11,099 research outputs found

    Efficient Semidefinite Branch-and-Cut for MAP-MRF Inference

    Full text link
    We propose a Branch-and-Cut (B&C) method for solving general MAP-MRF inference problems. The core of our method is a very efficient bounding procedure, which combines scalable semidefinite programming (SDP) and a cutting-plane method for seeking violated constraints. In order to further speed up the computation, several strategies have been exploited, including model reduction, warm start and removal of inactive constraints. We analyze the performance of the proposed method under different settings, and demonstrate that our method either outperforms or performs on par with state-of-the-art approaches. Especially when the connectivities are dense or when the relative magnitudes of the unary costs are low, we achieve the best reported results. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm achieves better approximation than the state-of-the-art methods within a variety of time budgets on challenging non-submodular MAP-MRF inference problems.Comment: 21 page

    Adapting the interior point method for the solution of LPs on serial, coarse grain parallel and massively parallel computers

    Get PDF
    In this paper we describe a unified scheme for implementing an interior point algorithm (IPM) over a range of computer architectures. In the inner iteration of the IPM a search direction is computed using Newton's method. Computationally this involves solving a sparse symmetric positive definite (SSPD) system of equations. The choice of direct and indirect methods for the solution of this system, and the design of data structures to take advantage of serial, coarse grain parallel and massively parallel computer architectures, are considered in detail. We put forward arguments as to why integration of the system within a sparse simplex solver is important and outline how the system is designed to achieve this integration

    Constrained Deep Networks: Lagrangian Optimization via Log-Barrier Extensions

    Full text link
    This study investigates the optimization aspects of imposing hard inequality constraints on the outputs of CNNs. In the context of deep networks, constraints are commonly handled with penalties for their simplicity, and despite their well-known limitations. Lagrangian-dual optimization has been largely avoided, except for a few recent works, mainly due to the computational complexity and stability/convergence issues caused by alternating explicit dual updates/projections and stochastic optimization. Several studies showed that, surprisingly for deep CNNs, the theoretical and practical advantages of Lagrangian optimization over penalties do not materialize in practice. We propose log-barrier extensions, which approximate Lagrangian optimization of constrained-CNN problems with a sequence of unconstrained losses. Unlike standard interior-point and log-barrier methods, our formulation does not need an initial feasible solution. Furthermore, we provide a new technical result, which shows that the proposed extensions yield an upper bound on the duality gap. This generalizes the duality-gap result of standard log-barriers, yielding sub-optimality certificates for feasible solutions. While sub-optimality is not guaranteed for non-convex problems, our result shows that log-barrier extensions are a principled way to approximate Lagrangian optimization for constrained CNNs via implicit dual variables. We report comprehensive weakly supervised segmentation experiments, with various constraints, showing that our formulation outperforms substantially the existing constrained-CNN methods, both in terms of accuracy, constraint satisfaction and training stability, more so when dealing with a large number of constraints
    corecore