Timing models for high-level synthesis

In this paper, we describe a timing model for clock estimation during high-level synthesis. In order to obtain realistic timing estimates, the proposed model considers all delay elements, including datapath, control and wire delays, and several technology factors, such as layout architecture, technology mapping, buffers insertion and loading effects. The experimental results show that this model can provide much better estimates than previous models. This model is well suited for automatic and interactive synthesis as well as feedback-driven synthesis where performance matrices must be rapidly and incrementally calculated

Cycle time optimization by timing driven placement with simultaneous netlist transformations

We present new concepts to integrate logic synthesis and physical design. Our methodology uses general Boolean transformations as known from technology-independent synthesis, and a recursive bi-partitioning placement algorithm. In each partitioning step, the precision of the layout data increases. This allows effective guidance of the logic synthesis operations for cycle time optimization. An additional advantage of our approach is that no complicated layout corrections are needed when the netlist is changed

Back-annotation for interactive data path synthesis

In order to take into account physical design effects, a designer needs a feedback mechanism during interactive data path synthesis. In this paper, we propose a hypergraph model and a back-annotation algorithm which provide a feedback mechanism for back-annotation from physical designs to behavioral descriptions. Given a control data flow graph and its structural design, this back-annotation technique cannot only evaluate the design quality but can also feedback the delay to each edge and node in the graph. Therefore, a designer can identify the critical paths and improve the design. The hypergraph model and the back-annotation algorithm allow us to bridge the gap between the behavioral description and the physical design

On the suitability and development of layout templates for analog layout reuse and layout-aware synthesis

Accelerating the synthesis of increasingly complex analog integrated circuits is key to bridge the widening gap between what we can integrate and what we can design while meeting ever-tightening time-to-market constraints. It is a well-known fact in the semiconductor industry that such goal can only be attained by means of adequate CAD methodologies, techniques, and accompanying tools. This is particularly important in analog physical synthesis (a.k.a. layout generation), where large sensitivities of the circuit performances to the many subtle details of layout implementation (device matching, loading and coupling effects, reliability, and area features are of utmost importance to analog designers), render complete automation a truly challenging task. To approach the problem, two directions have been traditionally considered, knowledge-based and optimization-based, both with their own pros and cons. Besides, recently reported solutions oriented to speed up the overall design flow by means of reuse-based practices or by cutting off time-consuming, error-prone spins between electrical and layout synthesis (a technique known as layout-aware synthesis), rely on a outstandingly rapid yet efficient layout generation method. This paper analyses the suitability of procedural layout generation based on templates (a knowledge-based approach) by examining the requirements that both layout reuse and layout-aware solutions impose, and how layout templates face them. The ability to capture the know-how of experienced layout designers and the turnaround times for layout instancing are considered main comparative aspects in relation to other layout generation approaches. A discussion on the benefit-cost trade-off of using layout templates is also included. In addition to this analysis, the paper delves deeper into systematic techniques to develop fully reusable layout templates for analog circuits, either for a change of the circuit sizing (i.e., layout retargeting) or a change of the fabrication process (i.e., layout migration). Several examples implemented with the Cadence's Virtuoso tool suite are provided as demonstration of the paper's contributions.Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia TEC2004-0175