The Argyris isogeometric space on unstructured multi-patch planar domains

Multi-patch spline parametrizations are used in geometric design and isogeometric analysis to represent complex domains. We deal with a particular class of $C^0$ planar multi-patch spline parametrizations called analysis-suitable $G^1$ (AS-$G^{1}$) multi-patch parametrizations (Collin, Sangalli, Takacs; CAGD, 2016). This class of parametrizations has to satisfy specific geometric continuity constraints, and is of importance since it allows to construct, on the multi-patch domain, $C^1$ isogeometric spaces with optimal approximation properties. It was demonstrated in (Kapl, Sangalli, Takacs; CAD, 2018) that AS-$G^1$ multi-patch parametrizations are suitable for modeling complex planar multi-patch domains. In this work, we construct a basis, and an associated dual basis, for a specific $C^1$ isogeometric spline space $\mathcal{W}$ over a given AS-$G^1$ multi-patch parametrization. We call the space $\mathcal{W}$ the Argyris isogeometric space, since it is $C^1$ across interfaces and $C^2$ at all vertices and generalizes the idea of Argyris finite elements to tensor-product splines. The considered space $\mathcal{W}$ is a subspace of the entire $C^1$ isogeometric space $\mathcal{V}^{1}$, which maintains the reproduction properties of traces and normal derivatives along the interfaces. Moreover, it reproduces all derivatives up to second order at the vertices. In contrast to $\mathcal{V}^{1}$, the dimension of $\mathcal{W}$ does not depend on the domain parametrization, and $\mathcal{W}$ admits a basis and dual basis which possess a simple explicit representation and local support. We conclude the paper with some numerical experiments, which exhibit the optimal approximation order of the Argyris isogeometric space $\mathcal{W}$ and demonstrate the applicability of our approach for isogeometric analysis

Isogeometric FEM-BEM coupled structural-acoustic analysis of shells using subdivision surfaces

We introduce a coupled finite and boundary element formulation for acoustic scattering analysis over thin shell structures. A triangular Loop subdivision surface discretisation is used for both geometry and analysis fields. The Kirchhoff-Love shell equation is discretised with the finite element method and the Helmholtz equation for the acoustic field with the boundary element method. The use of the boundary element formulation allows the elegant handling of infinite domains and precludes the need for volumetric meshing. In the present work the subdivision control meshes for the shell displacements and the acoustic pressures have the same resolution. The corresponding smooth subdivision basis functions have the $C^1$ continuity property required for the Kirchhoff-Love formulation and are highly efficient for the acoustic field computations. We validate the proposed isogeometric formulation through a closed-form solution of acoustic scattering over a thin shell sphere. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of the proposed approach to handle complex geometries with arbitrary topology that provides an integrated isogeometric design and analysis workflow for coupled structural-acoustic analysis of shells

Construction of analysis-suitable G1G^1 planar multi-patch parameterizations

Isogeometric analysis allows to define shape functions of global $C^{1}$ continuity (or of higher continuity) over multi-patch geometries. The construction of such $C^{1}$-smooth isogeometric functions is a non-trivial task and requires particular multi-patch parameterizations, so-called analysis-suitable $G^{1}$ (in short, AS-$G^{1}$) parameterizations, to ensure that the resulting $C^{1}$ isogeometric spaces possess optimal approximation properties, cf. [7]. In this work, we show through examples that it is possible to construct AS-$G^{1}$ multi-patch parameterizations of planar domains, given their boundary. More precisely, given a generic multi-patch geometry, we generate an AS-$G^{1}$ multi-patch parameterization possessing the same boundary, the same vertices and the same first derivatives at the vertices, and which is as close as possible to this initial geometry. Our algorithm is based on a quadratic optimization problem with linear side constraints. Numerical tests also confirm that $C^{1}$ isogeometric spaces over AS-$G^{1}$ multi-patch parameterized domains converge optimally under mesh refinement, while for generic parameterizations the convergence order is severely reduced

Automation of isogeometric formulation and efficiency consideration

This paper deals with automation of the isogeometric finite element formulation. Isogeometric finite element is implemented in AceGen environment, which enables symbolic formulation of the element code and the expressions are automatically opti- mized. The automated code is tested for objectivity regarding numerical efficiency in a numeric test with the Cooke membrane. This test shows that automatic code generation optimizes the isogeometric quadrilateral element with linear Bezier splines to the degree of only twelve percent overhead against standard displacement quadrilateral element of four nodes. Additionaly, the automated isogeometric element code is tested on a set of standard benchmark test cases to further test the accurancy and efficiency of the pre- sented isogeometric implementation. The isogeometric displacement brick element with quadratic Bezier splines is in all tests compared to a collection of standard displacement element formulations and a selection of EAS elements. The presented results show su- perior behaviour of the isogeometric displacement brick element with quadratic Bezier splines for coarse meshes and best convergence rate with mesh refinement in most test cases. Despite all optimization of the element code the biggest disadvantage of the isogeo- metric model remains the time cost of the isogeometric analysis. Thus, when considering the ratio between solution error and solution time, the use of stable EAS elements, likeTSCG12, remains preferable