5,225 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The Global academic research organization network: Data sharing to cure diseases and enable learning health systems.
Introduction:Global data sharing is essential. This is the premise of the Academic Research Organization (ARO) Council, which was initiated in Japan in 2013 and has since been expanding throughout Asia and into Europe and the United States. The volume of data is growing exponentially, providing not only challenges but also the clear opportunity to understand and treat diseases in ways not previously considered. Harnessing the knowledge within the data in a successful way can provide researchers and clinicians with new ideas for therapies while avoiding repeats of failed experiments. This knowledge transfer from research into clinical care is at the heart of a learning health system. Methods:The ARO Council wishes to form a worldwide complementary system for the benefit of all patients and investigators, catalyzing more efficient and innovative medical research processes. Thus, they have organized Global ARO Network Workshops to bring interested parties together, focusing on the aspects necessary to make such a global effort successful. One such workshop was held in Austin, Texas, in November 2017. Representatives from Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Europe, and the United States reported on their efforts to encourage data sharing and to use research to inform care through learning health systems. Results:This experience report summarizes presentations and discussions at the Global ARO Network Workshop held in November 2017 in Austin, TX, with representatives from Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Europe, and the United States. Themes and recommendations to progress their efforts are explored. Standardization and harmonization are at the heart of these discussions to enable data sharing. In addition, the transformation of clinical research processes through disruptive innovation, while ensuring integrity and ethics, will be key to achieving the ARO Council goal to overcome diseases such that people not only live longer but also are healthier and happier as they age. Conclusions:The achievement of global learning health systems will require further exploration, consensus-building, funding aligned with incentives for data sharing, standardization, harmonization, and actions that support global interests for the benefit of patients
Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research
Electronic health records (EHRs) provide opportunities to enhance patient care, embed performance measures in clinical practice, and facilitate clinical research. Concerns have been raised about the increasing recruitment challenges in trials, burdensome and obtrusive data collection, and uncertain generalizability of the results. Leveraging electronic health records to counterbalance these trends is an area of intense interest. The initial applications of electronic health records, as the primary data source is envisioned for observational studies, embedded pragmatic or post-marketing registry-based randomized studies, or comparative effectiveness studies. Advancing this approach to randomized clinical trials, electronic health records may potentially be used to assess study feasibility, to facilitate patient recruitment, and streamline data collection at baseline and follow-up. Ensuring data security and privacy, overcoming the challenges associated with linking diverse systems and maintaining infrastructure for repeat use of high quality data, are some of the challenges associated with using electronic health records in clinical research. Collaboration between academia, industry, regulatory bodies, policy makers, patients, and electronic health record vendors is critical for the greater use of electronic health records in clinical research. This manuscript identifies the key steps required to advance the role of electronic health records in cardiovascular clinical research
Electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical research and platform trials: Application of the innovative EHR-based methods developed by EU-PEARL
Electronic health records; Platform trialsRegistros médicos electrónicos; Pruebas de plataformaRegistres mèdics electrònics; Proves de plataformaObjective
Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are digital platforms in clinical practice used to collect patients’ clinical information related to their health status and represents a useful storage of real-world data. EHRs have a potential role in research studies, in particular, in platform trials. Platform trials are innovative trial designs including multiple trial arms (conducted simultaneously and/or sequentially) on different treatments under a single master protocol. However, the use of EHRs in research comes with important challenges such as incompleteness of records and the need to translate trial eligibility criteria into interoperable queries. In this paper, we aim to review and to describe our proposed innovative methods to tackle some of the most important challenges identified. This work is part of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms (EU-PEARL) project’s work package 3 (WP3), whose objective is to deliver tools and guidance for EHR-based protocol feasibility assessment, clinical site selection, and patient pre-screening in platform trials, investing in the building of a data-driven clinical network framework that can execute these complex innovative designs for which feasibility assessments are critically important.
Methods
ISO standards and relevant references informed a readiness survey, producing 354 criteria with corresponding questions selected and harmonised through a 7-round scoring process (0–1) in stakeholder meetings, with 85% of consensus being the threshold of acceptance for a criterium/question. ATLAS cohort definition and Cohort Diagnostics were mainly used to create the trial feasibility eligibility (I/E) criteria as executable interoperable queries.
Results
The WP3/EU-PEARL group developed a readiness survey (eSurvey) for an efficient selection of clinical sites with suitable EHRs, consisting of yes-or-no questions, and a set-up of interoperable proxy queries using physicians’ defined trial criteria. Both actions facilitate recruiting trial participants and alignment between study costs/timelines and data-driven recruitment potential.
Conclusion
The eSurvey will help create an archive of clinical sites with mature EHR systems suitable to participate in clinical trials/platform trials, and the interoperable proxy queries of trial eligibility criteria will help identify the number of potential participants. Ultimately, these tools will contribute to the production of EHR-based protocol design.“EU-PEARL has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 853966-2. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA and CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION, GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR TB DRUG DEVELOPMENT NON PROFIT ORGANISATION, SPRINGWORKS THERAPEUTICS INC.
LeafAI: query generator for clinical cohort discovery rivaling a human programmer
Objective: Identifying study-eligible patients within clinical databases is a
critical step in clinical research. However, accurate query design typically
requires extensive technical and biomedical expertise. We sought to create a
system capable of generating data model-agnostic queries while also providing
novel logical reasoning capabilities for complex clinical trial eligibility
criteria.
Materials and Methods: The task of query creation from eligibility criteria
requires solving several text-processing problems, including named entity
recognition and relation extraction, sequence-to-sequence transformation,
normalization, and reasoning. We incorporated hybrid deep learning and
rule-based modules for these, as well as a knowledge base of the Unified
Medical Language System (UMLS) and linked ontologies. To enable data-model
agnostic query creation, we introduce a novel method for tagging database
schema elements using UMLS concepts. To evaluate our system, called LeafAI, we
compared the capability of LeafAI to a human database programmer to identify
patients who had been enrolled in 8 clinical trials conducted at our
institution. We measured performance by the number of actual enrolled patients
matched by generated queries.
Results: LeafAI matched a mean 43% of enrolled patients with 27,225 eligible
across 8 clinical trials, compared to 27% matched and 14,587 eligible in
queries by a human database programmer. The human programmer spent 26 total
hours crafting queries compared to several minutes by LeafAI.
Conclusions: Our work contributes a state-of-the-art data model-agnostic
query generation system capable of conditional reasoning using a knowledge
base. We demonstrate that LeafAI can rival a human programmer in finding
patients eligible for clinical trials
LLM for Patient-Trial Matching: Privacy-Aware Data Augmentation Towards Better Performance and Generalizability
The process of matching patients with suitable clinical trials is essential
for advancing medical research and providing optimal care. However, current
approaches face challenges such as data standardization, ethical
considerations, and a lack of interoperability between Electronic Health
Records (EHRs) and clinical trial criteria. In this paper, we explore the
potential of large language models (LLMs) to address these challenges by
leveraging their advanced natural language generation capabilities to improve
compatibility between EHRs and clinical trial descriptions. We propose an
innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for LLM-based patient-trial
matching (LLM-PTM), which balances the benefits of LLMs while ensuring the
security and confidentiality of sensitive patient data. Our experiments
demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed
LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
Additionally, we present case studies to further illustrate the effectiveness
of our approach and provide a deeper understanding of its underlying
principles
Synthetic Observational Health Data with GANs: from slow adoption to a boom in medical research and ultimately digital twins?
After being collected for patient care, Observational Health Data (OHD) can
further benefit patient well-being by sustaining the development of health
informatics and medical research. Vast potential is unexploited because of the
fiercely private nature of patient-related data and regulations to protect it.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have recently emerged as a
groundbreaking way to learn generative models that produce realistic synthetic
data. They have revolutionized practices in multiple domains such as
self-driving cars, fraud detection, digital twin simulations in industrial
sectors, and medical imaging.
The digital twin concept could readily apply to modelling and quantifying
disease progression. In addition, GANs posses many capabilities relevant to
common problems in healthcare: lack of data, class imbalance, rare diseases,
and preserving privacy. Unlocking open access to privacy-preserving OHD could
be transformative for scientific research. In the midst of COVID-19, the
healthcare system is facing unprecedented challenges, many of which of are data
related for the reasons stated above.
Considering these facts, publications concerning GAN applied to OHD seemed to
be severely lacking. To uncover the reasons for this slow adoption, we broadly
reviewed the published literature on the subject. Our findings show that the
properties of OHD were initially challenging for the existing GAN algorithms
(unlike medical imaging, for which state-of-the-art model were directly
transferable) and the evaluation synthetic data lacked clear metrics.
We find more publications on the subject than expected, starting slowly in
2017, and since then at an increasing rate. The difficulties of OHD remain, and
we discuss issues relating to evaluation, consistency, benchmarking, data
modelling, and reproducibility.Comment: 31 pages (10 in previous version), not including references and
glossary, 51 in total. Inclusion of a large number of recent publications and
expansion of the discussion accordingl
- …