659 research outputs found

    Linear-time algorithms for the subpath kernel

    Get PDF
    The subpath kernel is a useful positive definite kernel, which takes arbitrary rooted trees as input, no matter whether they are ordered or unordered, We first show that the subpath kernel can exhibit excellent classification performance in combination with SVM through an intensive experiment. Secondly, we develop a theory of irreducible trees, and then, using it as a rigid mathematical basis, reconstruct a bottom-up linear-time algorithm for the subtree kernel, which is a correction of an algorithm well-known in the literature. Thirdly, we show a novel top-down algorithm, with which we can realize a linear-time parallel-computing algorithm to compute the subpath kernel

    Lossy Kernelization

    Get PDF
    In this paper we propose a new framework for analyzing the performance of preprocessing algorithms. Our framework builds on the notion of kernelization from parameterized complexity. However, as opposed to the original notion of kernelization, our definitions combine well with approximation algorithms and heuristics. The key new definition is that of a polynomial size α\alpha-approximate kernel. Loosely speaking, a polynomial size α\alpha-approximate kernel is a polynomial time pre-processing algorithm that takes as input an instance (I,k)(I,k) to a parameterized problem, and outputs another instance (I,k)(I',k') to the same problem, such that I+kkO(1)|I'|+k' \leq k^{O(1)}. Additionally, for every c1c \geq 1, a cc-approximate solution ss' to the pre-processed instance (I,k)(I',k') can be turned in polynomial time into a (cα)(c \cdot \alpha)-approximate solution ss to the original instance (I,k)(I,k). Our main technical contribution are α\alpha-approximate kernels of polynomial size for three problems, namely Connected Vertex Cover, Disjoint Cycle Packing and Disjoint Factors. These problems are known not to admit any polynomial size kernels unless NPcoNP/polyNP \subseteq coNP/poly. Our approximate kernels simultaneously beat both the lower bounds on the (normal) kernel size, and the hardness of approximation lower bounds for all three problems. On the negative side we prove that Longest Path parameterized by the length of the path and Set Cover parameterized by the universe size do not admit even an α\alpha-approximate kernel of polynomial size, for any α1\alpha \geq 1, unless NPcoNP/polyNP \subseteq coNP/poly. In order to prove this lower bound we need to combine in a non-trivial way the techniques used for showing kernelization lower bounds with the methods for showing hardness of approximationComment: 58 pages. Version 2 contain new results: PSAKS for Cycle Packing and approximate kernel lower bounds for Set Cover and Hitting Set parameterized by universe siz

    Network Sparsification for Steiner Problems on Planar and Bounded-Genus Graphs

    Full text link
    We propose polynomial-time algorithms that sparsify planar and bounded-genus graphs while preserving optimal or near-optimal solutions to Steiner problems. Our main contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given an unweighted graph GG embedded on a surface of genus gg and a designated face ff bounded by a simple cycle of length kk, uncovers a set FE(G)F \subseteq E(G) of size polynomial in gg and kk that contains an optimal Steiner tree for any set of terminals that is a subset of the vertices of ff. We apply this general theorem to prove that: * given an unweighted graph GG embedded on a surface of genus gg and a terminal set SV(G)S \subseteq V(G), one can in polynomial time find a set FE(G)F \subseteq E(G) that contains an optimal Steiner tree TT for SS and that has size polynomial in gg and E(T)|E(T)|; * an analogous result holds for an optimal Steiner forest for a set SS of terminal pairs; * given an unweighted planar graph GG and a terminal set SV(G)S \subseteq V(G), one can in polynomial time find a set FE(G)F \subseteq E(G) that contains an optimal (edge) multiway cut CC separating SS and that has size polynomial in C|C|. In the language of parameterized complexity, these results imply the first polynomial kernels for Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest on planar and bounded-genus graphs (parameterized by the size of the tree and forest, respectively) and for (Edge) Multiway Cut on planar graphs (parameterized by the size of the cutset). Additionally, we obtain a weighted variant of our main contribution

    TREEWIDTH and PATHWIDTH parameterized by vertex cover

    Full text link
    After the number of vertices, Vertex Cover is the largest of the classical graph parameters and has more and more frequently been used as a separate parameter in parameterized problems, including problems that are not directly related to the Vertex Cover. Here we consider the TREEWIDTH and PATHWIDTH problems parameterized by k, the size of a minimum vertex cover of the input graph. We show that the PATHWIDTH and TREEWIDTH can be computed in O*(3^k) time. This complements recent polynomial kernel results for TREEWIDTH and PATHWIDTH parameterized by the Vertex Cover

    Feedback Vertex Set Inspired Kernel for Chordal Vertex Deletion

    Full text link
    Given a graph GG and a parameter kk, the Chordal Vertex Deletion (CVD) problem asks whether there exists a subset UV(G)U\subseteq V(G) of size at most kk that hits all induced cycles of size at least 4. The existence of a polynomial kernel for CVD was a well-known open problem in the field of Parameterized Complexity. Recently, Jansen and Pilipczuk resolved this question affirmatively by designing a polynomial kernel for CVD of size O(k161log58k)O(k^{161}\log^{58}k), and asked whether one can design a kernel of size O(k10)O(k^{10}). While we do not completely resolve this question, we design a significantly smaller kernel of size O(k12log10k)O(k^{12}\log^{10}k), inspired by the O(k2)O(k^2)-size kernel for Feedback Vertex Set. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of the independence degree of a vertex, which is our main conceptual contribution
    corecore