An investigation into the role of a wiki in supporting collaborative learning activities

Providing students with learning opportunities based on real-life situations has beenfound to enhance student learning. With this aim, two Open University post-graduatecourses introduced collaborative activities modelled on workplace situations. Theactivities employed wikis: a lightweight, web-based collaborative authoringenvironment. The purpose of this research has been to investigate the role of a wiki insupporting the collaborative learning activities, and to assess how the wiki influencedstudent engagement with the activities.The dissertation draws data from the three presentations of Open University courses’56 wikis produced by almost 240 students. The base data includes wiki content andstudent discussions. Issues identified in the base data were further explored throughpost-course questionnaires and interviews. An iterative inductive qualitative analysiswas applied to analyse students' perceptions and experiences with the wikis. Activitytheory was used to place these within the context of the activities.The wikis enabled all student groups to author collaboratively the documents requiredby their courses. Writing the documents benefited the students because it prompteddiscussion and personal reflection; both of which many students reported as enhancingtheir learning. The students particularly valued the wiki’s role as a central repositorythat helped them achieve these two benefits. The research shows that wikis cansupport collaborative activities among students and lead to enhanced learningopportunities. The key findings suggest that a wiki’s simplicity enabled students toengage easily with the collaborative learning activities. However, a wiki’s lack ofinherent structure hindered their progress until they had worked out how to organisetheir use of the wiki. The insights from the research are presented as guidelines for educators intending toincorporate wiki supported collaborative learning activities into their courses. Theguidelines have two aims: first, to help educators facilitate speedy induction andparticipation of the students in the collaborative activities; second, to ensure the wiki isused effectively by students to increase their collaborative learning opportunities

Κατηγοριοποίηση και περιληπτικές αποδόσεις εργασιών συνεδρίων της ACM SIGCSE

Η παρούσα εργασία αφορά στη μελέτη εργασιών οι οποίες παρουσιάστηκαν στο συνέδριο ACM SIGCSE τις χρονιές 2016, 2017 και 2018. Αρχικά, γίνεται μια κατηγοριοποίηση, με βάση τον κύριο τομέα της Εκπαίδευσης της Πληροφορικής τον οποίο αφορά η κάθε εργασία που παρουσιάστηκε στα προαναφερθέντα συνέδρια. Οι κατηγορίες στις οποίες κατατάχθηκαν τα άρθρα είναι οι εξής: • Αξιολόγηση σπουδαστών • Ασφάλεια και προστασία της ιδιωτικής ζωής • Διαδραστικά περιβάλλοντα μάθησης • Διαφορετικότητα των φύλων/ Πολυπολιτισμικότητα • Εκπαίδευση της Μηχανικής Λογισμικού • Εισαγωγή στην Πληροφορική • Εκπαίδευση της Πληροφορικής • Ενσωμάτωση Πληροφορίας • Ηλεκτρονική μάθηση • Οπτικοποίηση • Πρότυπα αναλυτικά προγράμματα • Πρωτοβάθμια και Δευτεροβάθμια Εκπαίδευση • Συνεργατική Μάθηση • Συστήματα διαχείρισης μάθησης • Υπολογιστική Σκέψη • Υπολογιστικός Αλφαβητισμός Στη συνέχεια, δίνονται περιληπτικές αποδόσεις των εργασιών της χρονιάς 2017 που εμπίπτουν στις παρακάτω επιλεγμένες κατηγορίες: • Αξιολόγηση φοιτητών/μαθητών • Εισαγωγή στην Πληροφορική • Εκπαίδευση της Πληροφορικής • Πρωτοβάθμια και Δευτεροβάθμια Εκπαίδευση • Συνεργατική Μάθηση • Υπολογιστική ΣκέψηThis thesis focuses on the study of papers presented at the ACM SIGCSE conference in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. Initially, a categorization is defined, based on the main areas of IT education that are included in the aforementioned conferences. The categories in which the articles were classified are: • Student evaluation • Security and Privacy • Interactive learning environments • Gender Diversity / Multiculturalism • Software engineering education • CS1 • Computer Science Education • Integration of Information • E-learning • Visualization • Model curricula • K-12 • Collaborative learning • Computational Thinking • Computing Literacy Afterwards, reviews of the papers of the year 2017 are presented concerning the following categories: • Student evaluation • CS1 • Computer Science Education • K-12 • Collaborative learning • Computational Thinkin

Promoting Andean children's learning of science through cultural and digital tools

Conference Theme: To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scaleIn Peru, there is a large achievement gap in rural schools. In order to overcome this problem, the study aims to design environments that enhance science learning through the integration of ICT with cultural artifacts, respecting the Andean culture and empower rural children to pursue lifelong learning. This investigation employs the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) framework, and the Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology using an iterative process of design, implementation and evaluation of the innovative practice.published_or_final_versio

The Other Culture: Science and Mathematics Education in Honors

TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface — Dail W. Mullins, Jr. Introduction — Ellen B. Buckner and Keith Garbutt Section I: What is Science in Honors? Chapter 1: One Size Does Not Fit All: Science and Mathematics in Honors Programs and Colleges — Keith Garbutt Chapter 2: Encouraging Scientific Thinking and Student Development — Ellen B. Buckner Chapter 3: Information Literacy as a Co-requisite to Critical Thinking: A Librarian and Educator Partnership — Paul Mussleman and Ellen B. Buckner Section II: Science and Society Chapter 4: SENCER: Honors Science for All Honors Students — Mariah Birgen Chapter 5: Philosophy in the Service of Science: How Non-Science Honors Courses Can Use the Evolution-ID Controversy to Improve Scientific Literacy — Thi Lam Chapter 6: Recovering Controversy: Teaching Controversy in the Honors Science Classroom — Richard England Chapter 7: Science, Power, and Diversity: Bringing Science to Honors in an Interdisciplinary Format — Bonnie K. Baxter and Bridget M. Newell Section III: Science and Mathematics in Honors for the Non-Science Student Chapter 8: Honors Science for the Non-Science-Bound Student: Where Have We Gone Wrong? — Bradley R. Newcomer Chapter 9: Engaging the Honors Student in Lower-Division Mathematics, Minerva Cordero, Theresa Jorgensen, and Barbara A. Shipman Chapter 10: Statistics in Honors: Teaching Students to Separate Truth from “Damned Lies” — Lisa W. Kay Chapter 11: Is Honors General Chemistry Simply More Quantum Mechanics? — Joe L. March Section IV: Science in Honors for the Science Student Chapter 12: Communicating Science: An Approach to Teaching Technical Communication in a Science and Technology Honors Program . — Cynthia Ryan, Michele Gould, and Diane C. Tucker Chapter 13: Designing Independent Honors Projects in Mathematics — Minerva Cordero, Theresa Jorgensen, and Barbara A. Shipman Chapter 14: Honors Senior Theses Are ABET Friendly: Developing a Process to Meet Accreditation Requirements — Michael Doran Section V: Interdisciplinary Approaches in Honors Science Curricula Chapter 15: Interdisciplinary Science Curricula in Honors — Dail W. Mullins, Jr. Chapter 16: The Science of Humor: An Interdisciplinary Honors Course — Michael K. Cundall, Jr. Chapter 17: An Interdisciplinary Understanding of a Disease: Project for an Honors-Embedded Biochemistry Course — Kevin M. Williams Section VI: Thinking like a Scientist: A Toolkit Chapter 18: Replacing Appearance with Reality: What Should Distinguish Science in an Honors Program? — Larry J. Crockett Chapter 19: Confronting Pseudoscience: An Honors Course in Critical Thinking — Keith Garbutt Chapter 20: Science Education: The Perils of Scientific Illiteracy, the Promise of Science Education — Glenn M. Sanford Acknowledgements — Ellen B. Buckner and Keith Garbutt About the Author