1,551 research outputs found

    The combined effects of rivers and refugia generate extreme cryptic fragmentation within the common ground skink (Scincella lateralis)

    Get PDF
    Rivers can act as both islands of mesic refugia for terrestrial organisms during times of aridification and barriers to gene flow, though evidence for long-term isolation by rivers is mixed. Understanding the extent to which riverine barrier effects can be heightened for populations trapped in mesic refugia can help explain maintenance and generation of diversity in the face of Pleistocene climate change. Herein, we implement phylogenetic and population genetic approaches to investigate the phylogeographic structure and history of the ground skink, Scincella lateralis, using mtDNA and eight nuclear loci. We then test several predictions of a river-refugia model of diversification. We recover 14 well-resolved mtDNA lineages distributed east-west along the Gulf Coast with a subset of lineages extending northward. In contrast, ncDNA exhibits limited phylogenetic structure or congruence among loci. However, multilocus population structure is broadly congruent with mtDNA patterns and suggests that deep coalescence rather than differential gene flow is responsible for mtDNA-ncDNA discordance. The observed patterns suggest that most lineages originated from population vicariance due to riverine barriers strengthened during the Plio-Pleistocene by a climate-induced coastal distribution. Diversification due to rivers is likely a special case, contingent upon other environmental or biological factors that reinforce riverine barrier effects. ยฉ 2009 The Society for the Study of Evolution

    ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜• ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณ ์† ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์—ผ๊ธฐ์„œ์—ด ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์•” ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง์ „๊ณต, 2019. 2. ๊ถŒ์„ฑํ›ˆ.์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธํ•ด NGS ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์กฐ์งํ•™์  ์ •๋ณด์™€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์„ธํฌ ํ˜น์€ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ง์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ ์†์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” PHLI- seq ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  PHLI-seq ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•” ์กฐ์ง์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ์ •๋ณด์™€ ์กฐ์งํ•™์  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์กฐ์ง์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ PHLI-seq ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„๋œ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ์ •๋ณด์™€ ์กฐ์งํ•™์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๋™ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋ฐฉ์•” ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์œ ์ „์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋‚œ์†Œ์•”์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ PHLI-seq ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•”์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ง„ํ–‰์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์•” ์„ธํฌ๋“ค์˜ ์„œ๋ธŒํด๋ก  ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ ์ธ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์ด ์•” ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์— ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.Despite advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, it has been challenging to map molecular information of cells to their tissue context due to technical limitations. In this dissertation, I describe PHLI-seq, a novel approach that enables high-throughput isolation and genome-wide sequence analysis of single-cells or small numbers of cells from a tissue to construct genomic maps within biological samples in relation to the images or phenotypes of the cells. By applying PHLI-seq to breast cancer tissues, genetic heterogeneity of cancer is revealed at a high spatial resolution. Also, in a case of ovarian cancer, a history of tumor development is explored using PHLI-seq. Through these studies, it is concluded that genetic subclonality and spatial separation of the subclones are formed in early stage of cancer development.Table of Contents Abstract____________________________________________________ i List of Figures ______________________________________________ iv List of Tables_______________________________________________ xi Chapter 1 Introduction _______________________________________ 1 1.1 Identifying Molecular Information of Cells ____________________ 3 1.2 Spatially Resolved Sequencing of Cells_______________________ 6 1.3 Comparison of Technologies _______________________________ 7 Chapter 2 Techical Overview of PHLI-seq ______________________ 11 2.1 Phenotype-based High-throughput Laser-aided Isolation and Sequencing (PHLI-seq) _____________________________________ 12 2.2 Instrumentation_________________________________________ 14 2.3 Whole Genome Amplification _____________________________ 20 2.4 Performance Validation of PHLI-seq________________________ 28 2.5 Performance Comparison with Commercial Laser Microdissection 36 Chapter 3 Spatially Resolved Sequencing of Breast Cancer ________ 42 3.1 PHLI-seq Analysis of a HER2 Positive Breast Tumor___________ 43 3.1.1 Experimental Procedure ______________________________ 43 3.1.2 Somatic Copy Number Alteration (CNA) Analysis _________ 45 3.1.3 Somatic Single Nucleotide Variant (SNV) Analysis_________ 50 3.1.4 Inferring Tumor Evolution ____________________________ 57 3.2 PHLI-seq Analysis of a Triple-negative Breast Tumor __________ 60 3.3 A Summary____________________________________________ 65 Chapter 4 Inferring Tumor Evolution of Ovarian Cancer__________ 67 4.1 Sample Preparation______________________________________ 70 4.2 Somatic CNA and SNV Analysis___________________________ 73 4.3 Inferring Evolutionary Trajectory of the Tumor Cells ___________ 80 4.4 A Summary____________________________________________ 85 Chapter 5 Conclusion________________________________________ 87 Bibliography _______________________________________________ 90 Abstract in Korean _________________________________________ 100Docto

    The empirical replicability of task-based fMRI as a function of sample size

    Get PDF
    Replicating results (i.e. obtaining consistent results using a new independent dataset) is an essential part of good science. As replicability has consequences for theories derived from empirical studies, it is of utmost importance to better understand the underlying mechanisms influencing it. A popular tool for non-invasive neuroimaging studies is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While the effect of underpowered studies is well documented, the empirical assessment of the interplay between sample size and replicability of results for task-based fMRI studies remains limited. In this work, we extend existing work on this assessment in two ways. Firstly, we use a large database of 1400 subjects performing four types of tasks from the IMAGEN project to subsample a series of independent samples of increasing size. Secondly, replicability is evaluated using a multi-dimensional framework consisting of 3 different measures: (un)conditional test-retest reliability, coherence and stability. We demonstrate not only a positive effect of sample size, but also a trade-off between spatial resolution and replicability. When replicability is assessed voxelwise or when observing small areas of activation, a larger sample size than typically used in fMRI is required to replicate results. On the other hand, when focussing on clusters of voxels, we observe a higher replicability. In addition, we observe variability in the size of clusters of activation between experimental paradigms or contrasts of parameter estimates within these

    Leveraging variational autoencoders for multiple data imputation

    Full text link
    Missing data persists as a major barrier to data analysis across numerous applications. Recently, deep generative models have been used for imputation of missing data, motivated by their ability to capture highly non-linear and complex relationships in the data. In this work, we investigate the ability of deep models, namely variational autoencoders (VAEs), to account for uncertainty in missing data through multiple imputation strategies. We find that VAEs provide poor empirical coverage of missing data, with underestimation and overconfident imputations, particularly for more extreme missing data values. To overcome this, we employ ฮฒ\beta-VAEs, which viewed from a generalized Bayes framework, provide robustness to model misspecification. Assigning a good value of ฮฒ\beta is critical for uncertainty calibration and we demonstrate how this can be achieved using cross-validation. In downstream tasks, we show how multiple imputation with ฮฒ\beta-VAEs can avoid false discoveries that arise as artefacts of imputation.Comment: 17 pages, 3 main figures, 6 supplementary figure
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore