Detecting missing content queries in an SMS-Based HIV/AIDS FAQ retrieval system

Automated Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) answering systems use pre-stored sets of question-answer pairs as an information source to answer natural language questions posed by the users. The main problem with this kind of information source is that there is no guarantee that there will be a relevant question-answer pair for all user queries. In this paper, we propose to deploy a binary classifier in an existing SMS-Based HIV/AIDS FAQ retrieval system to detect user queries that do not have the relevant question-answer pair in the FAQ document collection. Before deploying such a classifier, we first evaluate different feature sets for training in order to determine the sets of features that can build a model that yields the best classification accuracy. We carry out our evaluation using seven different feature sets generated from a query log before and after retrieval by the FAQ retrieval system. Our results suggest that, combining different feature sets markedly improves the classification accuracy

Deep Learning versus Classical Regression for Brain Tumor Patient Survival Prediction

Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade brain tumors. The tested CNNs for regression showed promising but unstable results. The best performing deep learning approach reached an accuracy of 51.5% on held-out samples of the training set. All tested deep learning experiments were outperformed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using 30 radiomic features. The investigated features included intensity, shape, location and deep features. The submitted method to the BraTS 2018 survival prediction challenge is an ensemble of SVCs, which reached a cross-validated accuracy of 72.2% on the BraTS 2018 training set, 57.1% on the validation set, and 42.9% on the testing set. The results suggest that more training data is necessary for a stable performance of a CNN model for direct regression from magnetic resonance images, and that non-imaging clinical patient information is crucial along with imaging information.Comment: Contribution to The International Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2018, survival prediction tas