111,846 research outputs found
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
Abstract State Machines 1988-1998: Commented ASM Bibliography
An annotated bibliography of papers which deal with or use Abstract State
Machines (ASMs), as of January 1998.Comment: Also maintained as a BibTeX file at http://www.eecs.umich.edu/gasm
Ten virtues of structured graphs
This paper extends the invited talk by the first author about the virtues
of structured graphs. The motivation behind the talk and this paper relies on our
experience on the development of ADR, a formal approach for the design of styleconformant,
reconfigurable software systems. ADR is based on hierarchical graphs
with interfaces and it has been conceived in the attempt of reconciling software architectures
and process calculi by means of graphical methods. We have tried to
write an ADR agnostic paper where we raise some drawbacks of flat, unstructured
graphs for the design and analysis of software systems and we argue that hierarchical,
structured graphs can alleviate such drawbacks
HeteroGenius: A Framework for Hybrid Analysis of Heterogeneous Software Specifications
Nowadays, software artifacts are ubiquitous in our lives being an essential
part of home appliances, cars, cell phones, and even in more critical
activities like aeronautics and health sciences. In this context software
failures may produce enormous losses, either economical or, in the worst case,
in human lives. Software analysis is an area in software engineering concerned
with the application of diverse techniques in order to prove the absence of
errors in software pieces. In many cases different analysis techniques are
applied by following specific methodological combinations that ensure better
results. These interactions between tools are usually carried out at the user
level and it is not supported by the tools. In this work we present
HeteroGenius, a framework conceived to develop tools that allow users to
perform hybrid analysis of heterogeneous software specifications.
HeteroGenius was designed prioritising the possibility of adding new
specification languages and analysis tools and enabling a synergic relation of
the techniques under a graphical interface satisfying several well-known
usability enhancement criteria. As a case-study we implemented the
functionality of Dynamite on top of HeteroGenius.Comment: In Proceedings LAFM 2013, arXiv:1401.056
Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview
Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical
languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such
logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data,
some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate
complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those
properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking
properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered
trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees
On the logical definability of certain graph and poset languages
We show that it is equivalent, for certain sets of finite graphs, to be
definable in CMS (counting monadic second-order logic, a natural extension of
monadic second-order logic), and to be recognizable in an algebraic framework
induced by the notion of modular decomposition of a finite graph. More
precisely, we consider the set of composition operations on graphs
which occur in the modular decomposition of finite graphs. If is a subset
of , we say that a graph is an \calF-graph if it can be
decomposed using only operations in . A set of -graphs is recognizable if
it is a union of classes in a finite-index equivalence relation which is
preserved by the operations in . We show that if is finite and its
elements enjoy only a limited amount of commutativity -- a property which we
call weak rigidity, then recognizability is equivalent to CMS-definability.
This requirement is weak enough to be satisfied whenever all -graphs are
posets, that is, transitive dags. In particular, our result generalizes Kuske's
recent result on series-parallel poset languages
- ā¦