6,754 research outputs found
A foundation for machine learning in design
This paper presents a formalism for considering the issues of learning in design. A foundation for machine learning in design (MLinD) is defined so as to provide answers to basic questions on learning in design, such as, "What types of knowledge can be learnt?", "How does learning occur?", and "When does learning occur?". Five main elements of MLinD are presented as the input knowledge, knowledge transformers, output knowledge, goals/reasons for learning, and learning triggers. Using this foundation, published systems in MLinD were reviewed. The systematic review presents a basis for validating the presented foundation. The paper concludes that there is considerable work to be carried out in order to fully formalize the foundation of MLinD
Common Sense or World Knowledge? Investigating Adapter-Based Knowledge Injection into Pretrained Transformers
Following the major success of neural language models (LMs) such as BERT or
GPT-2 on a variety of language understanding tasks, recent work focused on
injecting (structured) knowledge from external resources into these models.
While on the one hand, joint pretraining (i.e., training from scratch, adding
objectives based on external knowledge to the primary LM objective) may be
prohibitively computationally expensive, post-hoc fine-tuning on external
knowledge, on the other hand, may lead to the catastrophic forgetting of
distributional knowledge. In this work, we investigate models for complementing
the distributional knowledge of BERT with conceptual knowledge from ConceptNet
and its corresponding Open Mind Common Sense (OMCS) corpus, respectively, using
adapter training. While overall results on the GLUE benchmark paint an
inconclusive picture, a deeper analysis reveals that our adapter-based models
substantially outperform BERT (up to 15-20 performance points) on inference
tasks that require the type of conceptual knowledge explicitly present in
ConceptNet and OMCS
Modelling collective learning in design
In this paper, a model of collective learning in design is developed in the context of team design. It explains that a team design activity uses input knowledge, environmental information, and design goals to produce output knowledge. A collective learning activity uses input knowledge from different agents and produces learned knowledge with the process of knowledge acquisition and transformation between different agents, which may be triggered by learning goals and rationale triggers. Different forms of collective learning were observed with respect to agent interactions, goal(s) of learning, and involvement of an agent. Three types of links between team design and collective learning were identified, namely teleological, rationale, and epistemic. Hypotheses of collective learning are made based upon existing theories and models in design and learning, which were tested using a protocol analysis approach. The model of collective learning in design is derived from the test results. The proposed model can be used as a basis to develop agent-based learning systems in design. In the future, collective learning between design teams, the links between collective learning and creativity, and computational support for collective learning can be investigated
Recommended from our members
The effect of multiple knowledge sources on learning and teaching
Current paradigms for machine-based learning and teaching tend to perform their task in isolation from a rich context of existing knowledge. In contrast, the research project presented here takes the view that bringing multiple sources of knowledge to bear is of central importance to learning in complex domains. As a consequence teaching must both take advantage of and beware of interactions between new and existing knowledge. The central process which connects learning to its context is reasoning by analogy, a primary concern of this research. In teaching, the connection is provided by the explicit use of a learning model to reason about the choice of teaching actions. In this learning paradigm, new concepts are incrementally refined and integrated into a body of expertise, rather than being evaluated against a static notion of correctness. The domain chosen for this experimentation is that of learning to solve "algebra story problems." A model of acquiring problem solving skills in this domain is described, including: representational structures for background knowledge, a problem solving architecture, learning mechanisms, and the role of analogies in applying existing problem solving abilities to novel problems. Examples of learning are given for representative instances of algebra story problems. After relating our views to the psychological literature, we outline the design of a teaching system. Finally, we insist on the interdependence of learning and teaching and on the synergistic effects of conducting both research efforts in parallel
- …