24,569 research outputs found
Superdevelopments for Weak Reduction
We study superdevelopments in the weak lambda calculus of Cagman and Hindley,
a confluent variant of the standard weak lambda calculus in which reduction
below lambdas is forbidden. In contrast to developments, a superdevelopment
from a term M allows not only residuals of redexes in M to be reduced but also
some newly created ones. In the lambda calculus there are three ways new
redexes may be created; in the weak lambda calculus a new form of redex
creation is possible. We present labeled and simultaneous reduction
formulations of superdevelopments for the weak lambda calculus and prove them
equivalent
Relational Parametricity and Control
We study the equational theory of Parigot's second-order
λμ-calculus in connection with a call-by-name continuation-passing
style (CPS) translation into a fragment of the second-order λ-calculus.
It is observed that the relational parametricity on the target calculus induces
a natural notion of equivalence on the λμ-terms. On the other hand,
the unconstrained relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus turns
out to be inconsistent with this CPS semantics. Following these facts, we
propose to formulate the relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus
in a constrained way, which might be called ``focal parametricity''.Comment: 22 pages, for Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Completeness of algebraic CPS simulations
The algebraic lambda calculus and the linear algebraic lambda calculus are
two extensions of the classical lambda calculus with linear combinations of
terms. They arise independently in distinct contexts: the former is a fragment
of the differential lambda calculus, the latter is a candidate lambda calculus
for quantum computation. They differ in the handling of application arguments
and algebraic rules. The two languages can simulate each other using an
algebraic extension of the well-known call-by-value and call-by-name CPS
translations. These simulations are sound, in that they preserve reductions. In
this paper, we prove that the simulations are actually complete, strengthening
the connection between the two languages.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2011, arXiv:1207.682
Trees from Functions as Processes
Levy-Longo Trees and Bohm Trees are the best known tree structures on the
{\lambda}-calculus. We give general conditions under which an encoding of the
{\lambda}-calculus into the {\pi}-calculus is sound and complete with respect
to such trees. We apply these conditions to various encodings of the
call-by-name {\lambda}-calculus, showing how the two kinds of tree can be
obtained by varying the behavioural equivalence adopted in the {\pi}-calculus
and/or the encoding
Full Abstraction for the Resource Lambda Calculus with Tests, through Taylor Expansion
We study the semantics of a resource-sensitive extension of the lambda
calculus in a canonical reflexive object of a category of sets and relations, a
relational version of Scott's original model of the pure lambda calculus. This
calculus is related to Boudol's resource calculus and is derived from Ehrhard
and Regnier's differential extension of Linear Logic and of the lambda
calculus. We extend it with new constructions, to be understood as implementing
a very simple exception mechanism, and with a "must" parallel composition.
These new operations allow to associate a context of this calculus with any
point of the model and to prove full abstraction for the finite sub-calculus
where ordinary lambda calculus application is not allowed. The result is then
extended to the full calculus by means of a Taylor Expansion formula. As an
intermediate result we prove that the exception mechanism is not essential in
the finite sub-calculus
Correctness of copy in calculi with letrec, case, constructors and por
This paper extends the internal frank report 28 as follows: It is shown that for a call-by-need lambda calculus LRCCP-Lambda extending the calculus LRCC-Lambda by por, i.e in a lambda-calculus with letrec, case, constructors, seq and por, copying can be done without restrictions, and also that call-by-need and call-by-name strategies are equivalent w.r.t. contextual equivalence
Linear-algebraic lambda-calculus
With a view towards models of quantum computation and/or the interpretation
of linear logic, we define a functional language where all functions are linear
operators by construction. A small step operational semantic (and hence an
interpreter/simulator) is provided for this language in the form of a term
rewrite system. The linear-algebraic lambda-calculus hereby constructed is
linear in a different (yet related) sense to that, say, of the linear
lambda-calculus. These various notions of linearity are discussed in the
context of quantum programming languages. KEYWORDS: quantum lambda-calculus,
linear lambda-calculus, -calculus, quantum logics.Comment: LaTeX, 23 pages, 10 figures and the LINEAL language
interpreter/simulator file (see "other formats"). See the more recent
arXiv:quant-ph/061219
- …