38,351 research outputs found

    Least-squares methods for policy iteration

    Get PDF
    Approximate reinforcement learning deals with the essential problem of applying reinforcement learning in large and continuous state-action spaces, by using function approximators to represent the solution. This chapter reviews least-squares methods for policy iteration, an important class of algorithms for approximate reinforcement learning. We discuss three techniques for solving the core, policy evaluation component of policy iteration, called: least-squares temporal difference, least-squares policy evaluation, and Bellman residual minimization. We introduce these techniques starting from their general mathematical principles and detailing them down to fully specified algorithms. We pay attention to online variants of policy iteration, and provide a numerical example highlighting the behavior of representative offline and online methods. For the policy evaluation component as well as for the overall resulting approximate policy iteration, we provide guarantees on the performance obtained asymptotically, as the number of samples processed and iterations executed grows to infinity. We also provide finite-sample results, which apply when a finite number of samples and iterations are considered. Finally, we outline several extensions and improvements to the techniques and methods reviewed

    Approximate policy iteration: A survey and some new methods

    Get PDF
    We consider the classical policy iteration method of dynamic programming (DP), where approximations and simulation are used to deal with the curse of dimensionality. We survey a number of issues: convergence and rate of convergence of approximate policy evaluation methods, singularity and susceptibility to simulation noise of policy evaluation, exploration issues, constrained and enhanced policy iteration, policy oscillation and chattering, and optimistic and distributed policy iteration. Our discussion of policy evaluation is couched in general terms and aims to unify the available methods in the light of recent research developments and to compare the two main policy evaluation approaches: projected equations and temporal differences (TD), and aggregation. In the context of these approaches, we survey two different types of simulation-based algorithms: matrix inversion methods, such as least-squares temporal difference (LSTD), and iterative methods, such as least-squares policy evaluation (LSPE) and TD (λ), and their scaled variants. We discuss a recent method, based on regression and regularization, which rectifies the unreliability of LSTD for nearly singular projected Bellman equations. An iterative version of this method belongs to the LSPE class of methods and provides the connecting link between LSTD and LSPE. Our discussion of policy improvement focuses on the role of policy oscillation and its effect on performance guarantees. We illustrate that policy evaluation when done by the projected equation/TD approach may lead to policy oscillation, but when done by aggregation it does not. This implies better error bounds and more regular performance for aggregation, at the expense of some loss of generality in cost function representation capability. Hard aggregation provides the connecting link between projected equation/TD-based and aggregation-based policy evaluation, and is characterized by favorable error bounds.National Science Foundation (U.S.) (No.ECCS-0801549)Los Alamos National Laboratory. Information Science and Technology InstituteUnited States. Air Force (No.FA9550-10-1-0412

    Kernelizing LSPE λ

    Get PDF
    We propose the use of kernel-based methods as underlying function approximator in the least-squares based policy evaluation framework of LSPE(λ) and LSTD(λ). In particular we present the ‘kernelization’ of model-free LSPE(λ). The ‘kernelization’ is computationally made possible by using the subset of regressors approximation, which approximates the kernel using a vastly reduced number of basis functions. The core of our proposed solution is an efficient recursive implementation with automatic supervised selection of the relevant basis functions. The LSPE method is well-suited for optimistic policy iteration and can thus be used in the context of online reinforcement learning. We use the high-dimensional Octopus benchmark to demonstrate this

    Data-Driven Control of Unknown Systems: A Linear Programming Approach

    Full text link
    We consider the problem of discounted optimal state-feedback regulation for general unknown deterministic discrete-time systems. It is well known that open-loop instability of systems, non-quadratic cost functions and complex nonlinear dynamics, as well as the on-policy behavior of many reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, make the design of model-free optimal adaptive controllers a challenging task. We depart from commonly used least-squares and neural network approximation methods in conventional model-free control theory, and propose a novel family of data-driven optimization algorithms based on linear programming, off-policy Q-learning and randomized experience replay. We develop both policy iteration (PI) and value iteration (VI) methods to compute an approximate optimal feedback controller with high precision and without the knowledge of a system model and stage cost function. Simulation studies confirm the effectiveness of the proposed methods

    Reinforcement Learning with Partial Parametric Model Knowledge

    Full text link
    We adapt reinforcement learning (RL) methods for continuous control to bridge the gap between complete ignorance and perfect knowledge of the environment. Our method, Partial Knowledge Least Squares Policy Iteration (PLSPI), takes inspiration from both model-free RL and model-based control. It uses incomplete information from a partial model and retains RL's data-driven adaption towards optimal performance. The linear quadratic regulator provides a case study; numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and resulting benefits of the proposed method.Comment: IFAC World Congress 202

    Modelling transition dynamics in MDPs with RKHS embeddings

    Full text link
    We propose a new, nonparametric approach to learning and representing transition dynamics in Markov decision processes (MDPs), which can be combined easily with dynamic programming methods for policy optimisation and value estimation. This approach makes use of a recently developed representation of conditional distributions as \emph{embeddings} in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). Such representations bypass the need for estimating transition probabilities or densities, and apply to any domain on which kernels can be defined. This avoids the need to calculate intractable integrals, since expectations are represented as RKHS inner products whose computation has linear complexity in the number of points used to represent the embedding. We provide guarantees for the proposed applications in MDPs: in the context of a value iteration algorithm, we prove convergence to either the optimal policy, or to the closest projection of the optimal policy in our model class (an RKHS), under reasonable assumptions. In experiments, we investigate a learning task in a typical classical control setting (the under-actuated pendulum), and on a navigation problem where only images from a sensor are observed. For policy optimisation we compare with least-squares policy iteration where a Gaussian process is used for value function estimation. For value estimation we also compare to the NPDP method. Our approach achieves better performance in all experiments.Comment: ICML201

    Representation Policy Iteration

    Full text link
    This paper addresses a fundamental issue central to approximation methods for solving large Markov decision processes (MDPs): how to automatically learn the underlying representation for value function approximation? A novel theoretically rigorous framework is proposed that automatically generates geometrically customized orthonormal sets of basis functions, which can be used with any approximate MDP solver like least squares policy iteration (LSPI). The key innovation is a coordinate-free representation of value functions, using the theory of smooth functions on a Riemannian manifold. Hodge theory yields a constructive method for generating basis functions for approximating value functions based on the eigenfunctions of the self-adjoint (Laplace-Beltrami) operator on manifolds. In effect, this approach performs a global Fourier analysis on the state space graph to approximate value functions, where the basis functions reflect the largescale topology of the underlying state space. A new class of algorithms called Representation Policy Iteration (RPI) are presented that automatically learn both basis functions and approximately optimal policies. Illustrative experiments compare the performance of RPI with that of LSPI using two handcoded basis functions (RBF and polynomial state encodings).Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2005

    Vision-based reinforcement learning using approximate policy iteration

    Get PDF
    A major issue for reinforcement learning (RL) applied to robotics is the time required to learn a new skill. While RL has been used to learn mobile robot control in many simulated domains, applications involving learning on real robots are still relatively rare. In this paper, the Least-Squares Policy Iteration (LSPI) reinforcement learning algorithm and a new model-based algorithm Least-Squares Policy Iteration with Prioritized Sweeping (LSPI+), are implemented on a mobile robot to acquire new skills quickly and efficiently. LSPI+ combines the benefits of LSPI and prioritized sweeping, which uses all previous experience to focus the computational effort on the most “interesting” or dynamic parts of the state space. The proposed algorithms are tested on a household vacuum cleaner robot for learning a docking task using vision as the only sensor modality. In experiments these algorithms are compared to other model-based and model-free RL algorithms. The results show that the number of trials required to learn the docking task is significantly reduced using LSPI compared to the other RL algorithms investigated, and that LSPI+ further improves on the performance of LSPI
    corecore