1,380 research outputs found

    Statistical modeling of skewed data using newly formed parametric distributions

    Full text link
    Several newly formed continuous parametric distributions are introduced to analyze skewed data. Firstly, a two-parameter smooth continuous lognormal-Pareto composite distribution is introduced for modeling highly positively skewed data. The new density is a lognormal density up to an unknown threshold value and a Pareto density for the remainder. The resulting density is similar in shape to the lognormal density, yet its upper tail is larger than the lognormal density and the tail behavior is quite similar to the Pareto density. Parameter estimation methods and the goodness-of-fit criterion for the new distribution are presented. A large actuarial data set is analyzed to illustrate the better fit and applicability of the new distribution over other leading distributions. Secondly, the Odd Weibull family is introduced for modeling data with a wide variety of hazard functions. This three-parameter family is derived by considering the distributions of the odds of the Weibull and inverse Weibull families. As a result, the Odd Weibull family is not only useful for testing goodness-of-fit of the Weibull and inverse Weibull as submodels, but it is also convenient for modeling and fitting different data sets, especially in the presence of censoring and truncation. This newly formed family not only possesses all five major hazard shapes: constant, increasing, decreasing, bathtub-shaped and unimodal failure rates, but also has wide variety of density shapes. The model parameters for exact, grouped, censored and truncated data are estimated in two different ways due to the fact that the inverse transformation of the Odd Weibull family does not change its density function. Examples are provided based on survival, reliability, and environmental sciences data to illustrate the variety of density and hazard shapes by analyzing complete and incomplete data. Thirdly, the two-parameter logistic-sinh distribution is introduced for modeling highly negatively skewed data with extreme observations. The resulting family provides not only negatively skewed densities with thick tails, but also variety of monotonic density shapes. The advantages of using the proposed family are demonstrated and compared by illustrating well-known examples. Finally, the folded parametric families are introduced to model the positively skewed data with zero data values

    Some recent developments in microeconometrics: A survey

    Get PDF
    This paper summarizes some recent developments in rnicroeconometrics with respect to methods for estimation and inference in non-linear models based on cross-section and panel data. In particular we discuss recent progress in estimation with conditional moment restrictions, simulation methods, serniparametric methods, as well as specification tests. We use the binary cross-section and panel probit model to illustrate the application of some of the theoretical results. --

    Vol. 13, No. 2 (Full Issue)

    Get PDF

    계측적 κ°€λŠ₯도λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ λΆˆμ™„μ „ 자료 뢄석

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : μžμ—°κ³Όν•™λŒ€ν•™ 톡계학과, 2022. 8. μž„μš”ν•œ.The h-likelihood has been proposed as an extension of Fisher's likelihood to allow the maximum likelihood estimation for statistical models including unobserved latent variables of recent interest. However, the current h-likelihood approach does not allow maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of variance components as Henderson’s joint likelihood (1959) does not in linear mixed models. In this thesis, we discuss how to form the canonical scale for the h-likelihood in order to facilitate joint maximization for MLEs of whole parameters. To show the usefulness of the h-likelihood for analyzing incomplete data, various types of unobserved latent variables are examined; missing data, random effect and censored data. As we shall see, a statistical model for unobserved latent variables may not be identifiable based on the observed data. Thus, we also present how to make robust inferences against various assumptions on statistical models.계측적 κ°€λŠ₯λ„λŠ” κ³ μ •λœ λͺ¨μˆ˜λ§Œμ„ μ·¨κΈ‰ν•˜λ˜ 기쑴의 κ°€λŠ₯도λ₯Ό ν™•μž₯ν•˜μ—¬ κ΄€μΈ‘λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 잠재 λ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•˜λŠ” 톡계 λͺ¨ν˜•μ— λŒ€ν•΄ μ΅œλŒ€ κ°€λŠ₯도 좔정을 ν—ˆλ½ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ œμ•ˆλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, 기쑴의 계측적 κ°€λŠ₯λ„λŠ” λΆ„μ‚° 성뢄을 ν¬ν•¨ν•œ λͺ¨λ“  μΆ”μ •μ˜ λŒ€μƒμ— λŒ€ν•΄ μ΅œλŒ€ κ°€λŠ₯도 좔정을 ν—ˆλ½ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œλ‹€λŠ” ν•œκ³„κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 계측적 κ°€λŠ₯λ„μ˜ μ •μ€€ μ²™λ„μ˜ μ„±μ§ˆμ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³Έ λ’€, 이λ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ λͺ¨λ“  λͺ¨μˆ˜λ“€μ˜ μ΅œλŒ€ κ°€λŠ₯도 μΆ”μ •λŸ‰μ„ μ–»λŠ” 방법에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ λ…Όμ˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λΆˆμ™„μ „ 자료의 μ˜ˆλ‘œλŠ” κ²°μΈ‘ 자료, λ³€λŸ‰ 효과, 쀑도 μ ˆλ‹¨ 자료 등이 μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λΆˆμ™„μ „ μžλ£Œμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬, 계측적 κ°€λŠ₯도λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ 톡계적 μΆ”λ‘ μ˜ μœ μš©μ„±μ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, κ΄€μΈ‘λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 잠재 λ³€μˆ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 톡계 λͺ¨ν˜•μ˜ 경우, κ΄€μΈ‘λœ μžλ£Œλ‘œλΆ€ν„° 항상 식별 κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ„ 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ, λ³Έ ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 톡계 λͺ¨ν˜•μ— μ‚¬μš©λ˜λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 가정듀에 λŒ€ν•΄ λ‘œλ²„μŠ€νŠΈν•œ 좔둠을 ν—ˆλ½ν•˜λŠ” 방법도 ν•¨κ»˜ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.1 Introduction (1) 1.1 Maximum Likelihood Imputation (2) 1.2 Robust Imputation under Missing at Random (5) 1.3 Enhanced Laplace Approximation (8) 1.4 Accelerated Failure Time Random Effect Model with GEV Distribution (10) 2 Maximum Likelihood Imputation (12) 2.1 Basic Setup (14) 2.2 H-likelihood (16) 2.2.1 MLE of Fixed Parameter (20) 2.2.2 MLE of Random Parameter (21) 2.3 Scale for Joint Maximization (30) 2.4 ML Imputation (32) 2.5 Illustrative Examples (36) 2.5.1 Normal Regression Model (36) 2.5.2 Exponential Regression Model (37) 2.5.3 Tobit Regression Model (37) 2.6 Conclusion (40) 3 Robust Imputation under Missing at Random (46) 3.1 Basic Setup (48) 3.2 Semiparametric Outcome Regression Model (50) 3.3 Misspecification of Propensity Score Model (53) 3.4 Outliers in Outcome Regression Model (57) 3.5 Simulation Study (59) 3.5.1 Robustness against Model Misspecification (60) 3.5.2 Robustness against Outliers (63) 3.6 Conclusion (63) 4 Enhanced Laplace Approximation (71) 4.1 Review of the LA (73) 4.2 ELA (75) 4.3 Restricted Likelihood (79) 4.4 Salamander Mating Data (82) 4.4.1 Summer Data (83) 4.4.2 Pooled Data (86) 4.5 Rongelap Spatial Data (88) 4.6 Conclusion (94) 5 AFT Random Effect Model with GEV Distribution (98) 5.1 Model (100) 5.1.1 GEV Distribution (100) 5.1.2 AFT Random Effect Model with GEV Distribution (100) 5.2 Estimation Procedure (102) 5.3 Simulation Study (104) 5.4 Real Data Analysis: COHRI Data (107) 5.5 Conclusion (110) Bibliography (117) Abstract (in Korean) (130)λ°•

    Vol. 13, No. 1 (Full Issue)

    Get PDF

    Modified Maximum Likelihood Estimation from Censored Samples in Burr Type X Distribution

    Full text link
    • …
    corecore