2,452 research outputs found
TP-Compilation for inference in probabilistic logic programs
We propose TP -compilation, a new inference technique for probabilistic logic programs that is based on forward reasoning. TP -compilation proceeds incrementally in that it interleaves the knowledge compilation step for weighted model counting with forward reasoning on the logic program. This leads to a novel anytime algorithm that provides hard bounds on the inferred probabilities. The main difference with existing inference techniques for probabilistic logic programs is that these are a sequence of isolated transformations. Typically, these transformations include conversion of the ground program into an equivalent propositional formula and compilation of this formula into a more tractable target representation for weighted model counting. An empirical evaluation shows that TP -compilation effectively handles larger instances of complex or cyclic real-world problems than current sequential approaches, both for exact and anytime approximate inference. Furthermore, we show that TP -compilation is conducive to inference in dynamic domains as it supports efficient updates to the compiled model
Symbolic Exact Inference for Discrete Probabilistic Programs
The computational burden of probabilistic inference remains a hurdle for
applying probabilistic programming languages to practical problems of interest.
In this work, we provide a semantic and algorithmic foundation for efficient
exact inference on discrete-valued finite-domain imperative probabilistic
programs. We leverage and generalize efficient inference procedures for
Bayesian networks, which exploit the structure of the network to decompose the
inference task, thereby avoiding full path enumeration. To do this, we first
compile probabilistic programs to a symbolic representation. Then we adapt
techniques from the probabilistic logic programming and artificial intelligence
communities in order to perform inference on the symbolic representation. We
formalize our approach, prove it sound, and experimentally validate it against
existing exact and approximate inference techniques. We show that our inference
approach is competitive with inference procedures specialized for Bayesian
networks, thereby expanding the class of probabilistic programs that can be
practically analyzed
Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs using Weighted CNF's
Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts
are annotated with probabilities. Several classical probabilistic inference
tasks (such as MAP and computing marginals) have not yet received a lot of
attention for this formalism. The contribution of this paper is that we develop
efficient inference algorithms for these tasks. This is based on a conversion
of the probabilistic logic program and the query and evidence to a weighted CNF
formula. This allows us to reduce the inference tasks to well-studied tasks
such as weighted model counting. To solve such tasks, we employ
state-of-the-art methods. We consider multiple methods for the conversion of
the programs as well as for inference on the weighted CNF. The resulting
approach is evaluated experimentally and shown to improve upon the
state-of-the-art in probabilistic logic programming
Knowledge Compilation of Logic Programs Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory
To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of
ICLP 2015
Recent advances in knowledge compilation introduced techniques to compile
\emph{positive} logic programs into propositional logic, essentially exploiting
the constructive nature of the least fixpoint computation. This approach has
several advantages over existing approaches: it maintains logical equivalence,
does not require (expensive) loop-breaking preprocessing or the introduction of
auxiliary variables, and significantly outperforms existing algorithms.
Unfortunately, this technique is limited to \emph{negation-free} programs. In
this paper, we show how to extend it to general logic programs under the
well-founded semantics.
We develop our work in approximation fixpoint theory, an algebraical
framework that unifies semantics of different logics. As such, our algebraical
results are also applicable to autoepistemic logic, default logic and abstract
dialectical frameworks
Probabilistic Program Abstractions
Abstraction is a fundamental tool for reasoning about complex systems.
Program abstraction has been utilized to great effect for analyzing
deterministic programs. At the heart of program abstraction is the relationship
between a concrete program, which is difficult to analyze, and an abstract
program, which is more tractable. Program abstractions, however, are typically
not probabilistic. We generalize non-deterministic program abstractions to
probabilistic program abstractions by explicitly quantifying the
non-deterministic choices. Our framework upgrades key definitions and
properties of abstractions to the probabilistic context. We also discuss
preliminary ideas for performing inference on probabilistic abstractions and
general probabilistic programs
- …