190,526 research outputs found

    Generalized Orlicz spaces and Wasserstein distances for convex-concave scale functions

    Get PDF
    Given a strictly increasing, continuous function ϑ:R+R+\vartheta:\R_+\to\R_+, based on the cost functional X×Xϑ(d(x,y))dq(x,y)\int_{X\times X}\vartheta(d(x,y))\,d q(x,y), we define the LϑL^\vartheta-Wasserstein distance Wϑ(μ,ν)W_\vartheta(\mu,\nu) between probability measures μ,ν\mu,\nu on some metric space (X,d)(X,d). The function ϑ\vartheta will be assumed to admit a representation ϑ=ϕψ\vartheta=\phi\circ\psi as a composition of a convex and a concave function ϕ\phi and ψ\psi, resp. Besides convex functions and concave functions this includes all C2\mathcal C^2 functions. For such functions ϑ\vartheta we extend the concept of Orlicz spaces, defining the metric space Lϑ(X,m)L^\vartheta(X,m) of measurable functions f:XRf: X\to\R such that, for instance, d_\vartheta(f,g)\le1\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \int_X\vartheta(|f(x)-g(x)|)\,d\mu(x)\le1.$

    Convex Integer Optimization by Constantly Many Linear Counterparts

    Full text link
    In this article we study convex integer maximization problems with composite objective functions of the form f(Wx)f(Wx), where ff is a convex function on Rd\R^d and WW is a d×nd\times n matrix with small or binary entries, over finite sets SZnS\subset \Z^n of integer points presented by an oracle or by linear inequalities. Continuing the line of research advanced by Uri Rothblum and his colleagues on edge-directions, we introduce here the notion of {\em edge complexity} of SS, and use it to establish polynomial and constant upper bounds on the number of vertices of the projection \conv(WS) and on the number of linear optimization counterparts needed to solve the above convex problem. Two typical consequences are the following. First, for any dd, there is a constant m(d)m(d) such that the maximum number of vertices of the projection of any matroid S{0,1}nS\subset\{0,1\}^n by any binary d×nd\times n matrix WW is m(d)m(d) regardless of nn and SS; and the convex matroid problem reduces to m(d)m(d) greedily solvable linear counterparts. In particular, m(2)=8m(2)=8. Second, for any d,l,md,l,m, there is a constant t(d;l,m)t(d;l,m) such that the maximum number of vertices of the projection of any three-index l×m×nl\times m\times n transportation polytope for any nn by any binary d×(l×m×n)d\times(l\times m\times n) matrix WW is t(d;l,m)t(d;l,m); and the convex three-index transportation problem reduces to t(d;l,m)t(d;l,m) linear counterparts solvable in polynomial time

    About t-norms on type-2 fuzzy sets.

    Get PDF
    Walker et al. defined two families of binary operations on M (set of functions of [0,1] in [0,1]), and they determined that, under certain conditions, those operations are t-norms (triangular norm) or t-conorms on L (all the normal and convex functions of M). We define binary operations on M, more general than those given by Walker et al., and we study many properties of these general operations that allow us to deduce new t-norms and t-conorms on both L, and M

    Construction of points realizing the regular systems of Wolfgang Schmidt and Leonard Summerer

    Get PDF
    In a series of recent papers, W. M. Schmidt and L. Summerer developed a new theory by which they recover all major generic inequalities relating exponents of Diophantine approximation to a point in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and find new ones. Given a point in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, they first show how most of its exponents of Diophantine approximation can be computed in terms of the successive minima of a parametric family of convex bodies attached to that point. Then they prove that these successive minima can in turn be approximated by a certain class of functions which they call (n,γ)(n,\gamma)-systems. In this way, they bring the whole problem to the study of these functions. To complete the theory, one would like to know if, conversely, given an (n,γ)(n,\gamma)-system, there exists a point in Rn\mathbb{R}^n whose associated family of convex bodies has successive minima which approximate that function. In the present paper, we show that this is true for a class of functions which they call regular systems.Comment: 11 pages, 1 figure, to appear in Journal de th\'eorie des nombres de Bordeau

    On the minimization of Dirichlet eigenvalues

    Full text link
    Results are obtained for two minimization problems: Ik(c)=inf{λk(Ω):Ω open, convex in Rm, T(Ω)=c},I_k(c)=\inf \{\lambda_k(\Omega): \Omega\ \textup{open, convex in}\ \mathbb{R}^m,\ \mathcal{T}(\Omega)= c \}, and Jk(c)=inf{λk(Ω):Ω quasi-open in Rm,Ω1,P(Ω)c},J_k(c)=\inf\{\lambda_k(\Omega): \Omega\ \textup{quasi-open in}\ \mathbb{R}^m, |\Omega|\le 1, \mathcal {P}(\Omega)\le c \}, where c>0c>0, λk(Ω)\lambda_k(\Omega) is the kk'th eigenvalue of the Dirichlet Laplacian acting in L2(Ω)L^2(\Omega), Ω|\Omega| denotes the Lebesgue measure of Ω\Omega, P(Ω)\mathcal{P}(\Omega) denotes the perimeter of Ω\Omega, and where T\mathcal{T} is in a suitable class set functions. The latter include for example the perimeter of Ω\Omega, and the moment of inertia of Ω\Omega with respect to its center of mass.Comment: 15 page
    corecore