10,303 research outputs found
OperA/ALIVE/OperettA
Comprehensive models for organizations must, on the one hand, be able to specify global goals and requirements but, on the other hand, cannot assume that particular actors will always act according to the needs and expectations of the system design. Concepts as organizational rules (Zambonelli 2002), norms and institutions (Dignum and Dignum 2001; Esteva et al. 2002), and social structures (Parunak and Odell 2002) arise from the idea that the effective engineering of organizations needs high-level, actor-independent concepts and abstractions that explicitly define the organization in which agents live (Zambonelli 2002).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
A commentary on standardization in the Semantic Web, Common Logic and MultiAgent Systems
Given the ubiquity of the Web, the Semantic Web (SW) offers MultiAgent Systems (MAS) a most wide-ranging platform by which they could intercommunicate. It can be argued however that MAS require levels of logic that the current Semantic Web has yet to provide. As ISO Common Logic (CL) ISO/IEC IS 24707:2007 provides a firstorder logic capability for MAS in an interoperable way, it seems natural to investigate how CL may itself integrate with the SW thus providing a more expressive means by which MAS can interoperate effectively across the SW. A commentary is accordingly presented on how this may be achieved. Whilst it notes that certain limitations remain to be addressed, the commentary proposes that standardising the SW with CL provides the vehicle by which MAS can achieve their potential.</p
Geometric Aspects of Multiagent Systems
Recent advances in Multiagent Systems (MAS) and Epistemic Logic within
Distributed Systems Theory, have used various combinatorial structures that
model both the geometry of the systems and the Kripke model structure of models
for the logic. Examining one of the simpler versions of these models,
interpreted systems, and the related Kripke semantics of the logic (an
epistemic logic with -agents), the similarities with the geometric /
homotopy theoretic structure of groupoid atlases is striking. These latter
objects arise in problems within algebraic K-theory, an area of algebra linked
to the study of decomposition and normal form theorems in linear algebra. They
have a natural well structured notion of path and constructions of path
objects, etc., that yield a rich homotopy theory.Comment: 14 pages, 1 eps figure, prepared for GETCO200
Logic-Based Specification Languages for Intelligent Software Agents
The research field of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) aims to find
abstractions, languages, methodologies and toolkits for modeling, verifying,
validating and prototyping complex applications conceptualized as Multiagent
Systems (MASs). A very lively research sub-field studies how formal methods can
be used for AOSE. This paper presents a detailed survey of six logic-based
executable agent specification languages that have been chosen for their
potential to be integrated in our ARPEGGIO project, an open framework for
specifying and prototyping a MAS. The six languages are ConGoLog, Agent-0, the
IMPACT agent programming language, DyLog, Concurrent METATEM and Ehhf. For each
executable language, the logic foundations are described and an example of use
is shown. A comparison of the six languages and a survey of similar approaches
complete the paper, together with considerations of the advantages of using
logic-based languages in MAS modeling and prototyping.Comment: 67 pages, 1 table, 1 figure. Accepted for publication by the Journal
"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming", volume 4, Maurice Bruynooghe
Editor-in-Chie
Extend Commitment Protocols with Temporal Regulations: Why and How
The proposal of Elisa Marengo's thesis is to extend commitment protocols to
explicitly account for temporal regulations. This extension will satisfy two
needs: (1) it will allow representing, in a flexible and modular way, temporal
regulations with a normative force, posed on the interaction, so as to
represent conventions, laws and suchlike; (2) it will allow committing to
complex conditions, which describe not only what will be achieved but to some
extent also how. These two aspects will be deeply investigated in the proposal
of a unified framework, which is part of the ongoing work and will be included
in the thesis.Comment: Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium and Poster Session of the 5th
International Symposium on Rules (RuleML 2011@IJCAI), pages 1-8
(arXiv:1107.1686
Specification and Verification of Commitment-Regulated Data-Aware Multiagent Systems
In this paper we investigate multi agent systems whose agent interaction is based on social commitments that evolve over time, in presence of (possibly incomplete) data. In particular, we are interested in modeling and verifying how data maintained by the agents impact on the dynamics of such systems, and on the evolution of their commitments. This requires to lift the commitment-related conditions studied in the literature, which are typically based on propositional logics, to a first-order setting. To this purpose, we propose a rich framework for modeling data-aware commitment-based multiagent systems. In this framework, we study verification of rich temporal properties, establishing its decidability under the condition of “state-boundedness”, i.e., data items come from an infinite domain but, at every time point, each agent can store only a bounded number of them
Human-Agent Decision-making: Combining Theory and Practice
Extensive work has been conducted both in game theory and logic to model
strategic interaction. An important question is whether we can use these
theories to design agents for interacting with people? On the one hand, they
provide a formal design specification for agent strategies. On the other hand,
people do not necessarily adhere to playing in accordance with these
strategies, and their behavior is affected by a multitude of social and
psychological factors. In this paper we will consider the question of whether
strategies implied by theories of strategic behavior can be used by automated
agents that interact proficiently with people. We will focus on automated
agents that we built that need to interact with people in two negotiation
settings: bargaining and deliberation. For bargaining we will study game-theory
based equilibrium agents and for argumentation we will discuss logic-based
argumentation theory. We will also consider security games and persuasion games
and will discuss the benefits of using equilibrium based agents.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2015, arXiv:1606.0729
A Study of AI Population Dynamics with Million-agent Reinforcement Learning
We conduct an empirical study on discovering the ordered collective dynamics
obtained by a population of intelligence agents, driven by million-agent
reinforcement learning. Our intention is to put intelligent agents into a
simulated natural context and verify if the principles developed in the real
world could also be used in understanding an artificially-created intelligent
population. To achieve this, we simulate a large-scale predator-prey world,
where the laws of the world are designed by only the findings or logical
equivalence that have been discovered in nature. We endow the agents with the
intelligence based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL). In order to scale the
population size up to millions agents, a large-scale DRL training platform with
redesigned experience buffer is proposed. Our results show that the population
dynamics of AI agents, driven only by each agent's individual self-interest,
reveals an ordered pattern that is similar to the Lotka-Volterra model studied
in population biology. We further discover the emergent behaviors of collective
adaptations in studying how the agents' grouping behaviors will change with the
environmental resources. Both of the two findings could be explained by the
self-organization theory in nature.Comment: Full version of the paper presented at AAMAS 2018 (International
Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
- …