Lexicographic refinements in possibilistic decision trees and finite-horizon Markov decision processes

Possibilistic decision theory has been proposed twenty years ago and has had several extensions since then. Even though ap-pealing for its ability to handle qualitative decision problems, possibilisticdecision theory suffers from an important drawback. Qualitative possibilistic utility criteria compare acts through min and max operators, which leads to a drowning effect. To over-come this lack of decision power of the theory, several refinements have been proposed. Lexicographic refinements are particularly appealing since they allow to benefit from the Expected Utility background, while remaining qualitative. This article aims at extend-ing lexicographic refinements to sequential decision problems i.e., to possibilistic decision trees and possibilistic Markov decision processes, when the horizon is finite. We present two criteria that refine qualitative possibilistic utilities and provide dynamic programming algorithms for calculating lexicographically optimal policies

Lexicographic refinements in possibilistic sequential decision-making models

Ce travail contribue à la théorie de la décision possibiliste et plus précisément à la prise de décision séquentielle dans le cadre de la théorie des possibilités, à la fois au niveau théorique et pratique. Bien qu'attrayante pour sa capacité à résoudre les problèmes de décision qualitatifs, la théorie de la décision possibiliste souffre d'un inconvénient important : les critères d'utilité qualitatives possibilistes comparent les actions avec les opérateurs min et max, ce qui entraîne un effet de noyade. Pour surmonter ce manque de pouvoir décisionnel, plusieurs raffinements ont été proposés dans la littérature. Les raffinements lexicographiques sont particulièrement intéressants puisqu'ils permettent de bénéficier de l'arrière-plan de l'utilité espérée, tout en restant "qualitatifs". Cependant, ces raffinements ne sont définis que pour les problèmes de décision non séquentiels. Dans cette thèse, nous présentons des résultats sur l'extension des raffinements lexicographiques aux problèmes de décision séquentiels, en particulier aux Arbres de Décision et aux Processus Décisionnels de Markov possibilistes. Cela aboutit à des nouveaux algorithmes de planification plus "décisifs" que leurs contreparties possibilistes. Dans un premier temps, nous présentons des relations de préférence lexicographiques optimistes et pessimistes entre les politiques avec et sans utilités intermédiaires, qui raffinent respectivement les utilités possibilistes optimistes et pessimistes. Nous prouvons que les critères proposés satisfont le principe de l'efficacité de Pareto ainsi que la propriété de monotonie stricte. Cette dernière garantit la possibilité d'application d'un algorithme de programmation dynamique pour calculer des politiques optimales. Nous étudions tout d'abord l'optimisation lexicographique des politiques dans les Arbres de Décision possibilistes et les Processus Décisionnels de Markov à horizon fini. Nous fournissons des adaptations de l'algorithme de programmation dynamique qui calculent une politique optimale en temps polynomial. Ces algorithmes sont basés sur la comparaison lexicographique des matrices de trajectoires associées aux sous-politiques. Ce travail algorithmique est complété par une étude expérimentale qui montre la faisabilité et l'intérêt de l'approche proposée. Ensuite, nous prouvons que les critères lexicographiques bénéficient toujours d'une fondation en termes d'utilité espérée, et qu'ils peuvent être capturés par des utilités espérées infinitésimales. La dernière partie de notre travail est consacrée à l'optimisation des politiques dans les Processus Décisionnels de Markov (éventuellement infinis) stationnaires. Nous proposons un algorithme d'itération de la valeur pour le calcul des politiques optimales lexicographiques. De plus, nous étendons ces résultats au cas de l'horizon infini. La taille des matrices augmentant exponentiellement (ce qui est particulièrement problématique dans le cas de l'horizon infini), nous proposons un algorithme d'approximation qui se limite à la partie la plus intéressante de chaque matrice de trajectoires, à savoir les premières lignes et colonnes. Enfin, nous rapportons des résultats expérimentaux qui prouvent l'efficacité des algorithmes basés sur la troncation des matrices.This work contributes to possibilistic decision theory and more specifically to sequential decision-making under possibilistic uncertainty, at both the theoretical and practical levels. Even though appealing for its ability to handle qualitative decision problems, possibilisitic decision theory suffers from an important drawback: qualitative possibilistic utility criteria compare acts through min and max operators, which leads to a drowning effect. To overcome this lack of decision power, several refinements have been proposed in the literature. Lexicographic refinements are particularly appealing since they allow to benefit from the expected utility background, while remaining "qualitative". However, these refinements are defined for the non-sequential decision problems only. In this thesis, we present results on the extension of the lexicographic preference relations to sequential decision problems, in particular, to possibilistic Decision trees and Markov Decision Processes. This leads to new planning algorithms that are more "decisive" than their original possibilistic counterparts. We first present optimistic and pessimistic lexicographic preference relations between policies with and without intermediate utilities that refine the optimistic and pessimistic qualitative utilities respectively. We prove that these new proposed criteria satisfy the principle of Pareto efficiency as well as the property of strict monotonicity. This latter guarantees that dynamic programming algorithm can be used for calculating lexicographic optimal policies. Considering the problem of policy optimization in possibilistic decision trees and finite-horizon Markov decision processes, we provide adaptations of dynamic programming algorithm that calculate lexicographic optimal policy in polynomial time. These algorithms are based on the lexicographic comparison of the matrices of trajectories associated to the sub-policies. This algorithmic work is completed with an experimental study that shows the feasibility and the interest of the proposed approach. Then we prove that the lexicographic criteria still benefit from an Expected Utility grounding, and can be represented by infinitesimal expected utilities. The last part of our work is devoted to policy optimization in (possibly infinite) stationary Markov Decision Processes. We propose a value iteration algorithm for the computation of lexicographic optimal policies. We extend these results to the infinite-horizon case. Since the size of the matrices increases exponentially (which is especially problematic in the infinite-horizon case), we thus propose an approximation algorithm which keeps the most interesting part of each matrix of trajectories, namely the first lines and columns. Finally, we reports experimental results that show the effectiveness of the algorithms based on the cutting of the matrices

Graphical preference representation under a possibilistic framework

La modélisation structurée de préférences, fondée sur les notions d'indépendance préférentielle, a un potentiel énorme pour fournir des approches efficaces pour la représentation et le raisonnement sur les préférences des décideurs dans les applications de la vie réelle. Cette thèse soulève la question de la représentation des préférences par une structure graphique. Nous proposons une nouvelle lecture de réseaux possibilistes, que nous appelons p-pref nets, où les degrés de possibilité représentent des degrés de satisfaction. L'approche utilise des poids de possibilité non instanciés (appelés poids symboliques), pour définir les tables de préférences conditionnelles. Ces tables donnent naissance à des vecteurs de poids symboliques qui codent les préférences qui sont satisfaites et celles qui sont violées dans un contexte donné. Nous nous concentrons ensuite sur les aspects théoriques de la manipulation de ces vecteurs. En effet, la comparaison de ces vecteurs peut s'appuyer sur différentes méthodes: celles induites par la règle de chaînage basée sur le produit ou celle basée sur le minimum que sous-tend le réseau possibiliste, les raffinements du minimum le discrimin, ou leximin, ainsi que l'ordre Pareto, et le Pareto symétrique qui le raffine. Nous prouvons que la comparaison par produit correspond exactement au celle du Pareto symétrique et nous nous concentrons sur les avantages de ce dernier par rapport aux autres méthodes. En outre, nous montrons que l'ordre du produit est consistant avec celui obtenu en comparant des ensembles de préférences satisfaites des tables. L'image est complétée par la proposition des algorithmes d'optimisation et de dominance pour les p-pref nets. Dans ce travail, nous discutons divers outils graphiques pour la représentation des préférences. Nous nous focalisons en particulier sur les CP-nets car ils partagent la même structure graphique que les p-pref nets et sont basés sur la même nature de préférences. Nous prouvons que les ordres induits par les CP-nets ne peuvent pas contredire ceux des p-pref nets et nous avons fixé les contraintes nécessaires pour raffiner les ordres des p-pref nets afin de capturer les contraintes Ceteris Paribus des CP-nets. Cela indique que les CP-nets représentent potentiellement une sous-classe des p-pref nets avec des contraintes. Ensuite, nous fournissons une comparaison approfondie entre les différents modèles graphiques qualitatifs et quantitatifs, et les p-pref nets. Nous en déduisons que ces derniers peuvent être placés à mi- chemin entre les modèles qualitatifs et les modèles quantitatifs puisqu'ils ne nécessitent pas une instanciation complète des poids symboliques alors que des informations supplémentaires sur l'importance des poids peuvent être prises en compte. La dernière partie de ce travail est consacrée à l'extension du modèle proposé pour représenter les préférences de plusieurs agents. Dans un premier temps, nous proposons l'utilisation de réseaux possibilistes où les préférences sont de type tout ou rien et nous définissons le conditionnement dans le cas de distributions booléennes. Nous montrons par ailleurs que ces réseaux multi-agents ont une contrepartie logique utile pour vérifier la cohérence des agents. Nous expliquons les étapes principales pour transformer ces réseaux en format logique. Enfin, nous décrivons une extension pour représenter des préférences nuancées et fournissons des algorithmes pour les requêtes d'optimisation et de dominance.Structured modeling of preference statements, grounded in the notions of preferential independence, has tremendous potential to provide efficient approaches for modeling and reasoning about decision maker preferences in real-life applications. This thesis raises the question of representing preferences through a graphical structure. We propose a new reading of possibilistic networks, that we call p-pref nets, where possibility weights represent satisfaction degrees. The approach uses non-instantiated possibility weights, which we call symbolic weights, to define conditional preference tables. These conditional preference tables give birth to vectors of symbolic weights that reflect the preferences that are satisfied and those that are violated in a considered situation. We then focus on the theoretical aspects of handling of these vectors. Indeed, the comparison of such vectors may rely on different orderings: the ones induced by the product-based, or the minimum based chain rule underlying the possibilistic network, the discrimin, or leximin refinements of the minimum- based ordering, as well as Pareto ordering, and the symmetric Pareto ordering that refines it. We prove that the product-based comparison corresponds exactly to symmetric Pareto and we focus on its assets compared to the other ordering methods. Besides, we show that productbased ordering is consistent with the ordering obtained by comparing sets of satisfied preference tables. The picture is then completed by the proposition of algorithms for handling optimization and dominance queries. In this work we discuss various graphical tools for preference representation. We shed light particularly on CP-nets since they share the same graphical structure as p-pref nets and are based on the same preference statements. We prove that the CP-net orderings cannot contradict those of the p-pref nets and we found suitable additional constraints to refine p-pref net orderings in order to capture Ceteris Paribus constraints of CP-nets. This indicates that CP-nets potentially represent a subclass of p-pref nets with constraints. Finally, we provide an thorough comparison between the different qualitative and quantitative graphical models and p-pref nets. We deduce that the latter can be positioned halfway between qualitative and quantitative models since they do not need a full instantiation of the symbolic weights while additional information about the relative strengths of these weights can be taken into account. The last part of this work is dedicated to extent the proposed model to represent multiple agents preferences. As a first step, we propose the use of possibilistic networks for representing all or nothing multiple agents preferences and define conditioning in the case of Boolean possibilities. These multiple agents networks have a logical counterpart helpful for checking agents consistency. We explain the main steps for transforming multiple agents networks into logical format. Finally, we outline an extension with priority levels of these networks and provide algorithms for handling optimization and dominance queries

Sorted-pareto dominance: an extension to pareto dominance and its application in soft constraints

The Pareto dominance relation compares decisions with each other over multiple aspects, and any decision that is not dominated by another is called Pareto optimal, which is a desirable property in decision making. However, the Pareto dominance relation is not very discerning, and often leads to a large number of non-dominated or Pareto optimal decisions. By strengthening the relation, we can narrow down this nondominated set of decisions to a smaller set, e.g., for presenting a smaller number of more interesting decisions to a decision maker. In this paper, we look at a particular strengthening of the Pareto dominance called Sorted-Pareto dominance, giving some properties that characterise the relation, and giving a semantics in the context of decision making under uncertainty. We then examine the use of the relation in a Soft Constraints setting, and explore some algorithms for generating Sorted-Pareto optimal solutions to Soft Constraints problems

Reasoning about Typicality and Probabilities in Preferential Description Logics

In this work we describe preferential Description Logics of typicality, a nonmonotonic extension of standard Description Logics by means of a typicality operator T allowing to extend a knowledge base with inclusions of the form T(C) v D, whose intuitive meaning is that normally/typically Cs are also Ds. This extension is based on a minimal model semantics corresponding to a notion of rational closure, built upon preferential models. We recall the basic concepts underlying preferential Description Logics. We also present two extensions of the preferential semantics: on the one hand, we consider probabilistic extensions, based on a distributed semantics that is suitable for tackling the problem of commonsense concept combination, on the other hand, we consider other strengthening of the rational closure semantics and construction to avoid the so-called blocking of property inheritance problem.Comment: 17 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1811.0236

The Role of preferences in logic programming: nonmonotonic reasoning, user preferences, decision under uncertainty

Intelligent systems that assist users in fulfilling complex tasks need a concise and processable representation of incomplete and uncertain information. In order to be able to choose among different options, these systems also need a compact and processable representation of the concept of preference. Preferences can provide an effective way to choose the best solutions to a given problem. These solutions can represent the most plausible states of the world when we model incomplete information, the most satisfactory states of the world when we express user preferences, or optimal decisions when we make decisions under uncertainty. Several domains, such as, reasoning under incomplete and uncertain information, user preference modeling, and qualitative decision making under uncertainty, have benefited from advances on preference representation. In the literature, several symbolic approaches of nonclassical reasoning have been proposed. Among them, logic programming under answer set semantics offers a good compromise between symbolic representation and computation of knowledge and several extensions for handling preferences. Nevertheless, there are still some open issues to be considered in logic programming. In nonmonotonic reasoning, first, most approaches assume that exceptions to logic program rules are already specified. However, sometimes, it is possible to consider implicit preferences based on the specificity of the rules to handle incomplete information. Secondly, the joint handling of exceptions and uncertainty has received little attention: when information is uncertain, the selection of default rules can be a matter of explicit preferences and uncertainty. In user preference modeling, although existing logic programming specifications allow to express user preferences which depend both on incomplete and contextual information, in some applications, some preferences in some context may be more important than others. Furthermore, more complex preference expressions need to be supported. In qualitative decision making under uncertainty, existing logic programming-based methodologies for making decisions seem to lack a satisfactory handling of preferences and uncertainty. The aim of this dissertation is twofold: 1) to tackle the role played by preferences in logic programming from different perspectives, and 2) to contribute to this novel field by proposing several frameworks and methods able to address the above issues. To this end, we will first show how preferences can be used to select default rules in logic programs in an implicit and explicit way. In particular, we propose (i) a method for selecting logic program rules based on specificity, and (ii) a framework for selecting uncertain default rules based on explicit preferences and the certainty of the rules. Then, we will see how user preferences can be modeled and processed in terms of a logic program (iii) in order to manage user profiles in a context-aware system and (iv) in order to propose a framework for the specification of nested (non-flat) preference expressions. Finally, in the attempt to bridge the gap between logic programming and qualitative decision under uncertainty, (v) we propose a classical- and a possibilistic-based logic programming methodology to compute an optimal decision when uncertainty and preferences are matters of degrees.Els sistemes intel.ligents que assisteixen a usuaris en la realització de tasques complexes necessiten una representació concisa i formal de la informació que permeti un raonament nomonòton en condicions d’incertesa. Per a poder escollir entre les diferents opcions, aquests sistemes solen necessitar una representació del concepte de preferència. Les preferències poden proporcionar una manera efectiva de triar entre les millors solucions a un problema. Aquestes solucions poden representar els estats del món més plausibles quan es tracta de modelar informació incompleta, els estats del món més satisfactori quan expressem preferències de l’usuari, o decisions òptimes quan estem parlant de presa de decisió incorporant incertesa. L’ús de les preferències ha beneficiat diferents dominis, com, el raonament en presència d’informació incompleta i incerta, el modelat de preferències d’usuari, i la presa de decisió sota incertesa. En la literatura, s’hi troben diferents aproximacions al raonament no clàssic basades en una representació simbòlica de la informació. Entre elles, l’enfocament de programació lògica, utilitzant la semàntica de answer set, ofereix una bona aproximació entre representació i processament simbòlic del coneixement, i diferents extensions per gestionar les preferències. No obstant això, en programació lògica es poden identificar diferents problemes pel que fa a la gestió de les preferències. Per exemple, en la majoria d’enfocaments de raonament no-monòton s’assumeix que les excepcions a default rules d’un programa lògic ja estan expressades. Però de vegades es poden considerar preferències implícites basades en l’especificitat de les regles per gestionar la informació incompleta. A més, quan la informació és també incerta, la selecció de default rules pot dependre de preferències explícites i de la incertesa. En el modelatge de preferències del usuari, encara que els formalismes existents basats en programació lògica permetin expressar preferències que depenen d’informació contextual i incompleta, en algunes aplicacions, donat un context, algunes preferències poden ser més importants que unes altres. Per tant, resulta d’interès un llenguatge que permeti capturar preferències més complexes. En la presa de decisions sota incertesa, les metodologies basades en programació lògica creades fins ara no ofereixen una solució del tot satisfactòria pel que fa a la gestió de les preferències i la incertesa. L’objectiu d’aquesta tesi és doble: 1) estudiar el paper de les preferències en la programació lògica des de diferents perspectives, i 2) contribuir a aquesta jove àrea d’investigació proposant diferents marcs teòrics i mètodes per abordar els problemes anteriorment citats. Per a aquest propòsit veurem com les preferències es poden utilitzar de manera implícita i explícita per a la selecció de default rules proposant: (i) un mètode basat en l’especificitat de les regles, que permeti seleccionar regles en un programa lògic; (ii) un marc teòric per a la selecció de default rules incertes basat en preferències explícites i la incertesa de les regles. També veurem com les preferències de l’usuari poden ser modelades i processades usant un enfocament de programació lògica (iii) que suporti la creació d’un mecanisme de gestió dels perfils dels usuaris en un sistema amb reconeixement del context; (iv) que permeti proposar un marc teòric capaç d’expressar preferències amb fòrmules imbricades. Per últim, amb l’objectiu de disminuir la distància entre programació lògica i la presa de decisió amb incertesa proposem (v) una metodologia basada en programació lògica clàssica i en una extensió de la programació lògica que incorpora lògica possibilística per modelar un problema de presa de decisions i per inferir una decisió òptima.Los sistemas inteligentes que asisten a usuarios en tareas complejas necesitan una representación concisa y procesable de la información que permita un razonamiento nomonótono e incierto. Para poder escoger entre las diferentes opciones, estos sistemas suelen necesitar una representación del concepto de preferencia. Las preferencias pueden proporcionar una manera efectiva para elegir entre las mejores soluciones a un problema. Dichas soluciones pueden representar los estados del mundo más plausibles cuando hablamos de representación de información incompleta, los estados del mundo más satisfactorios cuando hablamos de preferencias del usuario, o decisiones óptimas cuando estamos hablando de toma de decisión con incertidumbre. El uso de las preferencias ha beneficiado diferentes dominios, como, razonamiento en presencia de información incompleta e incierta, modelado de preferencias de usuario, y toma de decisión con incertidumbre. En la literatura, distintos enfoques simbólicos de razonamiento no clásico han sido creados. Entre ellos, la programación lógica con la semántica de answer set ofrece un buen acercamiento entre representación y procesamiento simbólico del conocimiento, y diferentes extensiones para manejar las preferencias. Sin embargo, en programación lógica se pueden identificar diferentes problemas con respecto al manejo de las preferencias. Por ejemplo, en la mayoría de enfoques de razonamiento no-monótono se asume que las excepciones a default rules de un programa lógico ya están expresadas. Pero, a veces se pueden considerar preferencias implícitas basadas en la especificidad de las reglas para manejar la información incompleta. Además, cuando la información es también incierta, la selección de default rules pueden depender de preferencias explícitas y de la incertidumbre. En el modelado de preferencias, aunque los formalismos existentes basados en programación lógica permitan expresar preferencias que dependen de información contextual e incompleta, in algunas aplicaciones, algunas preferencias en un contexto puede ser más importantes que otras. Por lo tanto, un lenguaje que permita capturar preferencias más complejas es deseable. En la toma de decisiones con incertidumbre, las metodologías basadas en programación lógica creadas hasta ahora no ofrecen una solución del todo satisfactoria al manejo de las preferencias y la incertidumbre. El objectivo de esta tesis es doble: 1) estudiar el rol de las preferencias en programación lógica desde diferentes perspectivas, y 2) contribuir a esta joven área de investigación proponiendo diferentes marcos teóricos y métodos para abordar los problemas anteriormente citados. Para este propósito veremos como las preferencias pueden ser usadas de manera implícita y explícita para la selección de default rules proponiendo: (i) un método para seleccionar reglas en un programa basado en la especificad de las reglas; (ii) un marco teórico para la selección de default rules basado en preferencias explícitas y incertidumbre. También veremos como las preferencias del usuario pueden ser modeladas y procesadas usando un enfoque de programación lógica (iii) para crear un mecanismo de manejo de los perfiles de los usuarios en un sistema con reconocimiento del contexto; (iv) para crear un marco teórico capaz de expresar preferencias con formulas anidadas. Por último, con el objetivo de disminuir la distancia entre programación lógica y la toma de decisión con incertidumbre proponemos (v) una metodología para modelar un problema de toma de decisiones y para inferir una decisión óptima usando un enfoque de programación lógica clásica y uno de programación lógica extendida con lógica posibilística.Sistemi intelligenti, destinati a fornire supporto agli utenti in processi decisionali complessi, richiedono una rappresentazione dell’informazione concisa, formale e che permetta di ragionare in maniera non monotona e incerta. Per poter scegliere tra le diverse opzioni, tali sistemi hanno bisogno di disporre di una rappresentazione del concetto di preferenza altrettanto concisa e formale. Le preferenze offrono una maniera efficace per scegliere le miglior soluzioni di un problema. Tali soluzioni possono rappresentare gli stati del mondo più credibili quando si tratta di ragionamento non monotono, gli stati del mondo più soddisfacenti quando si tratta delle preferenze degli utenti, o le decisioni migliori quando prendiamo una decisione in condizioni di incertezza. Diversi domini come ad esempio il ragionamento non monotono e incerto, la strutturazione del profilo utente, e i modelli di decisione in condizioni d’incertezza hanno tratto beneficio dalla rappresentazione delle preferenze. Nella bibliografia disponibile si possono incontrare diversi approcci simbolici al ragionamento non classico. Tra questi, la programmazione logica con answer set semantics offre un buon compromesso tra rappresentazione simbolica e processamento dell’informazione, e diversi estensioni per la gestione delle preferenze sono state proposti in tal senso. Nonostante ció, nella programmazione logica esistono ancora delle problematiche aperte. Prima di tutto, nella maggior parte degli approcci al ragionamento non monotono, si suppone che nel programma le eccezioni alle regole siano già specificate. Tuttavia, a volte per trattare l’informazione incompleta è possibile prendere in considerazione preferenze implicite basate sulla specificità delle regole. In secondo luogo, la gestione congiunta di eccezioni e incertezza ha avuto scarsa attenzione: quando l’informazione è incerta, la scelta di default rule può essere una questione di preferenze esplicite e d’incertezza allo stesso tempo. Nella creazione di preferenze dell’utente, anche se le specifiche di programmazione logica esistenti permettono di esprimere preferenze che dipendono sia da un’informazione incompleta che da una contestuale, in alcune applicazioni talune preferenze possono essere più importanti di altre, o espressioni più complesse devono essere supportate. In un processo decisionale con incertezza, le metodologie basate sulla programmazione logica viste sinora, non offrono una gestione soddisfacente delle preferenze e dell’incertezza. Lo scopo di questa dissertazione è doppio: 1) chiarire il ruolo che le preferenze giocano nella programmazione logica da diverse prospettive e 2) contribuire proponendo in questo nuovo settore di ricerca, diversi framework e metodi in grado di affrontare le citate problematiche. Per prima cosa, dimostreremo come le preferenze possono essere usate per selezionare default rule in un programma in maniera implicita ed esplicita. In particolare proporremo: (i) un metodo per la selezione delle regole di un programma logico basato sulla specificità dell’informazione; (ii) un framework per la selezione di default rule basato sulle preferenze esplicite e sull’incertezza associata alle regole del programma. Poi, vedremo come le preferenze degli utenti possono essere modellate attraverso un programma logico, (iii) per creare il profilo dell’utente in un sistema context-aware, e (iv) per proporre un framework che supporti la definizione di preferenze complesse. Infine, per colmare le lacune in programmazione logica applicata a un processo di decisione con incertezza (v) proporremo una metodologia basata sulla programmazione logica classica e una metodologia basata su un’estensione della programmazione logica con logica possibilistica

On Graphical Modeling of Preference and Importance

In recent years, CP-nets have emerged as a useful tool for supporting preference elicitation, reasoning, and representation. CP-nets capture and support reasoning with qualitative conditional preference statements, statements that are relatively natural for users to express. In this paper, we extend the CP-nets formalism to handle another class of very natural qualitative statements one often uses in expressing preferences in daily life - statements of relative importance of attributes. The resulting formalism, TCP-nets, maintains the spirit of CP-nets, in that it remains focused on using only simple and natural preference statements, uses the ceteris paribus semantics, and utilizes a graphical representation of this information to reason about its consistency and to perform, possibly constrained, optimization using it. The extra expressiveness it provides allows us to better model tradeoffs users would like to make, more faithfully representing their preferences

On network analysis using non-additive integrals: extending the game-theoretic network centrality

There are large amounts of information that can be represented in terms of graphs. This includes social networks and internet. We can represent people and their interactions by means of graphs. Similarly, we can represent web pages (and sites) as well as links between pages by means of graphs. In order to study the properties of graphs, several indices have been defined. They include degree centrality, betweenness, and closeness. In this paper, we propose the use of Choquet and Sugeno integrals with respect to non-additive measures for network analysis. This is a natural extension of the use of game theory for network analysis. Recall that monotonic games in game theory are non-additive measures.We discuss the expected force, a centrality measure, in the light of non-additive integral network analysis. We also show that some results by Godo et al. can be used to compute network indices when the information associated with a graph is qualitative

Fitting aggregation operators to data

Theoretical advances in modelling aggregation of information produced a wide range of aggregation operators, applicable to almost every practical problem. The most important classes of aggregation operators include triangular norms, uninorms, generalised means and OWA operators.With such a variety, an important practical problem has emerged: how to fit the parameters/ weights of these families of aggregation operators to observed data? How to estimate quantitatively whether a given class of operators is suitable as a model in a given practical setting? Aggregation operators are rather special classes of functions, and thus they require specialised regression techniques, which would enforce important theoretical properties, like commutativity or associativity. My presentation will address this issue in detail, and will discuss various regression methods applicable specifically to t-norms, uninorms and generalised means. I will also demonstrate software implementing these regression techniques, which would allow practitioners to paste their data and obtain optimal parameters of the chosen family of operators.<br /