Learning to Attend, Copy, and Generate for Session-Based Query Suggestion

Users try to articulate their complex information needs during search sessions by reformulating their queries. To make this process more effective, search engines provide related queries to help users in specifying the information need in their search process. In this paper, we propose a customized sequence-to-sequence model for session-based query suggestion. In our model, we employ a query-aware attention mechanism to capture the structure of the session context. is enables us to control the scope of the session from which we infer the suggested next query, which helps not only handle the noisy data but also automatically detect session boundaries. Furthermore, we observe that, based on the user query reformulation behavior, within a single session a large portion of query terms is retained from the previously submitted queries and consists of mostly infrequent or unseen terms that are usually not included in the vocabulary. We therefore empower the decoder of our model to access the source words from the session context during decoding by incorporating a copy mechanism. Moreover, we propose evaluation metrics to assess the quality of the generative models for query suggestion. We conduct an extensive set of experiments and analysis. e results suggest that our model outperforms the baselines both in terms of the generating queries and scoring candidate queries for the task of query suggestion.Comment: Accepted to be published at The 26th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM2017

Learning to Diversify Web Search Results with a Document Repulsion Model

Search diversification (also called diversity search), is an important approach to tackling the query ambiguity problem in information retrieval. It aims to diversify the search results that are originally ranked according to their probabilities of relevance to a given query, by re-ranking them to cover as many as possible different aspects (or subtopics) of the query. Most existing diversity search models heuristically balance the relevance ranking and the diversity ranking, yet lacking an efficient learning mechanism to reach an optimized parameter setting. To address this problem, we propose a learning-to-diversify approach which can directly optimize the search diversification performance (in term of any effectiveness metric). We first extend the ranking function of a widely used learning-to-rank framework, i.e., LambdaMART, so that the extended ranking function can correlate relevance and diversity indicators. Furthermore, we develop an effective learning algorithm, namely Document Repulsion Model (DRM), to train the ranking function based on a Document Repulsion Theory (DRT). DRT assumes that two result documents covering similar query aspects (i.e., subtopics) should be mutually repulsive, for the purpose of search diversification. Accordingly, the proposed DRM exerts a repulsion force between each pair of similar documents in the learning process, and includes the diversity effectiveness metric to be optimized as part of the loss function. Although there have been existing learning based diversity search methods, they often involve an iterative sequential selection process in the ranking process, which is computationally complex and time consuming for training, while our proposed learning strategy can largely reduce the time cost. Extensive experiments are conducted on the TREC diversity track data (2009, 2010 and 2011). The results demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms a number of baselines in terms of effectiveness and robustness. Further, an efficiency analysis shows that the proposed DRM has a lower computational complexity than the state of the art learning-to-diversify methods

Searching and Stopping: An Analysis of Stopping Rules and Strategies

Searching naturally involves stopping points, both at a query level (how far down the ranked list should I go?) and at a session level (how many queries should I issue?). Understanding when searchers stop has been of much interest to the community because it is fundamental to how we evaluate search behaviour and performance. Research has shown that searchers find it difficult to formalise stopping criteria, and typically resort to their intuition of what is "good enough". While various heuristics and stopping criteria have been proposed, little work has investigated how well they perform, and whether searchers actually conform to any of these rules. In this paper, we undertake the first large scale study of stopping rules, investigating how they influence overall session performance, and which rules best match actual stopping behaviour. Our work is focused on stopping at the query level in the context of ad-hoc topic retrieval, where searchers undertake search tasks within a fixed time period. We show that stopping strategies based upon the disgust or frustration point rules - both of which capture a searcher's tolerance to non-relevance - typically result in (i) the best overall performance, and (ii) provide the closest approximation to actual searcher behaviour, although a fixed depth approach also performs remarkably well. Findings from this study have implications regarding how we build measures, and how we conduct simulations of search behaviours