3,014 research outputs found

    Inductive Logic Programming in Databases: from Datalog to DL+log

    Full text link
    In this paper we address an issue that has been brought to the attention of the database community with the advent of the Semantic Web, i.e. the issue of how ontologies (and semantics conveyed by them) can help solving typical database problems, through a better understanding of KR aspects related to databases. In particular, we investigate this issue from the ILP perspective by considering two database problems, (i) the definition of views and (ii) the definition of constraints, for a database whose schema is represented also by means of an ontology. Both can be reformulated as ILP problems and can benefit from the expressive and deductive power of the KR framework DL+log. We illustrate the application scenarios by means of examples. Keywords: Inductive Logic Programming, Relational Databases, Ontologies, Description Logics, Hybrid Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Systems. Note: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).Comment: 30 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables

    Relational Representations in Reinforcement Learning: Review and Open Problems

    Get PDF
    This paper is about representation in RL.We discuss some of the concepts in representation and generalization in reinforcement learning and argue for higher-order representations, instead of the commonly used propositional representations. The paper contains a small review of current reinforcement learning systems using higher-order representations, followed by a brief discussion. The paper ends with research directions and open problems.\u

    On the Implementation of the Probabilistic Logic Programming Language ProbLog

    Get PDF
    The past few years have seen a surge of interest in the field of probabilistic logic learning and statistical relational learning. In this endeavor, many probabilistic logics have been developed. ProbLog is a recent probabilistic extension of Prolog motivated by the mining of large biological networks. In ProbLog, facts can be labeled with probabilities. These facts are treated as mutually independent random variables that indicate whether these facts belong to a randomly sampled program. Different kinds of queries can be posed to ProbLog programs. We introduce algorithms that allow the efficient execution of these queries, discuss their implementation on top of the YAP-Prolog system, and evaluate their performance in the context of large networks of biological entities.Comment: 28 pages; To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP

    Automated Game Design Learning

    Full text link
    While general game playing is an active field of research, the learning of game design has tended to be either a secondary goal of such research or it has been solely the domain of humans. We propose a field of research, Automated Game Design Learning (AGDL), with the direct purpose of learning game designs directly through interaction with games in the mode that most people experience games: via play. We detail existing work that touches the edges of this field, describe current successful projects in AGDL and the theoretical foundations that enable them, point to promising applications enabled by AGDL, and discuss next steps for this exciting area of study. The key moves of AGDL are to use game programs as the ultimate source of truth about their own design, and to make these design properties available to other systems and avenues of inquiry.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for CIG 201

    Introduction to the TPLP special issue, logic programming in databases: From Datalog to semantic-web rules

    Get PDF
    Much has happened in data and knowledge base research since the introduction of the relational model in Codd (1970) and its strong logical foundations influence its advances ever since. Logic has been a common ground where Database and Artificial Intelligence research competed and collaborated with each other for a long time (Abiteboul et al. 1995). The product of this joint effort has been a set of logic-based formalisms, such as the Relational Calculus (Codd 1970), Datalog (Ceri et al. 1990), Description Logics (Baader et al. 2007), etc., capturing not only the structure but also the semantics of data in an explicit way, thus enabling complex inference procedures.This special issue contains three rigorously reviewed articles addressing problems that span from Query Answering to Data Mining. All these contributions have their roots in the foundational formalisms of Data and Knowledge Bases such as Logic Programming, Description Logic and Hybrid Logics, representing a clear example of the effort that the Database and the Semantic-Web communities are producing to bridge the various schools of thinking in modern Data and Knowledge Management

    10302 Abstracts Collection -- Learning paradigms in dynamic environments

    Get PDF
    From 25.07. to 30.07.2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10302 ``Learning paradigms in dynamic environments \u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

    Empowering Knowledge Bases: a Machine Learning Perspective

    Get PDF
    The construction of Knowledge Bases requires quite often the intervention of knowledge engineering and domain experts, resulting in a time consuming task. Alternative approaches have been developed for building knowledge bases from existing sources of information such as web pages and crowdsourcing; seminal examples are NELL, DBPedia, YAGO and several others. With the goal of building very large sources of knowledge, as recently for the case of Knowledge Graphs, even more complex integration processes have been set up, involving multiple sources of information, human expert intervention, crowdsourcing. Despite signiā€€- cant eā€€orts for making Knowledge Graphs as comprehensive and reliable as possible, they tend to suā€€er of incompleteness and noise, due to the complex building process. Nevertheless, even for highly human curated knowledge bases, cases of incompleteness can be found, for instance with disjointness axioms missing quite often. Machine learning methods have been proposed with the purpose of reā€€ning, enriching, completing and possibly raising potential issues in existing knowledge bases while showing the ability to cope with noise. The talk will concentrate on classes of mostly symbol-based machine learning methods, speciā€€cally focusing on concept learning, rule learning and disjointness axioms learning problems, showing how the developed methods can be exploited for enriching existing knowledge bases. During the talk it will be highlighted as, a key element of the illustrated solutions, is represented by the integration of: background knowledge, deductive reasoning and the evidence coming from the mass of the data. The last part of the talk will be devoted to the presentation of an approach for injecting background knowledge into numeric-based embedding models to be used for predictive tasks on Knowledge Graphs
    • ā€¦
    corecore