NEGATION TRIGGERS AND THEIR SCOPE

Recent interest in negation has resulted in a variety of different annotation schemes for different application tasks, several vetted in shared task competitions. Current negation detection systems are trained and tested for a specific application task within a particular domain. The availability of a robust, general negation detection module that can be added to any text processing pipeline is still missing. In this work we propose a linguistically motivated trigger and scope approach for negation detection in general. The system, NEGATOR, introduces two baseline modules: the scope module to identify the syntactic scope for different negation triggers and a variety of trigger lists evaluated for that purpose, ranging from minimal to extensive. The scope module consists of a set of specialized transformation rules that determine the scope of a negation trigger using dependency graphs from parser output. NEGATOR is evaluated on different corpora from different genres with different annotation schemes to establish general usefulness and robustness. The NEGATOR system also participated in two shared task competitions which address specific issues related to negation. Both these tasks presented an opportunity to demonstrate that the NEGATOR system can be easily adapted and extended to meet specific task requirements. The parallel, comparative evaluations suggest that NEGATOR is indeed a robust baseline system that is domain and task independent

Negated bio-events: Analysis and identification

Background: Negation occurs frequently in scientific literature, especially in biomedical literature. It has previously been reported that around 13% of sentences found in biomedical research articles contain negation. Historically, the main motivation for identifying negated events has been to ensure their exclusion from lists of extracted interactions. However, recently, there has been a growing interest in negative results, which has resulted in negation detection being identified as a key challenge in biomedical relation extraction. In this article, we focus on the problem of identifying negated bio-events, given gold standard event annotations.Results: We have conducted a detailed analysis of three open access bio-event corpora containing negation information (i.e., GENIA Event, BioInfer and BioNLP'09 ST), and have identified the main types of negated bio-events. We have analysed the key aspects of a machine learning solution to the problem of detecting negated events, including selection of negation cues, feature engineering and the choice of learning algorithm. Combining the best solutions for each aspect of the problem, we propose a novel framework for the identification of negated bio-events. We have evaluated our system on each of the three open access corpora mentioned above. The performance of the system significantly surpasses the best results previously reported on the BioNLP'09 ST corpus, and achieves even better results on the GENIA Event and BioInfer corpora, both of which contain more varied and complex events.Conclusions: Recently, in the field of biomedical text mining, the development and enhancement of event-based systems has received significant interest. The ability to identify negated events is a key performance element for these systems. We have conducted the first detailed study on the analysis and identification of negated bio-events. Our proposed framework can be integrated with state-of-the-art event extraction systems. The resulting systems will be able to extract bio-events with attached polarities from textual documents, which can serve as the foundation for more elaborate systems that are able to detect mutually contradicting bio-events. © 2013 Nawaz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

Negation and Speculation in NLP: A Survey, Corpora, Methods, and Applications

Negation and speculation are universal linguistic phenomena that affect the performance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications, such as those for opinion mining and information retrieval, especially in biomedical data. In this article, we review the corpora annotated with negation and speculation in various natural languages and domains. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing research into recent rule-based, supervised, and transfer learning techniques for the detection of negating and speculative content. Many English corpora for various domains are now annotated with negation and speculation; moreover, the availability of annotated corpora in other languages has started to increase. However, this growth is insufficient to address these important phenomena in languages with limited resources. The use of cross-lingual models and translation of the well-known languages are acceptable alternatives. We also highlight the lack of consistent annotation guidelines and the shortcomings of the existing techniques, and suggest alternatives that may speed up progress in this research direction. Adding more syntactic features may alleviate the limitations of the existing techniques, such as cue ambiguity and detecting the discontinuous scopes. In some NLP applications, inclusion of a system that is negation- and speculation-aware improves performance, yet this aspect is still not addressed or considered an essential step