LYRA, a webserver for lymphocyte receptor structural modeling.

The accurate structural modeling of B- and T-cell receptors is fundamental to gain a detailed insight in the mechanisms underlying immunity and in de-veloping new drugs and therapies. The LYRA (LYm-phocyte Receptor Automated modeling) web serve

Evaluation of Structural Flexibility and Cross-Reactivity of the T-Cell Receptor

https://openworks.mdanderson.org/sumexp23/1112/thumbnail.jp

TCRpMHCmodels: Structural modelling of TCR-pMHC class I complexes

The interaction between the class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC), the peptide presented by the MHC and the T-cell receptor (TCR) is a key determinant of the cellular immune response. Here, we present TCRpMHCmodels, a method for accurate structural modelling of the TCR-peptide-MHC (TCR-pMHC) complex. This TCR-pMHC modelling pipeline takes as input the amino acid sequence and generates models of the TCR-pMHC complex, with a median Cα RMSD of 2.31 Å. TCRpMHCmodels significantly outperforms TCRFlexDock, a specialised method for docking pMHC and TCR structures. TCRpMHCmodels is simple to use and the modelling pipeline takes, on average, only two minutes. Thanks to its ease of use and high modelling accuracy, we expect TCRpMHCmodels to provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of TCR and pMHC interactions and aid in the development of advanced T-cell-based immunotherapies and rational design of vaccines. The TCRpMHCmodels tool is available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TCRpMHCmodels/.Fil: Jensen, Kamilla Kjærgaard. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Rantos, Vasileios. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Jappe, Emma Christine. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Olsen, Tobias Hegelund. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Jespersen, Martin Closter. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Jurtz, Vanessa. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Jessen, Leon Eyrich. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Lanzarotti, Esteban Omar. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas; ArgentinaFil: Mahajan, Swapnil. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology; Estados UnidosFil: Peters, Bjoern. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology; Estados UnidosFil: Nielsen, Morten. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas; Argentina. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Marcatili, Paolo. Technical University of Denmark; Dinamarc

Information-Driven Docking for TCR-pMHC Complex Prediction

T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is a fundamental process in the adaptive immune system. An understanding of this recognition process at the molecular level is crucial for TCR based therapeutics and vaccine design. The broad nature of TCR diversity and cross-reactivity presents a challenge for traditional structural resolution. Computational modelling of TCR-pMHC complexes offers an efficient alternative. This study compares the ability of four general-purpose docking platforms (ClusPro, LightDock, ZDOCK and HADDOCK) to make use of varying levels of binding interface information for accurate TCR-pMHC modelling. Each platform was tested on an expanded benchmark set of 44 TCR-pMHC docking cases. In general, HADDOCK is shown to be the best performer. Docking strategy guidance is provided to obtain the best models for each platform for future research. The TCR-pMHC docking cases used in this study can be downloaded from https://github.com/innate2adaptive/ExpandedBenchmark

Predicting T Cell Receptor Antigen Specificity From Structural Features Derived From Homology Models of Receptor-Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complexes

The physical interaction between the T cell receptor (TCR) and its cognate antigen causes T cells to activate and participate in the immune response. Understanding this physical interaction is important in predicting TCR binding to a target epitope, as well as potential cross-reactivity. Here, we propose a way of collecting informative features of the binding interface from homology models of T cell receptor-peptide-major histocompatibility complex (TCR-pMHC) complexes. The information collected from these structures is sufficient to discriminate binding from non-binding TCR-pMHC pairs in multiple independent datasets. The classifier is limited by the number of crystal structures available for the homology modelling and by the size of the training set. However, the classifier shows comparable performance to sequence-based classifiers requiring much larger training sets

Information-Driven Docking for TCR-pMHC Complex Prediction

T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is a fundamental process in the adaptive immune system. An understanding of this recognition process at the molecular level is crucial for TCR based therapeutics and vaccine design. The broad nature of TCR diversity and cross-reactivity presents a challenge for traditional structural resolution. Computational modelling of TCR-pMHC complexes offers an efficient alternative. This study compares the ability of four general-purpose docking platforms (ClusPro, LightDock, ZDOCK and HADDOCK) to make use of varying levels of binding interface information for accurate TCR-pMHC modelling. Each platform was tested on an expanded benchmark set of 44 TCR-pMHC docking cases. In general, HADDOCK is shown to be the best performer. Docking strategy guidance is provided to obtain the best models for each platform for future research. The TCR-pMHC docking cases used in this study can be downloaded from https://github.com/innate2adaptive/ExpandedBenchmark

Computational Analysis of T Cell Receptor Repertoire and Structure

The human adaptive immune system has evolved to provide a sophisticated response to a vast body of pathogenic microbes and toxic substances. The primary mediators of this response are T and B lymphocytes. Antigenic peptides presented at the surface of infected cells by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules are recognised by T cell receptors (TCRs) with exceptional specificity. This specificity arises from the enormous diversity in TCR sequence and structure generated through an imprecise process of somatic gene recombination that takes place during T cell development. Quantification of the TCR repertoire through the analysis of data produced by high-throughput RNA sequencing allows for a characterisation of the immune response to disease over time and between patients, and the development of methods for diagnosis and therapeutic design. The latest version of the software package Decombinator extracts and quantifies the TCR repertoire with improved accuracy and compatibility with complementary experimental protocols and external computational tools. The software has been extended for analysis of fragmented short-read data from single cells, comparing favourably with two alternative tools. The development of cell-based therapeutics and vaccines is incomplete without an understanding of molecular level interactions. The breadth of TCR diversity and cross-reactivity presents a barrier for comprehensive structural resolution of the repertoire by traditional means. Computational modelling of TCR structures and TCR-pMHC complexes provides an efficient alternative. Four generalpurpose protein-protein docking platforms were compared in their ability to accurately model TCR-pMHC complexes. Each platform was evaluated against an expanded benchmark of docking test cases and in the context of varying additional information about the binding interface. Continual innovation in structural modelling techniques sets the stage for novel automated tools for TCR design. A prototype platform has been developed, integrating structural modelling and an optimisation routine, to engineer desirable features into TCR and TCR-pMHC complex models

Uncovering the Tumor Antigen Landscape : What to Know about the Discovery Process

According to the latest available data, cancer is the second leading cause of death, highlighting the need for novel cancer therapeutic approaches. In this context, immunotherapy is emerging as a reliable first-line treatment for many cancers, particularly metastatic melanoma. Indeed, cancer immunotherapy has attracted great interest following the recent clinical approval of antibodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, that release the brakes of the immune system, thus reviving a field otherwise poorly explored. Cancer immunotherapy mainly relies on the generation and stimulation of cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocytes (CTLs) within the tumor microenvironment (TME), priming T cells and establishing efficient and durable anti-tumor immunity. Therefore, there is a clear need to define and identify immunogenic T cell epitopes to use in therapeutic cancer vaccines. Naturally presented antigens in the human leucocyte antigen-1 (HLA-I) complex on the tumor surface are the main protagonists in evocating a specific anti-tumor CD8+ T cell response. However, the methodologies for their identification have been a major bottleneck for their reliable characterization. Consequently, the field of antigen discovery has yet to improve. The current review is intended to define what are today known as tumor antigens, with a main focus on CTL antigenic peptides. We also review the techniques developed and employed to date for antigen discovery, exploring both the direct elution of HLA-I peptides and the in silico prediction of epitopes. Finally, the last part of the review analyses the future challenges and direction of the antigen discovery field.Peer reviewe

Non-H3 CDR template selection in antibody modeling through machine learning

Antibodies are proteins generated by the adaptive immune system to recognize and counteract a plethora of pathogens through specific binding. This adaptive binding is mediated by structural diversity in the six complementary determining region (CDR) loops (H1, H2, H3, L1, L2 and L3), which also makes accurate structural modeling of CDRs challenging. Both homology and de novo modeling approaches have been used; to date, the former has achieved greater accuracy for the non-H3 loops. The homology modeling of non-H3 CDRs is more accurate because non-H3 CDR loops of the same length and type can be grouped into a few structural clusters. Most antibody-modeling suites utilize homology modeling for the non-H3 CDRs, differing only in the alignment algorithm and how/if they utilize structural clusters. While RosettaAntibody and SAbPred do not explicitly assign query CDR sequences to clusters, two other approaches, PIGS and Kotai Antibody Builder, utilize sequence-based rules to assign CDR sequences to clusters. While the manually curated sequence rules can identify better structural templates, because their curation requires extensive literature search and human effort, they lag behind the deposition of new antibody structures and are infrequently updated. In this study, we propose a machine learning approach (Gradient Boosting Machine [GBM]) to learn the structural clusters of non-H3 CDRs from sequence alone. The GBM method simplifies feature selection and can easily integrate new data, compared to manual sequence rule curation. We compare the classification results using the GBM method to that of RosettaAntibody in a 3-repeat 10-fold cross-validation (CV) scheme on the cluster-annotated antibody database PyIgClassify and we observe an improvement in the classification accuracy of the concerned loops from 84.5% ± 0.24% to 88.16% ± 0.056%. The GBM models reduce the errors in specific cluster membership misclassifications when the involved clusters have relatively abundant data. Based on the factors identified, we suggest methods that can enrich structural classes with sparse data to further improve prediction accuracy in future studies

The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource Program 2003–2018: reflections and outlook

The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB) contains information related to antibodies and T cells across an expansive scope of research fields (infectious diseases, allergy, autoimmunity, and transplantation). Capture and representation of the data to reflect growing scientific standards and techniques have required continual refinement of our rigorous curation and query and reporting processes beginning with the automated classification of over 28 million PubMed abstracts, and resulting in easily searchable data from over 20,000 published manuscripts. Data related to MHC binding and elution, nonpeptidics, natural processing, receptors, and 3D structure is first captured through manual curation and subsequently maintained through recuration to reflect evolving scientific standards. Upon promotion to the free, public database, users can query and export records of specific relevance via the online web portal which undergoes iterative development to best enable efficient data access. In parallel, the companion Analysis Resource site hosts a variety of tools that assist in the bioinformatic analyses of epitopes and related structures, which can be applied to IEDB-derived and independent datasets alike. Available tools are classified into two categories: analysis and prediction. Analysis tools include epitope clustering, sequence conservancy, and more, while prediction tools cover T and B cell epitope binding, immunogenicity, and TCR/BCR structures. In addition to these tools, benchmarking servers which allow for unbiased performance comparison are also offered. In order to expand and support the user-base of both the database and Analysis Resource, the research team actively engages in community outreach through publication of ongoing work, conference attendance and presentations, hosting of user workshops, and the provision of online help. This review provides a description of the IEDB database infrastructure, curation and recuration processes, query and reporting capabilities, the Analysis Resource, and our Community Outreach efforts, including assessment of the impact of the IEDB across the research community.Fil: Martini, Sheridan. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology; Estados UnidosFil: Nielsen, Morten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas; Argentina. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Peters, Bjoern. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology; Estados Unidos. University of California at San Diego; Estados UnidosFil: Sette, Alessandro. La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology; Estados Unidos. University of California at San Diego; Estados Unido