393 research outputs found
Knapsack Cover Subject to a Matroid Constraint
We consider the Knapsack Covering problem subject to a matroid constraint. In this problem, we are given an universe U of n items where item i has attributes: a cost c(i) and a size s(i). We also have a demand D. We are also given a matroid M = (U, I) on the set U. A feasible solution S to the problem is one such that (i) the cumulative size of the items chosen is at least D, and (ii) the set S is independent in the matroid M (i.e. S is in I). The objective is to minimize the total cost of the items selected, sum_{i in S}c(i).
Our main result proves a 2-factor approximation for this problem.
The problem described above falls in the realm of mixed packing covering problems. We also consider packing extensions of certain other covering problems and prove that in such cases it is not possible to derive any constant factor pproximations
Constrained Non-Monotone Submodular Maximization: Offline and Secretary Algorithms
Constrained submodular maximization problems have long been studied, with
near-optimal results known under a variety of constraints when the submodular
function is monotone. The case of non-monotone submodular maximization is less
understood: the first approximation algorithms even for the unconstrainted
setting were given by Feige et al. (FOCS '07). More recently, Lee et al. (STOC
'09, APPROX '09) show how to approximately maximize non-monotone submodular
functions when the constraints are given by the intersection of p matroid
constraints; their algorithm is based on local-search procedures that consider
p-swaps, and hence the running time may be n^Omega(p), implying their algorithm
is polynomial-time only for constantly many matroids. In this paper, we give
algorithms that work for p-independence systems (which generalize constraints
given by the intersection of p matroids), where the running time is poly(n,p).
Our algorithm essentially reduces the non-monotone maximization problem to
multiple runs of the greedy algorithm previously used in the monotone case.
Our idea of using existing algorithms for monotone functions to solve the
non-monotone case also works for maximizing a submodular function with respect
to a knapsack constraint: we get a simple greedy-based constant-factor
approximation for this problem.
With these simpler algorithms, we are able to adapt our approach to
constrained non-monotone submodular maximization to the (online) secretary
setting, where elements arrive one at a time in random order, and the algorithm
must make irrevocable decisions about whether or not to select each element as
it arrives. We give constant approximations in this secretary setting when the
algorithm is constrained subject to a uniform matroid or a partition matroid,
and give an O(log k) approximation when it is constrained by a general matroid
of rank k.Comment: In the Proceedings of WINE 201
Robust and MaxMin Optimization under Matroid and Knapsack Uncertainty Sets
Consider the following problem: given a set system (U,I) and an edge-weighted
graph G = (U, E) on the same universe U, find the set A in I such that the
Steiner tree cost with terminals A is as large as possible: "which set in I is
the most difficult to connect up?" This is an example of a max-min problem:
find the set A in I such that the value of some minimization (covering) problem
is as large as possible.
In this paper, we show that for certain covering problems which admit good
deterministic online algorithms, we can give good algorithms for max-min
optimization when the set system I is given by a p-system or q-knapsacks or
both. This result is similar to results for constrained maximization of
submodular functions. Although many natural covering problems are not even
approximately submodular, we show that one can use properties of the online
algorithm as a surrogate for submodularity.
Moreover, we give stronger connections between max-min optimization and
two-stage robust optimization, and hence give improved algorithms for robust
versions of various covering problems, for cases where the uncertainty sets are
given by p-systems and q-knapsacks.Comment: 17 pages. Preliminary version combining this paper and
http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1045 appeared in ICALP 201
Matroid and Knapsack Center Problems
In the classic -center problem, we are given a metric graph, and the
objective is to open nodes as centers such that the maximum distance from
any vertex to its closest center is minimized. In this paper, we consider two
important generalizations of -center, the matroid center problem and the
knapsack center problem. Both problems are motivated by recent content
distribution network applications. Our contributions can be summarized as
follows:
1. We consider the matroid center problem in which the centers are required
to form an independent set of a given matroid. We show this problem is NP-hard
even on a line. We present a 3-approximation algorithm for the problem on
general metrics. We also consider the outlier version of the problem where a
given number of vertices can be excluded as the outliers from the solution. We
present a 7-approximation for the outlier version.
2. We consider the (multi-)knapsack center problem in which the centers are
required to satisfy one (or more) knapsack constraint(s). It is known that the
knapsack center problem with a single knapsack constraint admits a
3-approximation. However, when there are at least two knapsack constraints, we
show this problem is not approximable at all. To complement the hardness
result, we present a polynomial time algorithm that gives a 3-approximate
solution such that one knapsack constraint is satisfied and the others may be
violated by at most a factor of . We also obtain a 3-approximation
for the outlier version that may violate the knapsack constraint by
.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper is accepted to IPCO 201
Randomized Strategies for Robust Combinatorial Optimization
In this paper, we study the following robust optimization problem. Given an
independence system and candidate objective functions, we choose an independent
set, and then an adversary chooses one objective function, knowing our choice.
Our goal is to find a randomized strategy (i.e., a probability distribution
over the independent sets) that maximizes the expected objective value. To
solve the problem, we propose two types of schemes for designing approximation
algorithms. One scheme is for the case when objective functions are linear. It
first finds an approximately optimal aggregated strategy and then retrieves a
desired solution with little loss of the objective value. The approximation
ratio depends on a relaxation of an independence system polytope. As
applications, we provide approximation algorithms for a knapsack constraint or
a matroid intersection by developing appropriate relaxations and retrievals.
The other scheme is based on the multiplicative weights update method. A key
technique is to introduce a new concept called -reductions for
objective functions with parameters . We show that our scheme
outputs a nearly -approximate solution if there exists an
-approximation algorithm for a subproblem defined by
-reductions. This improves approximation ratio in previous
results. Using our result, we provide approximation algorithms when the
objective functions are submodular or correspond to the cardinality robustness
for the knapsack problem
- …