On parallel versus sequential approximation

In this paper we deal with the class NCX of NP Optimization problems that are approximable within constant ratio in NC. This class is the parallel counterpart of the class APX. Our main motivation here is to reduce the study of sequential and parallel approximability to the same framework. To this aim, we first introduce a new kind of NC-reduction that preserves the relative error of the approximate solutions and show that the class NCX has {em complete} problems under this reducibility. An important subset of NCX is the class MAXSNP, we show that MAXSNP-complete problems have a threshold on the parallel approximation ratio that is, there are positive constants $epsilon_1$, $epsilon_2$ such that although the problem can be approximated in P within $epsilon_1$ it cannot be approximated in NC within epsilon_2$, unless P=NC. This result is attained by showing that the problem of approximating the value obtained through a non-oblivious local search algorithm is P-complete, for some values of the approximation ratio. Finally, we show that approximating through non-oblivious local search is in average NC.Postprint (published version

Approximate solution of NP optimization problems

AbstractThis paper presents the main results obtained in the field of approximation algorithms in a unified framework. Most of these results have been revisited in order to emphasize two basic tools useful for characterizing approximation classes, that is, combinatorial properties of problems and approximation preserving reducibilities. In particular, after reviewing the most important combinatorial characterizations of the classes PTAS and FPTAS, we concentrate on the class APX and, as a concluding result, we show that this class coincides with the class of optimization problems which are reducible to the maximum satisfiability problem with respect to a polynomial-time approximation preserving reducibility

An overview on polynomial approximation of NP-hard problems

The fact that polynomial time algorithm is very unlikely to be devised for an optimal solving of the NP-hard problems strongly motivates both the researchers and the practitioners to try to solve such problems heuristically, by making a trade-off between computational time and solution's quality. In other words, heuristic computation consists of trying to find not the best solution but one solution which is 'close to' the optimal one in reasonable time. Among the classes of heuristic methods for NP-hard problems, the polynomial approximation algorithms aim at solving a given NP-hard problem in poly-nomial time by computing feasible solutions that are, under some predefined criterion, as near to the optimal ones as possible. The polynomial approximation theory deals with the study of such algorithms. This survey first presents and analyzes time approximation algorithms for some classical examples of NP-hard problems. Secondly, it shows how classical notions and tools of complexity theory, such as polynomial reductions, can be matched with polynomial approximation in order to devise structural results for NP-hard optimization problems. Finally, it presents a quick description of what is commonly called inapproximability results. Such results provide limits on the approximability of the problems tackled

Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems

We survey results on the hardness of approximating combinatorial optimization problems