11,016 research outputs found
Partner Selection for the Emergence of Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems Using Reinforcement Learning
Social dilemmas have been widely studied to explain how humans are able to
cooperate in society. Considerable effort has been invested in designing
artificial agents for social dilemmas that incorporate explicit agent
motivations that are chosen to favor coordinated or cooperative responses. The
prevalence of this general approach points towards the importance of achieving
an understanding of both an agent's internal design and external environment
dynamics that facilitate cooperative behavior. In this paper, we investigate
how partner selection can promote cooperative behavior between agents who are
trained to maximize a purely selfish objective function. Our experiments reveal
that agents trained with this dynamic learn a strategy that retaliates against
defectors while promoting cooperation with other agents resulting in a
prosocial society.Comment:
Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation
Recent research has identified interactions between networks as crucial for the outcome of evolutionary
games taking place on them. While the consensus is that interdependence does promote cooperation by
means of organizational complexity and enhanced reciprocity that is out of reach on isolated networks, we
here address the question just how much interdependence there should be. Intuitively, one might assume
the more the better. However, we show that in fact only an intermediate density of sufficiently strong
interactions between networks warrants an optimal resolution of social dilemmas. This is due to an intricate
interplay between the heterogeneity that causes an asymmetric strategy flow because of the additional links
between the networks, and the independent formation of cooperative patterns on each individual network.
Presented results are robust to variations of the strategy updating rule, the topology of interdependent
networks, and the governing social dilemma, thus suggesting a high degree of universality
Coevolutionary games - a mini review
Prevalence of cooperation within groups of selfish individuals is puzzling in
that it contradicts with the basic premise of natural selection. Favoring
players with higher fitness, the latter is key for understanding the challenges
faced by cooperators when competing with defectors. Evolutionary game theory
provides a competent theoretical framework for addressing the subtleties of
cooperation in such situations, which are known as social dilemmas. Recent
advances point towards the fact that the evolution of strategies alone may be
insufficient to fully exploit the benefits offered by cooperative behavior.
Indeed, while spatial structure and heterogeneity, for example, have been
recognized as potent promoters of cooperation, coevolutionary rules can extend
the potentials of such entities further, and even more importantly, lead to the
understanding of their emergence. The introduction of coevolutionary rules to
evolutionary games implies, that besides the evolution of strategies, another
property may simultaneously be subject to evolution as well. Coevolutionary
rules may affect the interaction network, the reproduction capability of
players, their reputation, mobility or age. Here we review recent works on
evolutionary games incorporating coevolutionary rules, as well as give a
didactic description of potential pitfalls and misconceptions associated with
the subject. In addition, we briefly outline directions for future research
that we feel are promising, thereby particularly focusing on dynamical effects
of coevolutionary rules on the evolution of cooperation, which are still widely
open to research and thus hold promise of exciting new discoveries.Comment: 24 two-column pages, 10 figures; accepted for publication in
BioSystem
Simple and Complex Gift Exchange in the Laboratory
We examine an experimental gift exchange game in which the players can improve upon the unique no-gifts equilibrium through cooperative gift giving. The main feature of the study is that there are two different types of gift exchange, which we call simple and complex exchange, respectively. Complex exchange gives higher payoffs than simple exchange but it requires not only mutual trust, like simple exchange, but also a substantial degree of coordination. We examine whether players are able to conclude simple and complex exchanges and how this is affected by the move and matching structure of the game.experiments;reciprocity;trust;coordination;gift exchange
Beyond pairwise strategy updating in the prisoner's dilemma game
In spatial games players typically alter their strategy by imitating the most
successful or one randomly selected neighbor. Since a single neighbor is taken
as reference, the information stemming from other neighbors is neglected, which
begets the consideration of alternative, possibly more realistic approaches.
Here we show that strategy changes inspired not only by the performance of
individual neighbors but rather by entire neighborhoods introduce a
qualitatively different evolutionary dynamics that is able to support the
stable existence of very small cooperative clusters. This leads to phase
diagrams that differ significantly from those obtained by means of pairwise
strategy updating. In particular, the survivability of cooperators is possible
even by high temptations to defect and over a much wider uncertainty range. We
support the simulation results by means of pair approximations and analysis of
spatial patterns, which jointly highlight the importance of local information
for the resolution of social dilemmas.Comment: 9 two-column pages, 5 figures; accepted for publication in Scientific
Report
Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas
The pursuit of highest payoffs in evolutionary social dilemmas is risky and
sometimes inferior to conformity. Choosing the most common strategy within the
interaction range is safer because it ensures that the payoff of an individual
will not be much lower than average. Herding instincts and crowd behavior in
humans and social animals also compel to conformity on their own right.
Motivated by these facts, we here study the impact of conformity on the
evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas. We show that an appropriate
fraction of conformists within the population introduces an effective surface
tension around cooperative clusters and ensures smooth interfaces between
different strategy domains. Payoff-driven players brake the symmetry in favor
of cooperation and enable an expansion of clusters past the boundaries imposed
by traditional network reciprocity. This mechanism works even under the most
testing conditions, and it is robust against variations of the interaction
network as long as degree-normalized payoffs are applied. Conformity may thus
be beneficial for the resolution of social dilemmas.Comment: 8 two-column pages, 5 figures; accepted for publication in Journal of
the Royal Society Interfac
- …