3,708 research outputs found
OOGAN: Disentangling GAN with One-Hot Sampling and Orthogonal Regularization
Exploring the potential of GANs for unsupervised disentanglement learning,
this paper proposes a novel GAN-based disentanglement framework with One-Hot
Sampling and Orthogonal Regularization (OOGAN). While previous works mostly
attempt to tackle disentanglement learning through VAE and seek to implicitly
minimize the Total Correlation (TC) objective with various sorts of
approximation methods, we show that GANs have a natural advantage in
disentangling with an alternating latent variable (noise) sampling method that
is straightforward and robust. Furthermore, we provide a brand-new perspective
on designing the structure of the generator and discriminator, demonstrating
that a minor structural change and an orthogonal regularization on model
weights entails an improved disentanglement. Instead of experimenting on simple
toy datasets, we conduct experiments on higher-resolution images and show that
OOGAN greatly pushes the boundary of unsupervised disentanglement.Comment: AAAI 202
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) is a novel class of deep generative
models which has recently gained significant attention. GANs learns complex and
high-dimensional distributions implicitly over images, audio, and data.
However, there exists major challenges in training of GANs, i.e., mode
collapse, non-convergence and instability, due to inappropriate design of
network architecture, use of objective function and selection of optimization
algorithm. Recently, to address these challenges, several solutions for better
design and optimization of GANs have been investigated based on techniques of
re-engineered network architectures, new objective functions and alternative
optimization algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing
survey that has particularly focused on broad and systematic developments of
these solutions. In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of the
advancements in GANs design and optimization solutions proposed to handle GANs
challenges. We first identify key research issues within each design and
optimization technique and then propose a new taxonomy to structure solutions
by key research issues. In accordance with the taxonomy, we provide a detailed
discussion on different GANs variants proposed within each solution and their
relationships. Finally, based on the insights gained, we present the promising
research directions in this rapidly growing field.Comment: 42 pages, Figure 13, Table
Input Prioritization for Testing Neural Networks
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly being adopted for sensing and
control functions in a variety of safety and mission-critical systems such as
self-driving cars, autonomous air vehicles, medical diagnostics, and industrial
robotics. Failures of such systems can lead to loss of life or property, which
necessitates stringent verification and validation for providing high
assurance. Though formal verification approaches are being investigated,
testing remains the primary technique for assessing the dependability of such
systems. Due to the nature of the tasks handled by DNNs, the cost of obtaining
test oracle data---the expected output, a.k.a. label, for a given input---is
high, which significantly impacts the amount and quality of testing that can be
performed. Thus, prioritizing input data for testing DNNs in meaningful ways to
reduce the cost of labeling can go a long way in increasing testing efficacy.
This paper proposes using gauges of the DNN's sentiment derived from the
computation performed by the model, as a means to identify inputs that are
likely to reveal weaknesses. We empirically assessed the efficacy of three such
sentiment measures for prioritization---confidence, uncertainty, and
surprise---and compare their effectiveness in terms of their fault-revealing
capability and retraining effectiveness. The results indicate that sentiment
measures can effectively flag inputs that expose unacceptable DNN behavior. For
MNIST models, the average percentage of inputs correctly flagged ranged from
88% to 94.8%
- …