commonly used to power autonomous devices, and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is often used to optimize its efficiency. This paper describes an ultra low-power MPPT circuit with a novel sample-and-hold and cold-start arrangement, enabling MPPT across the range of light intensities found indoors, which has not been reported before. The circuit has been validated in practice and found to cold-start and operate from 100 lux (typical of dim indoor lighting) up to 5000 lux with a 55cm2 amorphous silicon PV module. It is more efficient than non-MPPT circuits, which are the state-of-the-art for indoor PV systems. The proposed circuit maximizes the active time of the PV module by carrying out samples only once per minute. The MPPT control arrangement draws a quiescent current draw of only 8uA, and does not require an additional light sensor as has been required by previously-reported low-power MPPT circuits

Ultra low-power photovoltaic MPPT technique for indoor and outdoor wireless sensor nodes

Photovoltaic (PV) energy harvesting is commonly used to power wireless sensor nodes. To optimise harvesting efficiency, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques are often used. Recently-reported techniques focus solely on outdoor applications, being too power-hungry for use under indoor lighting. Additionally, some techniques have required light sensors (or pilot cells) to control their operating point. This paper describes an ultra low-power MPPT technique which is based on a novel system design and sample-and-hold arrangement, which enables MPPT across the range of light intensities found indoors and outdoors and is capable of cold-starting. The proposed sample-and-hold based technique has been validated through a prototype system. Its performance compares favourably against state-of-the-art systems, and does not require an additional pilot cell or photodiode. This represents an important contribution, in particular for sensors which may be exposed to different types of lighting (such as body-worn or mobile sensors)

Flexible and stretchable power sources for wearable electronics.

Flexible and stretchable power sources represent a key technology for the realization of wearable electronics. Developing flexible and stretchable batteries with mechanical endurance that is on par with commercial standards and offer compliance while retaining safety remains a significant challenge. We present a unique approach that demonstrates mechanically robust, intrinsically safe silver-zinc batteries. This approach uses current collectors with enhanced mechanical design, such as helical springs and serpentines, as a structural support and backbone for all battery components. We show wire-shaped batteries based on helical band springs that are resilient to fatigue and retain electrochemical performance over 17,000 flexure cycles at a 0.5-cm bending radius. Serpentine-shaped batteries can be stretched with tunable degree and directionality while maintaining their specific capacity. Finally, the batteries are integrated, as a wearable device, with a photovoltaic module that enables recharging of the batteries

Flexible Integration of Alternative Energy Sources for Autonomous Sensing

Recent developments in energy harvesting and autonomous sensing mean that it is now possible to power sensors solely from energy harvested from the environment. Clearly this is dependent on sufficient environmental energy being present. The range of feasible environments for operation can be extended by combining multiple energy sources on a sensor node. The effective monitoring of their energy resources is also important to deliver sustained and effective operation. This paper outlines the issues concerned with combining and managing multiple energy sources on sensor nodes. This problem is approached from both a hardware and embedded software viewpoint. A complete system is described in which energy is harvested from both light and vibration, stored in a common energy store, and interrogated and managed by the node

Design considerations of sub-mW indoor light energy harvesting for wireless sensor systems

For most wireless sensor networks, one common and major bottleneck is the limited battery lifetime. The frequent maintenance efforts associated with battery replacement significantly increase the system operational and logistics cost. Unnoticed power failures on nodes will degrade the system reliability and may lead to system failure. In building management applications, to solve this problem, small energy sources such as indoor light energy are promising to provide long-term power to these distributed wireless sensor nodes. This paper provides comprehensive design considerations for an indoor light energy harvesting system for building management applications. Photovoltaic cells characteristics, energy storage units, power management circuit design and power consumption pattern of the target mote are presented. Maximum power point tracking circuits are proposed which significantly increase the power obtained from the solar cells. The novel fast charge circuit reduces the charging time. A prototype was then successfully built and tested in various indoor light conditions to discover the practical issues of the design. The evaluation results show that the proposed prototype increases the power harvested from the PV cells by 30% and also accelerates the charging rate by 34% in a typical indoor lighting condition. By entirely eliminating the rechargeable battery as energy storage, the proposed system would expect an operational lifetime 10-20 years instead of the current less than 6 months battery lifetim

Which type of solar cell is best for low power indoor devices?

Low power devices such as sensors and wireless communication nodes, focused towards indoor applications, face serious challenges in terms of harvesting nearby natural sources of energy for power. Nowadays, these wireless systems use batteries as source of energy. These batteries need to be replaced in due time and this factor plays a major role in determining the life of the device. Often, the cost of replacing the battery outweighs the cost of the device itself. Also from an environmental perspective, reducing battery waste is laudable. In order to obtain an “infinite” lifetime of the system, the device should be able to harvest energy from renewable resources in the device’s environment. Photovoltaic (PV) energy is an efficient natural energy source for outdoor applications. However, for indoor applications, the efficiency of classical crystalline silicon PV cells is much lower. Typically, the light intensity under artificial lighting conditions found in offices and homes is less than 10 W/m² as compared to 100-1000 W/m² under outdoor conditions. Moreover, the spectrum is different from the outdoor solar spectrum. Although the crystalline Si cell is still dominating the PV market, second generation solar cells, i.e. thin film technologies, are rapidly entering the market. The different PV cells are rated by their power output under standard test conditions (AM1.5 global spectrum and light intensity of 1000 W/m²) but those conditions are not relevant for indoor applications. The question therefore arises: which type of solar cell is best for indoor devices? This paper contributes to answering that question by comparing the power output of different thin film solar cells (CdTe, CIGS, amorphous Si, GaAs and an organic cell with active layer P3HT:PCBM) with the classical crystalline silicon solar cell as reference. This comparison is made for typical artificial light sources, i.e. an LED lamp, a “warm” and a “cool” fluorescent tube and a common incandescent and halogen lamp, which are compared to the outdoor AM1.5 spectrum as reference. All light sources (including the outdoor spectrum) are scaled to an illumination of 500 lux to obtain a correct comparison. The best artificial light source for all cell types is the incandescent lamp which, for Si and CIGS, improves the performance of the cell with a factor of 3 compared with AM 1.5. The LED lamp is the worst light source for indoor PV with a decrease in performance of a quarter for amorphous silicon to two thirds for crystalline silicon cells. The best solar cells for indoor use depend heavily on the light source. For an incandescent lamp, crystalline silicon remains the best. However, for an LED lamp or “warm” fluorescent tube, amorphous silicon is significantly better. For “cold” fluorescent tubes as light sources, CdTe solar cells perform the best