33,441 research outputs found
Towards new information resources for public health: From WordNet to MedicalWordNet
In the last two decades, WORDNET has evolved as the most comprehensive computational lexicon of general English. In this article, we discuss its potential for supporting the creation of an entirely new kind of information resource for public health, viz. MEDICAL WORDNET. This resource is not to be conceived merely as a lexical extension of the original WORDNET to medical terminology; indeed, there is already a considerable degree of overlap between WORDNET and the vocabulary of medicine. Instead, we propose a new type of repository, consisting of three large collections of (1) medically relevant word forms, structured along the lines of the existing Princeton WORDNET; (2) medically validated propositions, referred to here as medical facts, which will constitute what we shall call MEDICAL FACTNET; and (3) propositions reflecting laypersons’ medical beliefs, which will constitute what we shall call the MEDICAL BELIEFNET. We introduce a methodology for setting up the MEDICAL WORDNET. We then turn to the discussion of research challenges that have to be met in order to build this new type of information resource
Barry Smith an sich
Festschrift in Honor of Barry Smith on the occasion of his 65th Birthday. Published as issue 4:4 of the journal Cosmos + Taxis: Studies in Emergent Order and Organization. Includes contributions by Wolfgang Grassl, Nicola Guarino, John T. Kearns, Rudolf Lüthe, Luc Schneider, Peter Simons, Wojciech Żełaniec, and Jan Woleński
Multimodal Machine Learning for Automated ICD Coding
This study presents a multimodal machine learning model to predict ICD-10
diagnostic codes. We developed separate machine learning models that can handle
data from different modalities, including unstructured text, semi-structured
text and structured tabular data. We further employed an ensemble method to
integrate all modality-specific models to generate ICD-10 codes. Key evidence
was also extracted to make our prediction more convincing and explainable. We
used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC -III) dataset
to validate our approach. For ICD code prediction, our best-performing model
(micro-F1 = 0.7633, micro-AUC = 0.9541) significantly outperforms other
baseline models including TF-IDF (micro-F1 = 0.6721, micro-AUC = 0.7879) and
Text-CNN model (micro-F1 = 0.6569, micro-AUC = 0.9235). For interpretability,
our approach achieves a Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) of 0.1806 on text
data and 0.3105 on tabular data, where well-trained physicians achieve 0.2780
and 0.5002 respectively.Comment: Machine Learning for Healthcare 201
The journals of importance to UK clinicians: A questionnaire survey of surgeons
Background: Peer-reviewed journals are seen as a major vehicle in the transmission of research
findings to clinicians. Perspectives on the importance of individual journals vary and the use of
impact factors to assess research is criticised. Other surveys of clinicians suggest a few key journals
within a specialty, and sub-specialties, are widely read. Journals with high impact factors are not
always widely read or perceived as important. In order to determine whether UK surgeons
consider peer-reviewed journals to be important information sources and which journals they read
and consider important to inform their clinical practice, we conducted a postal questionnaire
survey and then compared the findings with those from a survey of US surgeons.
Methods: A questionnaire survey sent to 2,660 UK surgeons asked which information sources
they considered to be important and which peer-reviewed journals they read, and perceived as
important, to inform their clinical practice. Comparisons were made with numbers of UK NHSfunded
surgery publications, journal impact factors and other similar surveys.
Results: Peer-reviewed journals were considered to be the second most important information
source for UK surgeons. A mode of four journals read was found with academics reading more
than non-academics. Two journals, the BMJ and the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,
are prominent across all sub-specialties and others within sub-specialties. The British Journal of
Surgery plays a key role within three sub-specialties. UK journals are generally preferred and
readership patterns are influenced by membership journals. Some of the journals viewed by
surgeons as being most important, for example the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,
do not have high impact factors.
Conclusion: Combining the findings from this study with comparable studies highlights the
importance of national journals and of membership journals. Our study also illustrates the
complexity of the link between the impact factors of journals and the importance of the journals
to clinicians. This analysis potentially provides an additional basis on which to assess the role of
different journals, and the published output from research
A Short Review of Ethical Challenges in Clinical Natural Language Processing
Clinical NLP has an immense potential in contributing to how clinical
practice will be revolutionized by the advent of large scale processing of
clinical records. However, this potential has remained largely untapped due to
slow progress primarily caused by strict data access policies for researchers.
In this paper, we discuss the concern for privacy and the measures it entails.
We also suggest sources of less sensitive data. Finally, we draw attention to
biases that can compromise the validity of empirical research and lead to
socially harmful applications.Comment: First Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing (EACL'17
- …