The Golden Point of No-Scale and No-Parameter F{\cal F}-SU(5)

The ${\cal F}$-lipped $SU(5)\times U(1)_X$ Grand Unified Theory (GUT) supplemented by TeV-scale vector-like particles from ${\cal F}$-theory, together dubbed ${\cal F}$-SU(5), offers a natural multi-phase unification process which suggests an elegant implementation of the No-Scale Supergravity boundary conditions at the unification scale $M_{\cal F} \simeq 7 \times 10^{17}$ GeV. Enforcing the No-Scale boundary conditions, including $B_\mu(M_{\cal F})=0$ on the Higgs bilinear soft term, with the precision 7-year WMAP value on the dark matter relic density isolates a highly constrained "golden point" located near $M_{1/2} = 455$ GeV and $\tan \beta = 15$ in the $\tan\beta-M_{1/2}$ plane, which simultaneously satisfies all known experiments, and moreover corresponds to an imminently observable proton decay rate. Because the universal gaugino mass is actually determined from established low energy data via Renormalization Group Equation (RGE) running, there are no surviving arbitrary scale parameters in the present model.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures, PRD Versio

A Complete Theory of Everything (will be subjective)

Increasingly encompassing models have been suggested for our world. Theories range from generally accepted to increasingly speculative to apparently bogus. The progression of theories from ego- to geo- to helio-centric models to universe and multiverse theories and beyond was accompanied by a dramatic increase in the sizes of the postulated worlds, with humans being expelled from their center to ever more remote and random locations. Rather than leading to a true theory of everything, this trend faces a turning point after which the predictive power of such theories decreases (actually to zero). Incorporating the location and other capacities of the observer into such theories avoids this problem and allows to distinguish meaningful from predictively meaningless theories. This also leads to a truly complete theory of everything consisting of a (conventional objective) theory of everything plus a (novel subjective) observer process. The observer localization is neither based on the controversial anthropic principle, nor has it anything to do with the quantum-mechanical observation process. The suggested principle is extended to more practical (partial, approximate, probabilistic, parametric) world models (rather than theories of everything). Finally, I provide a justification of Ockham's razor, and criticize the anthropic principle, the doomsday argument, the no free lunch theorem, and the falsifiability dogma.Comment: 26 LaTeX page

Minimal Gaugino Mediation

We propose Minimal Gaugino Mediation as the simplest known solution to the supersymmetric flavor and CP problems. The framework predicts a very minimal structure for the soft parameters at ultra-high energies: gaugino masses are unified and non-vanishing whereas all other soft supersymmetry breaking parameters vanish. We show that this boundary condition naturally arises from a small extra dimension and present a complete model which includes a new extra-dimensional solution to the mu problem. We briefly discuss the predicted superpartner spectrum as a function of the two parameters of the model. The commonly ignored renormalization group evolution above the GUT scale is crucial to the viability of Minimal Gaugino Mediation but does not introduce new model dependence.Comment: LaTeX, 16 pages, 4 figures, running of the bottom and tau Yukawas included, plots revise

A Formal Measure of Machine Intelligence

A fundamental problem in artificial intelligence is that nobody really knows what intelligence is. The problem is especially acute when we need to consider artificial systems which are significantly different to humans. In this paper we approach this problem in the following way: We take a number of well known informal definitions of human intelligence that have been given by experts, and extract their essential features. These are then mathematically formalised to produce a general measure of intelligence for arbitrary machines. We believe that this measure formally captures the concept of machine intelligence in the broadest reasonable sense.Comment: 8 two-column page