Selecting fault revealing mutants

Mutant selection refers to the problem of choosing, among a large number of mutants, the (few) ones that should be used by the testers. In view of this, we investigate the problem of selecting the fault revealing mutants, i.e., the mutants that are killable and lead to test cases that uncover unknown program faults. We formulate two variants of this problem: the fault revealing mutant selection and the fault revealing mutant prioritization. We argue and show that these problems can be tackled through a set of ‘static’ program features and propose a machine learning approach, named FaRM, that learns to select and rank killable and fault revealing mutants. Experimental results involving 1,692 real faults show the practical benefits of our approach in both examined problems. Our results show that FaRM achieves a good trade-off between application cost and effectiveness (measured in terms of faults revealed). We also show that FaRM outperforms all the existing mutant selection methods, i.e., the random mutant sampling, the selective mutation and defect prediction (mutating the code areas pointed by defect prediction). In particular, our results show that with respect to mutant selection, our approach reveals 23% to 34% more faults than any of the baseline methods, while, with respect to mutant prioritization, it achieves higher average percentage of revealed faults with a median difference between 4% and 9% (from the random mutant orderings)

Selecting fault revealing mutants

Mutant selection refers to the problem of choosing, among a large number of mutants, the (few) ones that should be used by the testers. In view of this, we investigate the problem of selecting the fault revealing mutants, i.e., the mutants that are killable and lead to test cases that uncover unknown program faults. We formulate two variants of this problem: the fault revealing mutant selection and the fault revealing mutant prioritization. We argue and show that these problems can be tackled through a set of ‘static’ program features and propose a machine learning approach, named FaRM, that learns to select and rank killable and fault revealing mutants. Experimental results involving 1,692 real faults show the practical benefits of our approach in both examined problems. Our results show that FaRM achieves a good trade-off between application cost and effectiveness (measured in terms of faults revealed). We also show that FaRM outperforms all the existing mutant selection methods, i.e., the random mutant sampling, the selective mutation and defect prediction (mutating the code areas pointed by defect prediction). In particular, our results show that with respect to mutant selection, our approach reveals 23% to 34% more faults than any of the baseline methods, while, with respect to mutant prioritization, it achieves higher average percentage of revealed faults with a median difference between 4% and 9% (from the random mutant orderings)

Increasing Software Reliability using Mutation Testing and Machine Learning

Mutation testing is a type of software testing proposed in the 1970s where program statements are deliberately changed to introduce simple errors so that test cases can be validated to determine if they can detect the errors. The goal of mutation testing was to reduce complex program errors by preventing the related simple errors. Test cases are executed against the mutant code to determine if one fails, detects the error and ensures the program is correct. One major issue with this type of testing was it became intensive computationally to generate and test all possible mutations for complex programs. This dissertation used machine learning for the selection of mutation operators that reduced the computational cost of testing and improved test suite effectiveness. The goals were to produce mutations that were more resistant to test cases, improve test case evaluation, validate then improve the test suite’s effectiveness, realize cost reductions by generating fewer mutations for testing and improving software reliability by detecting more errors. To accomplish these goals, experiments were conducted using sample programs to determine how well the reinforcement learning based algorithm performed with one live mutation, multiple live mutations and no live mutations. The experiments, measured by mutation score, were used to update the algorithm and improved accuracy for predictions. The performance was then evaluated on multiple processor computers. One key result from this research was the development of a reinforcement algorithm to identify mutation operator combinations that resulted in live mutants. During experimentation, the reinforcement learning algorithm identified the optimal mutation operator selections for various programs and test suite scenarios, as well as determined that by using parallel processing and multiple cores the reinforcement learning process for mutation operator selection was practical. With reinforcement learning the mutation operators utilized were reduced by 50 – 100%.In conclusion, these improvements created a ‘live’ mutation testing process that evaluated various mutation operators and generated mutants to perform real-time mutation testing while dynamically prioritizing mutation operator recommendations. This has enhanced the software developer’s ability to improve testing processes. The contributions of this paper’s research supported the shift-left testing approach, where testing is performed earlier in the software development cycle when error resolution is less costly

A Fault-Based Model of Fault Localization Techniques

Every day, ordinary people depend on software working properly. We take it for granted; from banking software, to railroad switching software, to flight control software, to software that controls medical devices such as pacemakers or even gas pumps, our lives are touched by software that we expect to work. It is well known that the main technique/activity used to ensure the quality of software is testing. Often it is the only quality assurance activity undertaken, making it that much more important. In a typical experiment studying these techniques, a researcher will intentionally seed a fault (intentionally breaking the functionality of some source code) with the hopes that the automated techniques under study will be able to identify the fault\u27s location in the source code. These faults are picked arbitrarily; there is potential for bias in the selection of the faults. Previous researchers have established an ontology for understanding or expressing this bias called fault size. This research captures the fault size ontology in the form of a probabilistic model. The results of applying this model to measure fault size suggest that many faults generated through program mutation (the systematic replacement of source code operators to create faults) are very large and easily found. Secondary measures generated in the assessment of the model suggest a new static analysis method, called testability, for predicting the likelihood that code will contain a fault in the future. While software testing researchers are not statisticians, they nonetheless make extensive use of statistics in their experiments to assess fault localization techniques. Researchers often select their statistical techniques without justification. This is a very worrisome situation because it can lead to incorrect conclusions about the significance of research. This research introduces an algorithm, MeansTest, which helps automate some aspects of the selection of appropriate statistical techniques. The results of an evaluation of MeansTest suggest that MeansTest performs well relative to its peers. This research then surveys recent work in software testing using MeansTest to evaluate the significance of researchers\u27 work. The results of the survey indicate that software testing researchers are underreporting the significance of their work

Synthetic Gene Circuits: Design with Directed Evolution

Synthetic circuits offer great promise for generating insights into nature's underlying design principles or forward engineering novel biotechnology applications. However, construction of these circuits is not straightforward. Synthetic circuits generally consist of components optimized to function in their natural context, not in the context of the synthetic circuit. Combining mathematical modeling with directed evolution offers one promising means for addressing this problem. Modeling identifies mutational targets and limits the evolutionary search space for directed evolution, which alters circuit performance without the need for detailed biophysical information. This review examines strategies for integrating modeling and directed evolution and discusses the utility and limitations of available methods

The Effectiveness of <i>t</i>-Way Test Data Generation

Modern society is increasingly dependent on the correct functioning of software and increasingly so in areas that are considered safety related or safety critical. Therefore, there is an increasing need to be able to verify and validate that the software is in fact correct and will perform its intended function. Many approaches to this problem have been proposed; however, none seems likely to supplant the role of testing in the near future. If we accept that there is, and will be, a continuing need to be able to test software then the question becomes one of how can this be done effectively, both in terms of ability to detect errors and in terms of cost. One avenue of research that offers prospects of improving both of these aspects is the automatic generation of test data. There has recently been a large amount of work conducted in this area. One particularly promising direction has been the application of ideas from the field of experimental design and in particular, the field of t-way adequate factorial designs. The area however, is not without issues; there is evidence that the technique is capable of detecting errors but that evidence is not unequivocal. Moreover, as with almost all work in the area of automatic test generation, there has been very little comparative work comparing the technique with other test data generation techniques. Worse, there has been effectively no work done that compares any automatic test data generation technique with the effectiveness of tests generated by humans. Another major issue with the technique is the number of tests that applying the technique can result in. This implies that there is a need for an automated oracle if the technique is to be successfully applied. The flaw with this is of course that in most situations the oracle is the human that is conducting the tests, a point often ignored in testing research. The work presented here addresses both of these points. To do this I have used a code base taken from an industrial engine control system that has an existing set of high quality unit tests developed by hand. To complement this, several other techniques for automatically generating test data have been applied, namely random testing, random experimental designs and a technique for generating single factor experiments. To address the issue of being able to compare the error detection ability of all of the sets of test vectors, rather than the usual effectiveness surrogates of code coverage I have used mutation analysis on the code base to directly measure the ability of each set of test vectors to discover common coding errors. The results presented here show that test data generation techniques based on t-way factorial designs are at least as effective as handgenerated tests and superior to random testing and the factor experimental technique. The oracle problem associated with the factorial design techniques was addressed using a test set minimisation approach. The mutation tool monitored which vectors could “kill” which code mutants. After a subset of the test vectors had been run, the most effective vectors were retained and the rest discarded. Likewise, mutants that were killed were removed from further consideration and the process repeated. Experimental results show that this minimisation procedure is effective at reducing computational overhead and is capable of producing final sets of test vectors that are comparable in size with the sets of hand-generated tests and so amenable to final hand checking

Optimal Ship Maintenance Scheduling Under Restricted Conditions and Constrained Resources

The research presented in this dissertation addresses the application of evolution algorithms, i.e. Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Differential Evolution algorithm (DE) to scheduling problems in the presence of restricted conditions and resource limitations. This research is motivated by the scheduling of engineering design tasks in shop scheduling problems and ship maintenance scheduling problems to minimize total completion time. The thesis consists of two major parts; the first corresponds to the first appended paper and deals with the computational complexity of mixed shop scheduling problems. A modified Genetic algorithm is proposed to solve the problem. Computational experiments, conducted to evaluate its performance against known optimal solutions for different sized problems, show its superiority in computation time and the high applicability in practical mixed shop scheduling problems. The second part considers the major theme in the second appended paper and is related to the ship maintenance scheduling problem and the extended research on the multi-mode resource-constrained ship scheduling problem. A heuristic Differential Evolution is developed and applied to solve these problems. A mathematical optimization model is also formulated for the multi-mode resource-constrained ship scheduling problem. Through the computed results, DE proves its effectiveness and efficiency in addressing both single and multi-objective ship maintenance scheduling problem