UAS Integration in the NAS FY15 Annual Review

This presentation gives insight into the research activities and efforts being executed in order to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system. This briefing is to inform others of the UAS-NAS progress and future directions

UAS Integration in the NAS Project - FY 14 Annual Review

This briefing gives insight into the research activities and efforts being executed in order to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system. This briefing is to inform others of the UAS-NAS Projects progress and future directions

UAS Surveillance Criticality

The integration of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the national airspace system (NAS) poses considerable challenges. Maintaining human safety is perhaps chief among these challenges as UAS remote pilots will need to interact with other UAS, piloted aircraft, and other conditions associated with flight. A research team of 6 leading UAS research universities was formed to respond to a set of surveillance criticality research questions. Five analysis tools were selected following a literature review to evaluate airborne surveillance technology performance. The analysis tools included: Fault Trees, Monte Carlo Simulations, Hazard Analysis, Design of Experiments (DOE), and Human-in-the-Loop Simulations. The Surveillance Criticality research team used results from these analyses to address three primary research questions and provide recommendations for UAS detect-and-avoid mitigation and areas for further research

Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0

This Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 1.0 (“roadmap”) represents the culmination of the UASSC’s work to identify existing standards and standards in development, assess gaps, and make recommendations for priority areas where there is a perceived need for additional standardization and/or pre-standardization R&D. The roadmap has examined 64 issue areas, identified a total of 60 gaps and corresponding recommendations across the topical areas of airworthiness; flight operations (both general concerns and application-specific ones including critical infrastructure inspections, commercial services, and public safety operations); and personnel training, qualifications, and certification. Of that total, 40 gaps/recommendations have been identified as high priority, 17 as medium priority, and 3 as low priority. A “gap” means no published standard or specification exists that covers the particular issue in question. In 36 cases, additional R&D is needed. The hope is that the roadmap will be broadly adopted by the standards community and that it will facilitate a more coherent and coordinated approach to the future development of standards for UAS. To that end, it is envisioned that the roadmap will be widely promoted and discussed over the course of the coming year, to assess progress on its implementation and to identify emerging issues that require further elaboration

Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0

This Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0 (“roadmap”) is an update to version 1.0 of this document published in December 2018. It identifies existing standards and standards in development, assesses gaps, and makes recommendations for priority areas where there is a perceived need for additional standardization and/or pre-standardization R&D. The roadmap has examined 78 issue areas, identified a total of 71 open gaps and corresponding recommendations across the topical areas of airworthiness; flight operations (both general concerns and application-specific ones including critical infrastructure inspections, commercial services, and public safety operations); and personnel training, qualifications, and certification. Of that total, 47 gaps/recommendations have been identified as high priority, 21 as medium priority, and 3 as low priority. A “gap” means no published standard or specification exists that covers the particular issue in question. In 53 cases, additional R&D is needed. As with the earlier version of this document, the hope is that the roadmap will be broadly adopted by the standards community and that it will facilitate a more coherent and coordinated approach to the future development of standards for UAS. To that end, it is envisioned that the roadmap will continue to be promoted in the coming year. It is also envisioned that a mechanism may be established to assess progress on its implementation

Evaluation of remain well clear and collision avoidance for drones

One of the cornerstones that should enable inserting unmanned aircraft into the airspace is the development of Detect and Avoid (DAA) systems. DAA systems will improve the Remote Pilot (RP) situational awareness by means of electronic conspicuity devices, providing them with the necessary means to Remain Well Clear (RWC) from other traffic and, if necessary, avoid Mid-Air collisions (MAC). DAA systems will compensate for the loss of a pilot on board, which drastically reduces the capacity to keep a safe separation from traffic, making current Rules of the Air very challenging to achieve. Given the growing popularity of drone operations for commercial and recreational purposes, new standards should include them in the not-too-distant future. Since current DAA standards and algorithms (DO-365 and ED-258) are being developed targeting large, mostly military Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS), this project proposes a new set of detection volumes and alert thresholds for U-Space users according to an aircraft type classification. This will allow adapting the existing DAA algorithms to small drones, complying with the new European framework of services and applications for drones (U-Space). Because testing new safety nets (such as new DAA algorithms) on real aircraft would be dangerous and inadequate, radar reports and computer-based simulations allow for a risk-free and faster evaluation of safety net performances. Due to the current lack of real drone radar tracks, this project has developed a multi-rotor drone encounter generator tool (called DEG). This software is able to generate a large number of synthetic pairwise quadcopter drone conflict tracks, simulating the instant prior to a MAC. The way trajectories are generated by DEG strongly depends on the type of operation being flown (inspection/surveillance flights and logistic flights) and the aircraft type (including a DJI F450 and a faster version called DJI F450 FAST). The results of this project include a drone conflict trajectory example generated with DEG and an investigation of the performance and effectiveness of the DEG tool using a tailored existing DAA algorithm (DAIDALUS).Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::9 - Indústria, Innovació i Infraestructur

Analysis and Simulation of the Simplified Aircraft-Based Paired Approach Concept With the ALAS Alerting Algorithm in Conjunction With Echelon and Offset Strategies

This report presents analytical and simulation results of an investigation into proposed operational concepts for closely spaced parallel runways, including the Simplified Aircraft-based Paired Approach (SAPA) with alerting and an escape maneuver, MITRE?s echelon spacing and no escape maneuver, and a hybrid concept aimed at lowering the visibility minima. We found that the SAPA procedure can be used at 950 ft separations or higher with next-generation avionics and that 1150 ft separations or higher is feasible with current-rule compliant ADS-B OUT. An additional 50 ft reduction in runway separation for the SAPA procedure is possible if different glideslopes are used. For the echelon concept we determined that current generation aircraft cannot conduct paired approaches on parallel paths using echelon spacing on runways less than 1400 ft apart and next-generation aircraft will not be able to conduct paired approach on runways less than 1050 ft apart. The hybrid concept added alerting and an escape maneuver starting 1 NM from the threshold when flying the echelon concept. This combination was found to be effective, but the probability of a collision can be seriously impacted if the turn component of the escape maneuver has to be disengaged near the ground (e.g. 300 ft or below) due to airport buildings and surrounding terrain. We also found that stabilizing the approach path in the straight-in segment was only possible if the merge point was at least 1.5 to 2 NM from the threshold unless the total system error can be sufficiently constrained on the offset path and final turn

Assuring safety through operational approval : challenges in assessing and approving the safety of systems-level changes in air transportation

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, February 2010."September 2009." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 135-143).To improve capacity and efficiency of the air transportation system, a number of new systems-level changes have been proposed. Key aspects of the proposed changes are combined functionality across technology and procedures and large physical scale of deployment. The objective of this work is to examine the current safety assessment processes for systems-level changes and to develop an understanding of key challenges and implications for the assessment and approval of future systems-level changes. From an investigation of current U.S. and international safety regulatory policies and processes, a general model was created describing key processes supporting operational approval. Within this model, a framework defined as an influence matrix was developed to analyze key decisions regarding the required scope of analysis in safety assessment. The influence matrix represents the expected change in levels of risk due to changes in behavior of elements of a system. It is used to evaluate the appropriate scope of analysis in safety assessment. Three approaches to performing safety assessment of systems-level changes were analyzed using the framework: the risk matrix approach, target level of safety approach, and performance-based approach. Case studies were performed using eight implemented and pending systems-level changes. In this work, challenges expected in safety assessment of future systems-level changes were identified. Challenges include the large scope of proposed changes, which drives a need for a broad and deep scope of analysis, including the multiple hazards and conditions and complex interactions between components of a change and the external system. In addition, it can be expected that high safety expectations will increase the required accuracy of models and underlying data used in safety assessment. Fundamentally new operational concepts are also expected to expand the required scope of safety assessment, and a need to interface with legacy systems will limit achievable operations. The large scope of analysis expected for future changes will require new methods to manage scope of safety assessment, and insights into potential approaches are discussed.by Roland Everett Weibel.Ph.D

Spartan Daily, September 18, 1987

Volume 89, Issue 13https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/7605/thumbnail.jp

Environmental performance indicators in industrial management systems

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Engineering and awarded by Brunel University.Measuring the Environmental Performance of industry is an essential element in the movement to minimise the impact that industry has on the environment. There has been a significant increase in interest in this area over the last few years, however it is recognised that the available literature still tends towards the conceptual and theoretical and there is little practical advice for a business wishing to undertake environmental performance measurement. This project has concentrated on the practical development of tools and techniques for measuring environmental performance in a large, complex engineering company, using LucasVarity as an example. The portfolio discusses the general trends and approaches in environmental performance measurement, explains the specific aspects developed in practice and their results. Finally, the general conclusions for industry are discussed