Layer by layer - Combining Monads

We develop a method to incrementally construct programming languages. Our approach is categorical: each layer of the language is described as a monad. Our method either (i) concretely builds a distributive law between two monads, i.e. layers of the language, which then provides a monad structure to the composition of layers, or (ii) identifies precisely the algebraic obstacles to the existence of a distributive law and gives a best approximant language. The running example will involve three layers: a basic imperative language enriched first by adding non-determinism and then probabilistic choice. The first extension works seamlessly, but the second encounters an obstacle, which results in a best approximant language structurally very similar to the probabilistic network specification language ProbNetKAT

Scope ambiguities, monads and strengths

In this paper, we will discuss three semantically distinct scope assignment strategies: traditional movement strategy, polyadic approach, and continuation-based approach. As a generalized quantifier on a set X is an element of C(X), the value of continuation monad C on X, in all three approaches QPs are interpreted as C-computations. The main goal of this paper is to relate the three strategies to the computational machinery connected to the monad C (strength and derived operations). As will be shown, both the polyadic approach and the continuation-based approach make heavy use of monad constructs. In the traditional movement strategy, monad constructs are not used but we still need them to explain how the three strategies are related and what can be expected of them wrt handling scopal ambiguities in simple sentences.Comment: 47 pages, small correction

Monad Transformers for Backtracking Search

This paper extends Escardo and Oliva's selection monad to the selection monad transformer, a general monadic framework for expressing backtracking search algorithms in Haskell. The use of the closely related continuation monad transformer for similar purposes is also discussed, including an implementation of a DPLL-like SAT solver with no explicit recursion. Continuing a line of work exploring connections between selection functions and game theory, we use the selection monad transformer with the nondeterminism monad to obtain an intuitive notion of backward induction for a certain class of nondeterministic games.Comment: In Proceedings MSFP 2014, arXiv:1406.153

Powerset-Like Monads Weakly Distribute over Themselves in Toposes and Compact Hausdorff Spaces

The powerset monad on the category of sets does not distribute over itself. Nevertheless a weaker form of distributive law of the powerset monad over itself exists and it essentially stems from the canonical Egli-Milner extension of the powerset to the category of relations. On the other hand, any regular category yields a category of relations, and some regular categories also possess a powerset-like monad, as is the Vietoris monad on compact Hausdorff spaces. We derive the Egli-Milner extension in three different frameworks : sets, toposes, and compact Hausdorff spaces. We prove that it corresponds to a monotone weak distributive law in each case by showing that the multiplication extends to relations but the unit does not. We provide an application to coalgebraic determinization of alternating automata

Preservation of Equations by Monoidal Monads

If a monad T is monoidal, then operations on a set X can be lifted canonically to operations on TX. In this paper we study structural properties under which T preserves equations between those operations. It has already been shown that any monoidal monad preserves linear equations; affine monads preserve drop equations (where some variable appears only on one side, such as x? y = y) and relevant monads preserve dup equations (where some variable is duplicated, such as x ? x = x). We start the paper by showing a converse: if the monad at hand preserves a drop equation, then it must be affine. From this, we show that the problem whether a given (drop) equation is preserved is undecidable. A converse for relevance turns out to be more subtle: preservation of certain dup equations implies a weaker notion which we call n-relevance. Finally, we identify a subclass of equations such that their preservation is equivalent to relevance

High-level signatures and initial semantics

We present a device for specifying and reasoning about syntax for datatypes, programming languages, and logic calculi. More precisely, we study a notion of signature for specifying syntactic constructions. In the spirit of Initial Semantics, we define the syntax generated by a signature to be the initial object---if it exists---in a suitable category of models. In our framework, the existence of an associated syntax to a signature is not automatically guaranteed. We identify, via the notion of presentation of a signature, a large class of signatures that do generate a syntax. Our (presentable) signatures subsume classical algebraic signatures (i.e., signatures for languages with variable binding, such as the pure lambda calculus) and extend them to include several other significant examples of syntactic constructions. One key feature of our notions of signature, syntax, and presentation is that they are highly compositional, in the sense that complex examples can be obtained by assembling simpler ones. Moreover, through the Initial Semantics approach, our framework provides, beyond the desired algebra of terms, a well-behaved substitution and the induction and recursion principles associated to the syntax. This paper builds upon ideas from a previous attempt by Hirschowitz-Maggesi, which, in turn, was directly inspired by some earlier work of Ghani-Uustalu-Hamana and Matthes-Uustalu. The main results presented in the paper are computer-checked within the UniMath system.Comment: v2: extended version of the article as published in CSL 2018 (http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2018.4); list of changes given in Section 1.5 of the paper; v3: small corrections throughout the paper, no major change

No-Go Theorems for Distributive Laws

Monads are commonplace in computer science, and can be composed using Beck's distributive laws. Unfortunately, finding distributive laws can be extremely difficult and error-prone. The literature contains some general principles for constructing distributive laws. However, until now there have been no such techniques for establishing when no distributive law exists. We present three families of theorems for showing when there can be no distributive law between two monads. The first widely generalizes a counterexample attributed to Plotkin. It covers all the previous known no-go results for specific pairs of monads, and includes many new results. The second and third families are entirely novel, encompassing various new practical situations. For example, they negatively resolve the open question of whether the list monad distributes over itself, reveal a previously unobserved error in the literature, and confirm a conjecture made by Beck himself in his first paper on distributive laws. In addition, we establish conditions under which there can be at most one possible distributive law between two monads, proving various known distributive laws to be unique.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1811.0646

Monad Composition via Preservation of Algebras

Monads are a central object of category theory and constitute crucial tools for many areas of Computer Science, from semantics of computation to functional programming. An important aspect of monads is their correspondence with algebraic theories (their ‘presentation’). As demonstrated by the history of this field, composing monads is a challenging task: the literature contains numerous mistakes and features no general method. One categorical construct, named ‘distributive law’ allows this composition, but its existence is not guaranteed. This thesis addresses the question of monad composition by presenting a method for the construction of distributive laws. For this purpose, we introduce a notion of preservation of algebraic features: considering an arbitrary algebra for the theory presenting a monad S, we examine whether its structure is preserved when applying another monad T . In the case of success, it allows us to construct a distributive law and to compose our monads into T S. In order to develop a general framework, we focus on the class of monoidal monads. If T is monoidal, the algebraic operations presenting S are preserved in a canonical fashion; it remains to examine whether the equations presenting S are also preserved by T . As it turns out, the preservation of an equation depends on the layout of its variables: if each variable appears once on each side, the considered equation is automatically preserved by a monoidal monad. On the other hand, if a variable is duplicated or only appears on one side, preservation is not systematic. The main results of this thesis connect the preservation of such equations with structural properties of monads. In the case where T does not preserve an equation presenting S, our distributive law cannot be built; we provide a series of methods to slightly modify our monads and overcome this issue, and we investigate some less conventional distributive laws. Finally, we consider the presentations of both S and T and revisit our construction of distributive laws, this time with an algebraic point of view. Overall, this thesis presents a general approach to the problem of monad composition by relating categorical properties of monads with preservation of algebras