357,200 research outputs found
Programming in logic without logic programming
In previous work, we proposed a logic-based framework in which computation is
the execution of actions in an attempt to make reactive rules of the form if
antecedent then consequent true in a canonical model of a logic program
determined by an initial state, sequence of events, and the resulting sequence
of subsequent states. In this model-theoretic semantics, reactive rules are the
driving force, and logic programs play only a supporting role.
In the canonical model, states, actions and other events are represented with
timestamps. But in the operational semantics, for the sake of efficiency,
timestamps are omitted and only the current state is maintained. State
transitions are performed reactively by executing actions to make the
consequents of rules true whenever the antecedents become true. This
operational semantics is sound, but incomplete. It cannot make reactive rules
true by preventing their antecedents from becoming true, or by proactively
making their consequents true before their antecedents become true.
In this paper, we characterize the notion of reactive model, and prove that
the operational semantics can generate all and only such models. In order to
focus on the main issues, we omit the logic programming component of the
framework.Comment: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
(TPLP
Logic programming in the context of multiparadigm programming: the Oz experience
Oz is a multiparadigm language that supports logic programming as one of its
major paradigms. A multiparadigm language is designed to support different
programming paradigms (logic, functional, constraint, object-oriented,
sequential, concurrent, etc.) with equal ease. This article has two goals: to
give a tutorial of logic programming in Oz and to show how logic programming
fits naturally into the wider context of multiparadigm programming. Our
experience shows that there are two classes of problems, which we call
algorithmic and search problems, for which logic programming can help formulate
practical solutions. Algorithmic problems have known efficient algorithms.
Search problems do not have known efficient algorithms but can be solved with
search. The Oz support for logic programming targets these two problem classes
specifically, using the concepts needed for each. This is in contrast to the
Prolog approach, which targets both classes with one set of concepts, which
results in less than optimal support for each class. To explain the essential
difference between algorithmic and search programs, we define the Oz execution
model. This model subsumes both concurrent logic programming
(committed-choice-style) and search-based logic programming (Prolog-style).
Instead of Horn clause syntax, Oz has a simple, fully compositional,
higher-order syntax that accommodates the abilities of the language. We
conclude with lessons learned from this work, a brief history of Oz, and many
entry points into the Oz literature.Comment: 48 pages, to appear in the journal "Theory and Practice of Logic
Programming
Logic Programming for Describing and Solving Planning Problems
A logic programming paradigm which expresses solutions to problems as stable
models has recently been promoted as a declarative approach to solving various
combinatorial and search problems, including planning problems. In this
paradigm, all program rules are considered as constraints and solutions are
stable models of the rule set. This is a rather radical departure from the
standard paradigm of logic programming. In this paper we revisit abductive
logic programming and argue that it allows a programming style which is as
declarative as programming based on stable models. However, within abductive
logic programming, one has two kinds of rules. On the one hand predicate
definitions (which may depend on the abducibles) which are nothing else than
standard logic programs (with their non-monotonic semantics when containing
with negation); on the other hand rules which constrain the models for the
abducibles. In this sense abductive logic programming is a smooth extension of
the standard paradigm of logic programming, not a radical departure.Comment: 8 pages, no figures, Eighth International Workshop on Nonmonotonic
Reasoning, special track on Representing Actions and Plannin
Nominal Logic Programming
Nominal logic is an extension of first-order logic which provides a simple
foundation for formalizing and reasoning about abstract syntax modulo
consistent renaming of bound names (that is, alpha-equivalence). This article
investigates logic programming based on nominal logic. We describe some typical
nominal logic programs, and develop the model-theoretic, proof-theoretic, and
operational semantics of such programs. Besides being of interest for ensuring
the correct behavior of implementations, these results provide a rigorous
foundation for techniques for analysis and reasoning about nominal logic
programs, as we illustrate via examples.Comment: 46 pages; 19 page appendix; 13 figures. Revised journal submission as
of July 23, 200
Exploiting parallelism in coalgebraic logic programming
We present a parallel implementation of Coalgebraic Logic Programming (CoALP)
in the programming language Go. CoALP was initially introduced to reflect
coalgebraic semantics of logic programming, with coalgebraic derivation
algorithm featuring both corecursion and parallelism. Here, we discuss how the
coalgebraic semantics influenced our parallel implementation of logic
programming
Optimal Placement of Valves in a Water Distribution Network with CLP(FD)
This paper presents a new application of logic programming to a real-life
problem in hydraulic engineering. The work is developed as a collaboration of
computer scientists and hydraulic engineers, and applies Constraint Logic
Programming to solve a hard combinatorial problem. This application deals with
one aspect of the design of a water distribution network, i.e., the valve
isolation system design.
We take the formulation of the problem by Giustolisi and Savic (2008) and
show how, thanks to constraint propagation, we can get better solutions than
the best solution known in the literature for the Apulian distribution network.
We believe that the area of the so-called hydroinformatics can benefit from
the techniques developed in Constraint Logic Programming and possibly from
other areas of logic programming, such as Answer Set Programming.Comment: Best paper award at the 27th International Conference on Logic
Programming - ICLP 2011; Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, (ICLP'11)
Special Issue, volume 11, issue 4-5, 201
- …