1,419 research outputs found
Intent Models for Contextualising and Diversifying Query Suggestions
The query suggestion or auto-completion mechanisms help users to type less
while interacting with a search engine. A basic approach that ranks suggestions
according to their frequency in the query logs is suboptimal. Firstly, many
candidate queries with the same prefix can be removed as redundant. Secondly,
the suggestions can also be personalised based on the user's context. These two
directions to improve the aforementioned mechanisms' quality can be in
opposition: while the latter aims to promote suggestions that address search
intents that a user is likely to have, the former aims to diversify the
suggestions to cover as many intents as possible. We introduce a
contextualisation framework that utilises a short-term context using the user's
behaviour within the current search session, such as the previous query, the
documents examined, and the candidate query suggestions that the user has
discarded. This short-term context is used to contextualise and diversify the
ranking of query suggestions, by modelling the user's information need as a
mixture of intent-specific user models. The evaluation is performed offline on
a set of approximately 1.0M test user sessions. Our results suggest that the
proposed approach significantly improves query suggestions compared to the
baseline approach.Comment: A short version of this paper was presented at CIKM 201
DCU-TCD@LogCLEF 2010: re-ranking document collections and query performance estimation
This paper describes the collaborative participation of Dublin City University and Trinity College Dublin in LogCLEF 2010. Two sets of experiments were conducted. First, different aspects of the TEL query logs were analysed after extracting user sessions of consecutive queries on a topic. The relation between the queries and their length (number of terms) and position (first query or further reformulations) was examined in a session with respect to query performance estimators such as query
scope, IDF-based measures, simplified query clarity score, and average inverse document collection frequency. Results of this analysis suggest that only some estimator values show a correlation with query length or position in the TEL logs (e.g. similarity score between collection and query). Second, the relation between three attributes was investigated: the user's country (detected from IP address), the query language, and the interface language. The investigation aimed to explore the influence of the three attributes on the user's collection selection. Moreover, the investigation involved assigning different weights to the three attributes in a scoring function that was used to re-rank the collections displayed to the user according to the language and country. The results of the
collection re-ranking show a significant improvement in Mean Average Precision (MAP) over the original collection ranking of TEL. The results also indicate that the query language and interface language have more in
uence than the user's country on the collections selected by the users
Query Chains: Learning to Rank from Implicit Feedback
This paper presents a novel approach for using clickthrough data to learn
ranked retrieval functions for web search results. We observe that users
searching the web often perform a sequence, or chain, of queries with a similar
information need. Using query chains, we generate new types of preference
judgments from search engine logs, thus taking advantage of user intelligence
in reformulating queries. To validate our method we perform a controlled user
study comparing generated preference judgments to explicit relevance judgments.
We also implemented a real-world search engine to test our approach, using a
modified ranking SVM to learn an improved ranking function from preference
data. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in the ranking given by
the search engine. The learned rankings outperform both a static ranking
function, as well as one trained without considering query chains.Comment: 10 page
Efficient Diversification of Web Search Results
In this paper we analyze the efficiency of various search results
diversification methods. While efficacy of diversification approaches has been
deeply investigated in the past, response time and scalability issues have been
rarely addressed. A unified framework for studying performance and feasibility
of result diversification solutions is thus proposed. First we define a new
methodology for detecting when, and how, query results need to be diversified.
To this purpose, we rely on the concept of "query refinement" to estimate the
probability of a query to be ambiguous. Then, relying on this novel ambiguity
detection method, we deploy and compare on a standard test set, three different
diversification methods: IASelect, xQuAD, and OptSelect. While the first two
are recent state-of-the-art proposals, the latter is an original algorithm
introduced in this paper. We evaluate both the efficiency and the effectiveness
of our approach against its competitors by using the standard TREC Web
diversification track testbed. Results shown that OptSelect is able to run two
orders of magnitude faster than the two other state-of-the-art approaches and
to obtain comparable figures in diversification effectiveness.Comment: VLDB201
- …