Benefits and limits of machine learning for the implicit coordination on SON functions

Bedingt durch die Einführung neuer Netzfunktionen in den Mobilfunknetzen der nächsten Generation, z. B. Slicing oder Mehrantennensysteme, sowie durch die Koexistenz mehrerer Funkzugangstechnologien, werden die Optimierungsaufgaben äußerst komplex und erhöhen die OPEX (OPerational EXpenditures). Um den Nutzern Dienste mit wettbewerbsfähiger Dienstgüte (QoS) zu bieten und gleichzeitig die Betriebskosten niedrig zu halten, wurde von den Standardisierungsgremien das Konzept des selbstorganisierenden Netzes (SON) eingeführt, um das Netzmanagement um eine Automatisierungsebene zu erweitern. Es wurden dafür mehrere SON-Funktionen (SFs) vorgeschlagen, um einen bestimmten Netzbereich, wie Abdeckung oder Kapazität, zu optimieren. Bei dem konventionellen Entwurf der SFs wurde jede Funktion als Regler mit geschlossenem Regelkreis konzipiert, der ein lokales Ziel durch die Einstellung bestimmter Netzwerkparameter optimiert. Die Beziehung zwischen mehreren SFs wurde dabei jedoch bis zu einem gewissen Grad vernachlässigt. Daher treten viele widersprüchliche Szenarien auf, wenn mehrere SFs in einem mobilen Netzwerk instanziiert werden. Solche widersprüchlichen Funktionen in den Netzen verschlechtern die QoS der Benutzer und beeinträchtigen die Signalisierungsressourcen im Netz. Es wird daher erwartet, dass eine existierende Koordinierungsschicht (die auch eine Entität im Netz sein könnte) die Konflikte zwischen SFs lösen kann. Da diese Funktionen jedoch eng miteinander verknüpft sind, ist es schwierig, ihre Interaktionen und Abhängigkeiten in einer abgeschlossenen Form zu modellieren. Daher wird maschinelles Lernen vorgeschlagen, um eine gemeinsame Optimierung eines globalen Leistungsindikators (Key Performance Indicator, KPI) so voranzubringen, dass die komplizierten Beziehungen zwischen den Funktionen verborgen bleiben. Wir nennen diesen Ansatz: implizite Koordination. Im ersten Teil dieser Arbeit schlagen wir eine zentralisierte, implizite und auf maschinellem Lernen basierende Koordination vor und wenden sie auf die Koordination zweier etablierter SFs an: Mobility Robustness Optimization (MRO) und Mobility Load Balancing (MLB). Anschließend gestalten wir die Lösung dateneffizienter (d. h. wir erreichen die gleiche Modellleistung mit weniger Trainingsdaten), indem wir eine geschlossene Modellierung einbetten, um einen Teil des optimalen Parametersatzes zu finden. Wir nennen dies einen "hybriden Ansatz". Mit dem hybriden Ansatz untersuchen wir den Konflikt zwischen MLB und Coverage and Capacity Optimization (CCO) Funktionen. Dann wenden wir ihn auf die Koordinierung zwischen MLB, Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) und Energy Savings (ES) Funktionen an. Schließlich stellen wir eine Möglichkeit vor, MRO formal in den hybriden Ansatz einzubeziehen, und zeigen, wie der Rahmen erweitert werden kann, um anspruchsvolle Netzwerkszenarien wie Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communications (URLLC) abzudecken.Due to the introduction of new network functionalities in next-generation mobile networks, e.g., slicing or multi-antenna systems, as well as the coexistence of multiple radio access technologies, the optimization tasks become extremely complex, increasing the OPEX (OPerational EXpenditures). In order to provide services to the users with competitive Quality of Service (QoS) while keeping low operational costs, the Self-Organizing Network (SON) concept was introduced by the standardization bodies to add an automation layer to the network management. Thus, multiple SON functions (SFs) were proposed to optimize a specific network domain, like coverage or capacity. The conventional design of SFs conceived each function as a closed-loop controller optimizing a local objective by tuning specific network parameters. However, the relationship among multiple SFs was neglected to some extent. Therefore, many conflicting scenarios appear when multiple SFs are instantiated in a mobile network. Having conflicting functions in the networks deteriorates the users’ QoS and affects the signaling resources in the network. Thus, it is expected to have a coordination layer (which could also be an entity in the network), conciliating the conflicts between SFs. Nevertheless, due to interleaved linkage among those functions, it is complex to model their interactions and dependencies in a closed form. Thus, machine learning is proposed to drive a joint optimization of a global Key Performance Indicator (KPI), hiding the intricate relationships between functions. We call this approach: implicit coordination. In the first part of this thesis, we propose a centralized, fully-implicit coordination approach based on machine learning (ML), and apply it to the coordination of two well-established SFs: Mobility Robustness Optimization (MRO) and Mobility Load Balancing (MLB). We find that this approach can be applied as long as the coordination problem is decomposed into three functional planes: controllable, environmental, and utility planes. However, the fully-implicit coordination comes at a high cost: it requires a large amount of data to train the ML models. To improve the data efficiency of our approach (i.e., achieving good model performance with less training data), we propose a hybrid approach, which mixes ML with closed-form models. With the hybrid approach, we study the conflict between MLB and Coverage and Capacity Optimization (CCO) functions. Then, we apply it to the coordination among MLB, Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC), and Energy Savings (ES) functions. With the hybrid approach, we find in one shot, part of the parameter set in an optimal manner, which makes it suitable for dynamic scenarios in which fast response is expected from a centralized coordinator. Finally, we present a manner to formally include MRO in the hybrid approach and show how the framework can be extended to cover challenging network scenarios like Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communications (URLLC)

A survey of self organisation in future cellular networks

This article surveys the literature over the period of the last decade on the emerging field of self organisation as applied to wireless cellular communication networks. Self organisation has been extensively studied and applied in adhoc networks, wireless sensor networks and autonomic computer networks; however in the context of wireless cellular networks, this is the first attempt to put in perspective the various efforts in form of a tutorial/survey. We provide a comprehensive survey of the existing literature, projects and standards in self organising cellular networks. Additionally, we also aim to present a clear understanding of this active research area, identifying a clear taxonomy and guidelines for design of self organising mechanisms. We compare strength and weakness of existing solutions and highlight the key research areas for further development. This paper serves as a guide and a starting point for anyone willing to delve into research on self organisation in wireless cellular communication networks

Separation Framework: An Enabler for Cooperative and D2D Communication for Future 5G Networks

Soaring capacity and coverage demands dictate that future cellular networks need to soon migrate towards ultra-dense networks. However, network densification comes with a host of challenges that include compromised energy efficiency, complex interference management, cumbersome mobility management, burdensome signaling overheads and higher backhaul costs. Interestingly, most of the problems, that beleaguer network densification, stem from legacy networks' one common feature i.e., tight coupling between the control and data planes regardless of their degree of heterogeneity and cell density. Consequently, in wake of 5G, control and data planes separation architecture (SARC) has recently been conceived as a promising paradigm that has potential to address most of aforementioned challenges. In this article, we review various proposals that have been presented in literature so far to enable SARC. More specifically, we analyze how and to what degree various SARC proposals address the four main challenges in network densification namely: energy efficiency, system level capacity maximization, interference management and mobility management. We then focus on two salient features of future cellular networks that have not yet been adapted in legacy networks at wide scale and thus remain a hallmark of 5G, i.e., coordinated multipoint (CoMP), and device-to-device (D2D) communications. After providing necessary background on CoMP and D2D, we analyze how SARC can particularly act as a major enabler for CoMP and D2D in context of 5G. This article thus serves as both a tutorial as well as an up to date survey on SARC, CoMP and D2D. Most importantly, the article provides an extensive outlook of challenges and opportunities that lie at the crossroads of these three mutually entangled emerging technologies.Comment: 28 pages, 11 figures, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 201

Generalized Coordinated Multipoint Framework for 5G and Beyond

The characteristic feature of 5G is the diversity of its services for different user needs. However, the requirements for these services are competing in nature, which impresses the necessity of a coordinated and flexible network architecture. Although coordinated multipoint (CoMP) systems were primarily proposed to improve the cell edge performance in 4G, their collaborative nature can be leveraged to support the diverse requirements and enabling technologies of 5G and beyond networks. To this end, we propose generalization of CoMP to a proactive and efficient resource utilization framework capable of supporting different user requirements such as reliability, latency, throughput, and security while considering network constraints. This article elaborates on the multiple aspects, inputs, and outputs of the generalized CoMP (GCoMP) framework. Apart from user requirements, the GCoMP decision mechanism also considers the CoMP scenario and network architecture to decide upon outputs such as CoMP technique or appropriate coordinating clusters. To enable easier understanding of the concept, popular use cases, such as vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication and eHealth, are studied. Additionally, interesting challenges and open areas in GCoMP are discussed.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figure

A survey of machine learning techniques applied to self organizing cellular networks

In this paper, a survey of the literature of the past fifteen years involving Machine Learning (ML) algorithms applied to self organizing cellular networks is performed. In order for future networks to overcome the current limitations and address the issues of current cellular systems, it is clear that more intelligence needs to be deployed, so that a fully autonomous and flexible network can be enabled. This paper focuses on the learning perspective of Self Organizing Networks (SON) solutions and provides, not only an overview of the most common ML techniques encountered in cellular networks, but also manages to classify each paper in terms of its learning solution, while also giving some examples. The authors also classify each paper in terms of its self-organizing use-case and discuss how each proposed solution performed. In addition, a comparison between the most commonly found ML algorithms in terms of certain SON metrics is performed and general guidelines on when to choose each ML algorithm for each SON function are proposed. Lastly, this work also provides future research directions and new paradigms that the use of more robust and intelligent algorithms, together with data gathered by operators, can bring to the cellular networks domain and fully enable the concept of SON in the near future