266,408 research outputs found
“Cultures as Toolboxes”: An Introduction to the Special Issue Focused on STEM
The Journal of Multicultural Affairs welcomes Dr. Anita Bright as a guest editor to lead a special issue on Science, Engineering, Technology, and Mathematics (STEM). Dr. Bright centers this special issue around one particularly simple, yet complex question, Is the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics multicultural
When is .999... less than 1?
We examine alternative interpretations of the symbol described as nought,
point, nine recurring. Is "an infinite number of 9s" merely a figure of speech?
How are such alternative interpretations related to infinite cardinalities? How
are they expressed in Lightstone's "semicolon" notation? Is it possible to
choose a canonical alternative interpretation? Should unital evaluation of the
symbol .999 . . . be inculcated in a pre-limit teaching environment? The
problem of the unital evaluation is hereby examined from the pre-R, pre-lim
viewpoint of the student.Comment: 28 page
On Constructive Axiomatic Method
In this last version of the paper one may find a critical overview of some
recent philosophical literature on Axiomatic Method and Genetic Method.Comment: 25 pages, no figure
A non-standard analysis of a cultural icon: The case of Paul Halmos
We examine Paul Halmos' comments on category theory, Dedekind cuts, devil
worship, logic, and Robinson's infinitesimals. Halmos' scepticism about
category theory derives from his philosophical position of naive set-theoretic
realism. In the words of an MAA biography, Halmos thought that mathematics is
"certainty" and "architecture" yet 20th century logic teaches us is that
mathematics is full of uncertainty or more precisely incompleteness. If the
term architecture meant to imply that mathematics is one great solid castle,
then modern logic tends to teach us the opposite lession, namely that the
castle is floating in midair. Halmos' realism tends to color his judgment of
purely scientific aspects of logic and the way it is practiced and applied. He
often expressed distaste for nonstandard models, and made a sustained effort to
eliminate first-order logic, the logicians' concept of interpretation, and the
syntactic vs semantic distinction. He felt that these were vague, and sought to
replace them all by his polyadic algebra. Halmos claimed that Robinson's
framework is "unnecessary" but Henson and Keisler argue that Robinson's
framework allows one to dig deeper into set-theoretic resources than is common
in Archimedean mathematics. This can potentially prove theorems not accessible
by standard methods, undermining Halmos' criticisms.
Keywords: Archimedean axiom; bridge between discrete and continuous
mathematics; hyperreals; incomparable quantities; indispensability; infinity;
mathematical realism; Robinson.Comment: 15 pages, to appear in Logica Universali
Recommended from our members
The Texas Mathematics Teachers' Bulletin, Volume XI, No. 1, edited by C.D. Rice
CONTENTS: Foreword by Editor (p.5) -- Algebra by T. U. Taylor (p.7) -- The Transition from High School to College by C. D. Rice (p.9) -- Learning to Talk by J. W. Calhoun (p.12) -- To Prospective Secondary School Teachers From Brown University (p.14) -- The German Gymnasium by C.D. Rice (p.16
- …