Differentiation among bio- and augmented- feedback in technologically assisted rehabilitation

Introduction: In rehabilitation practice, the term ‘feedback’ is often improperly used, with augmented feedback and biofeedback frequently confused, especially when referring to the human-machine interaction during technologically assisted training. The absence of a clear differentiation between these categories represents an unmet need for rehabilitation, emphasized by the advent of new technologies making extensive use of video feedback, exergame, and virtual reality. Area covered: In this review we tried to present scientific knowledge about feedback, biofeedback, augmented feedback and neurofeedback, and related differences in rehabilitation settings, for a more proper use of this terminology. Despite the continuous expansion of the field, few researches clarify the differences among these terms. This scoping review was conducted through the searching of current literature up to May 2020, using following databases: PUBMED, EMBASE and Web of Science. After literature search a classification system, distinguishing feedback, augmented feedback, and biofeedback, was applied. Expert opinion: There is a need for clear definitions of feedback, biofeedback, augmented feedback, and neurofeedback in rehabilitation, especially in the technologically assisted one based on human-machine interaction. In fact, the fast development of new technologies requires to be based on solid concepts and on a common terminology shared among bioengineers and clinicians

Evidence for early physiotherapy after acute stroke: a scoping review

Neuroscience evidence indicates that early rehabilitation can guarantee better outcomes and quicker cortical re-organization after lesion. Although there are some studies related to the acute stroke physiotherapy intervention, it seems that few consider the evidence that link neuroplasticity and neurorehabilitation. Therefore, understanding the current state of the art of physiotherapy intervention is vital to potentialize the intervention so the enhance neuroplastic window is properly explored. To analyze the physiotherapy's intervention on acute stroke patients, so it reveals the underlined evidence for the selection of the approach and if the neurophysiological mechanisms are associated. This scoping review's methodology follows the Joanna Briggs Institue. A main search was conducted across Pubmed, PEdro and Web of science in December 2020, including only studies in Portuguese or English. Studies included focused on the concept of physiotherapy's intervention in a population of adult acute stroke patients, in an acute care context. Were identified 14 categories of interventions in 37 studies. 62% of studies didn't give any justification for the choic of method and the ones who did, weren't focused on neurophysiological knowledge. A wide range of interventions was found in which only 38% showed justifications that were considered insufficient and imprecise

Down-Conditioning of Soleus Reflex Activity using Mechanical Stimuli and EMG Biofeedback

Spasticity is a common syndrome caused by various brain and neural injuries, which can severely impair walking ability and functional independence. To improve functional independence, conditioning protocols are available aimed at reducing spasticity by facilitating spinal neuroplasticity. This down-conditioning can be performed using different types of stimuli, electrical or mechanical, and reflex activity measures, EMG or impedance, used as biofeedback variable. Still, current results on effectiveness of these conditioning protocols are incomplete, making comparisons difficult. We aimed to show the within-session task- dependent and across-session long-term adaptation of a conditioning protocol based on mechanical stimuli and EMG biofeedback. However, in contrast to literature, preliminary results show that subjects were unable to successfully obtain task-dependent modulation of their soleus short-latency stretch reflex magnitude

Usability evaluation of an interactive leg press training robot for children with neuromuscular impairments.

BACKGROUND The use of robotic technology for neurorehabilitative applications has become increasingly important for adults and children with different motor impairments. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and usability of a new interactive leg-press training robot that was developed to train leg muscle strength and control, suitable for children with neuromuscular impairments. METHODS An interactive robotic training system was designed and constructed with various control strategies, actuators and force/position sensors to enable the performance of different training modes (passive, active resistance, and exergames). Five paediatric patients, aged between 7 and 16 years (one girl, age 13.0 ± 3.7 years, [mean ± SD]), with different neuromuscular impairments were recruited to participate in this study. Patients evaluated the device based on a user satisfaction questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and therapists evaluated the device with the modified System Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS One patient could not perform the training session because of his small knee range of motion. Visual Analog Scale scores were given by the 4 patients who performed the training sessions. All the patients adjudged the training with the interactive device as satisfactory. The average SUS score given by the therapists was 61.2 ± 18.4. CONCLUSION This study proposed an interactive lower limb training device for children with different neuromuscular impairments. The device is deemed feasible for paediatric rehabilitation applications, both in terms of technical feasibility and usability acceptance. Both patients and therapists provided positive feedback regarding the training with the device