909 research outputs found

    Learning Ordinal Preferences on Multiattribute Domains: the Case of CP-nets

    Get PDF
    International audienceA recurrent issue in decision making is to extract a preference structure by observing the user's behavior in different situations. In this paper, we investigate the problem of learning ordinal preference orderings over discrete multi-attribute, or combinatorial, domains. Specifically, we focus on the learnability issue of conditional preference networks, or CP- nets, that have recently emerged as a popular graphical language for representing ordinal preferences in a concise and intuitive manner. This paper provides results in both passive and active learning. In the passive setting, the learner aims at finding a CP-net compatible with a supplied set of examples, while in the active setting the learner searches for the cheapest interaction policy with the user for acquiring the target CP-net

    Archives of Data Science, Series A. Vol. 1,1: Special Issue: Selected Papers of the 3rd German-Polish Symposium on Data Analysis and Applications

    Get PDF
    The first volume of Archives of Data Science, Series A is a special issue of a selection of contributions which have been originally presented at the {\em 3rd Bilateral German-Polish Symposium on Data Analysis and Its Applications} (GPSDAA 2013). All selected papers fit into the emerging field of data science consisting of the mathematical sciences (computer science, mathematics, operations research, and statistics) and an application domain (e.g. marketing, biology, economics, engineering)

    History-Dependent Risk Attitude

    Get PDF

    Structuring the decision process : an evaluation of methods in the structuring the decision process

    Get PDF
    This chapter examines the effectiveness of methods that are designed to provide structure and support to decision making. Those that are primarily aimed at individual decision makers are examined first and then attention is turned to groups. In each case weaknesses of unaided decision making are identified and how successful the application of formal methods is likely to be in mitigating these weaknesses is assessed

    The complexity of unsupervised learning of lexicographic preferences

    Get PDF
    International audienceThis paper considers the task of learning users' preferences on a combinatorial set of alternatives, as generally used by online configurators, for example. In many settings, only a set of selected alternatives during past interactions is available to the learner. Fargier et al. [2018] propose an approach to learn, in such a setting, a model of the users' preferences that ranks previously chosen alternatives as high as possible; and an algorithm to learn, in this setting, a particular model of preferences: lexicographic preferences trees (LP-trees). In this paper, we study complexity-theoretical problems related to this approach. We give an upper bound on the sample complexity of learning an LP-tree, which is logarithmic in the number of attributes. We also prove that computing the LP tree that minimises the empirical risk can be done in polynomial time when restricted to the class of linear LP-trees

    Satisficing: Integrating two traditions

    Get PDF

    Learning From Small Samples: An Analysis of Simple Decision Heuristics

    Get PDF
    Abstract Simple decision heuristics are models of human and animal behavior that use few pieces of information-perhaps only a single piece of information-and integrate the pieces in simple ways, for example, by considering them sequentially, one at a time, or by giving them equal weight. We focus on three families of heuristics: single-cue decision making, lexicographic decision making, and tallying. It is unknown how quickly these heuristics can be learned from experience. We show, analytically and empirically, that substantial progress in learning can be made with just a few training samples. When training samples are very few, tallying performs substantially better than the alternative methods tested. Our empirical analysis is the most extensive to date, employing 63 natural data sets on diverse subjects
    corecore