The solvability of consensus in iterated models extended with safe-consensus

The safe-consensus task was introduced by Afek, Gafni and Lieber (DISC'09) as a weakening of the classic consensus. When there is concurrency, the consensus output can be arbitrary, not even the input of any process. They showed that safe-consensus is equivalent to consensus, in a wait-free system. We study the solvability of consensus in three shared memory iterated models extended with the power of safe-consensus black boxes. In the first model, for the $i$-th iteration, processes write to the memory, invoke safe-consensus boxes and finally they snapshot the memory. We show that in this model, any wait-free implementation of consensus requires $\binom{n}{2}$ safe-consensus black-boxes and this bound is tight. In a second iterated model, the processes write to memory, then they snapshot it and finally they invoke safe-consensus boxes. We prove that in this model, consensus cannot be implemented. In the last iterated model, processes first invoke safe-consensus, then they write to memory and finally they snapshot it. We show that this model is equivalent to the previous model and thus consensus cannot be implemented.Comment: 49 pages, A preliminar version of the main results appeared in the SIROCCO 2014 proceeding

Strong Equivalence Relations for Iterated Models

The Iterated Immediate Snapshot model (IIS), due to its elegant geometrical representation, has become standard for applying topological reasoning to distributed computing. Its modular structure makes it easier to analyze than the more realistic (non-iterated) read-write Atomic-Snapshot memory model (AS). It is known that AS and IIS are equivalent with respect to \emph{wait-free task} computability: a distributed task is solvable in AS if and only if it solvable in IIS. We observe, however, that this equivalence is not sufficient in order to explore solvability of tasks in \emph{sub-models} of AS (i.e. proper subsets of its runs) or computability of \emph{long-lived} objects, and a stronger equivalence relation is needed. In this paper, we consider \emph{adversarial} sub-models of AS and IIS specified by the sets of processes that can be \emph{correct} in a model run. We show that AS and IIS are equivalent in a strong way: a (possibly long-lived) object is implementable in AS under a given adversary if and only if it is implementable in IIS under the same adversary. %This holds whether the object is one-shot or long-lived. Therefore, the computability of any object in shared memory under an adversarial AS scheduler can be equivalently investigated in IIS

An Introduction to the Topological Theory of Distributed Computing with Safe-consensus

AbstractThe theory of distributed computing shares a deep and fascinating connection with combinatorial and algebraic topology. One of the key ideas that facilitates the development of the topological theory of distributed computing is the use of iterated shared memory models. In such a model processes communicate through a sequence of shared objects. Processes access the sequence of objects, one-by-one, in the same order and asynchronously. Each process accesses each shared object only once. In the most basic form of an iterated model, any number of processes can crash, and the shared objects are snapshot objects. A process can write a value to such an object, and gets back a snapshot of its contents.The purpose of this paper is to give an introduction to this research area, using an iterated model based on the safe-consensus task (Afek, Gafni and Lieber, DISCʼ09). In a safe-consensus task, the validity condition of consensus is weakened as follows. If the first process to invoke an object solving a safe-consensus task returns before any other process invokes it, then the process gets back its own input; otherwise the value returned by the task can be arbitrary. As with consensus, the agreement requirement is that always the same value is returned to all processes.A safe-consensus-based iterated model is described in detail. It is explained how its runs can be described with simplicial complexes. The usefulness of the iterated memory model for the topological theory of distributed computing is exhibited by presenting some new results (with very clean and well structured proofs) about the solvability of the (n,k)-set agreement task. Throughout the paper, the main ideas are explained with figures and intuitive examples

Adults are more efficient in creating and transmitting novel signalling systems than children

Iterated language learning experiments have shown that meaningful and structured signalling systems emerge when there is pressure for signals to be both learnable and expressive. Yet such experiments have mainly been conducted with adults using language-like signals. Here we explore whether structured signalling systems can also emerge when signalling domains are unfamiliar and when the learners are children with their well-attested cognitive and pragmatic limitations. In Experiment 1, we compared iterated learning of binary auditory sequences denoting small sets of meanings in chains of adults and 5-7-year old children. Signalling systems became more learnable even though iconicity and structure did not emerge despite applying a homonymy filter designed to keep the systems expressive. When the same types of signals were used in referential communication by adult and child dyads in Experiment 2, only the adults, but not the children, were able to negotiate shared iconic and structured signals. Referential communication using their native language by 4-5-year old children in Experiment 3 showed that only interaction with adults, but not with peers resulted in informative expressions. These findings suggest that emergence and transmission of communication systems is unlikely to be driven by children, and point to the importance of cognitive maturity and pragmatic expertise of learners as well as feedback-based scaffolding of communicative effectiveness by experts during language evolution