8,807 research outputs found
Composing features by managing inconsistent requirements
One approach to system development is to decompose the requirements into features and specify the individual features before composing them. A major limitation of deferring feature composition is that inconsistency between the solutions to individual features may not be uncovered early in the development, leading to unwanted feature interactions. Syntactic inconsistencies arising from the way software artefacts are described can be addressed by the use of explicit, shared, domain knowledge. However, behavioural inconsistencies are more challenging: they may occur within the requirements associated with two or more features as well as at the level of individual features. Whilst approaches exist that address behavioural inconsistencies at design time, these are overrestrictive in ruling out all possible conflicts and may weaken the requirements further than is desirable. In this paper, we present a lightweight approach to dealing with behavioural inconsistencies at run-time. Requirement Composition operators are introduced that specify a run-time prioritisation to be used on occurrence of a feature interaction. This prioritisation can be static or dynamic. Dynamic prioritisation favours some requirement according to some run-time criterion, for example, the extent to which it is already generating behaviour
Bounded Situation Calculus Action Theories
In this paper, we investigate bounded action theories in the situation
calculus. A bounded action theory is one which entails that, in every
situation, the number of object tuples in the extension of fluents is bounded
by a given constant, although such extensions are in general different across
the infinitely many situations. We argue that such theories are common in
applications, either because facts do not persist indefinitely or because the
agent eventually forgets some facts, as new ones are learnt. We discuss various
classes of bounded action theories. Then we show that verification of a
powerful first-order variant of the mu-calculus is decidable for such theories.
Notably, this variant supports a controlled form of quantification across
situations. We also show that through verification, we can actually check
whether an arbitrary action theory maintains boundedness.Comment: 51 page
On Automating the Doctrine of Double Effect
The doctrine of double effect () is a long-studied ethical
principle that governs when actions that have both positive and negative
effects are to be allowed. The goal in this paper is to automate
. We briefly present , and use a first-order
modal logic, the deontic cognitive event calculus, as our framework to
formalize the doctrine. We present formalizations of increasingly stronger
versions of the principle, including what is known as the doctrine of triple
effect. We then use our framework to simulate successfully scenarios that have
been used to test for the presence of the principle in human subjects. Our
framework can be used in two different modes: One can use it to build
-compliant autonomous systems from scratch, or one can use it to
verify that a given AI system is -compliant, by applying a
layer on an existing system or model. For the latter mode, the
underlying AI system can be built using any architecture (planners, deep neural
networks, bayesian networks, knowledge-representation systems, or a hybrid); as
long as the system exposes a few parameters in its model, such verification is
possible. The role of the layer here is akin to a (dynamic or
static) software verifier that examines existing software modules. Finally, we
end by presenting initial work on how one can apply our layer
to the STRIPS-style planning model, and to a modified POMDP model.This is
preliminary work to illustrate the feasibility of the second mode, and we hope
that our initial sketches can be useful for other researchers in incorporating
DDE in their own frameworks.Comment: 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2017;
Special Track on AI & Autonom
Indexing the Event Calculus with Kd-trees to Monitor Diabetes
Personal Health Systems (PHS) are mobile solutions tailored to monitoring
patients affected by chronic non communicable diseases. A patient affected by a
chronic disease can generate large amounts of events. Type 1 Diabetic patients
generate several glucose events per day, ranging from at least 6 events per day
(under normal monitoring) to 288 per day when wearing a continuous glucose
monitor (CGM) that samples the blood every 5 minutes for several days. This is
a large number of events to monitor for medical doctors, in particular when
considering that they may have to take decisions concerning adjusting the
treatment, which may impact the life of the patients for a long time. Given the
need to analyse such a large stream of data, doctors need a simple approach
towards physiological time series that allows them to promptly transfer their
knowledge into queries to identify interesting patterns in the data. Achieving
this with current technology is not an easy task, as on one hand it cannot be
expected that medical doctors have the technical knowledge to query databases
and on the other hand these time series include thousands of events, which
requires to re-think the way data is indexed. In order to tackle the knowledge
representation and efficiency problem, this contribution presents the kd-tree
cached event calculus (\ceckd) an event calculus extension for knowledge
engineering of temporal rules capable to handle many thousands events produced
by a diabetic patient. \ceckd\ is built as a support to a graphical interface
to represent monitoring rules for diabetes type 1. In addition, the paper
evaluates the \ceckd\ with respect to the cached event calculus (CEC) to show
how indexing events using kd-trees improves scalability with respect to the
current state of the art.Comment: 24 pages, preliminary results calculated on an implementation of
CECKD, precursor to Journal paper being submitted in 2017, with further
indexing and results possibilities, put here for reference and chronological
purposes to remember how the idea evolve
- …